op-e2e: test op-geth pending gas limit configuration

[protolambda]

Description

Test the pending gas limit configurability in ethereum-optimism/op-geth#24

TODO: merge the op-geth PR first, and then update the geth references everywhere. For now I updated only the go.work for CI to run.

Tests

Test that blocks can be produced, and the verifier can pick up blocks, with consistent block gas limit that does not conflict with the local sequencer or verifier pending gas limit configurations.

Additional context

Reducing the local pending gas limit helps prevent self-DoS when the tx pool fills up and the gas limit is extremely high (e.g. the opcraft chain)

Metadata

Fix ENG-2978

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 5fce9fc

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[protolambda]

Converted this into draft. It's ready, but not that urgent. Happy thanksgiving.

[mergify]

Hey @protolambda! This PR has merge conflicts. Please fix them before continuing review.

[protolambda]

Ready for review, but we'll need to update the op-geth references in go.mod files, for CI I just updated the go.work

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4047 (5fce9fc) into develop (13a72cb) will decrease coverage by 5.84%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4047      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    41.11%   35.26%   -5.85%     
===========================================
  Files          322      170     -152     
  Lines        17526    13357    -4169     
  Branches       784        0     -784     
===========================================
- Hits          7205     4711    -2494     
+ Misses        9808     8167    -1641     
+ Partials       513      479      -34     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bedrock-go-tests	35.26% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
contracts-bedrock-tests	?
contracts-periphery-tests	?
contracts-tests	?
core-utils-tests	?
dtl-tests	?
fault-detector-tests	?
sdk-tests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
op-node/p2p/discovery.go	65.52% <0.00%> (-2.39%)	⬇️
...ontracts/L2/predeploys/OVM_L2ToL1MessagePasser.sol
...ontracts-periphery/contracts/L1/L1ERC721Bridge.sol
packages/core-utils/src/optimism/batch-encoding.ts
packages/sdk/src/cross-chain-messenger.ts
packages/sdk/src/interfaces/types.ts
...cts/contracts/L1/deployment/ChugSplashDictator.sol
...s-bedrock/contracts/legacy/LegacyMessagePasser.sol
...ntracts-bedrock/contracts/libraries/Arithmetic.sol
...ontracts-periphery/contracts/L2/L2ERC721Bridge.sol
... and 143 more

[tynes]

Looks good to me with a couple of questions

[protolambda]

*need to merge op-geth PR + update mod references before merging this PR.

[trianglesphere]

lgtm

[protolambda]

merged op-geth PR, will update remaining geth references now for this PR to get merged with those

[protolambda]

updated op-geth with make update-op-geth, and updated the update script to include the op-wheel module