Skip to content

specs: add predeploys#2568

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
specs/predeploys
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

specs: add predeploys#2568
mergify[bot] merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
specs/predeploys

Conversation

@tynes
Copy link
Contributor

@tynes tynes commented May 16, 2022

Description
Add predeploys spec. These need to be upgraded in a backwards compatible way

Replaces ethereum-optimism/optimistic-specs#379

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 16, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 01e6849

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@tynes tynes force-pushed the specs/predeploys branch from 620bf73 to 131e2ef Compare May 18, 2022 20:09
Copy link
Contributor

@trianglesphere trianglesphere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I cross referenced this list with the contracts (after #2580) and I think I'm only seeing one missing contract in the other PR. EDIT: I found the OptimismMintableTokenFactory in a different folder.

At this point it's one question about a name / deprecation.

One other thing that got dropped is that we need to pull these addresses into go and make sure that we use them in the right places in our test systems (we are currently using self consistently wrong addresses which is why it works now). - this is not a blocker for this PR.

@trianglesphere
Copy link
Contributor

@tynes are you planning to push this forwards?

@tynes tynes force-pushed the specs/predeploys branch from 131e2ef to 62ce706 Compare June 7, 2022 19:44
@tynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tynes commented Jun 7, 2022

@tynes are you planning to push this forwards?

I fixed the issue noted above, there are other places that the contract is named incorrectly but I think we should do that in a follow up PR

@tynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tynes commented Jun 7, 2022

I'd also like to remove all references to the interfaces in this eventually and instead link to an interfaces directory in contracts-bedrock so that there is a single source of truth

Copy link
Contributor

@trianglesphere trianglesphere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

I'm not sure where we should record the follow ups (ensure L1 Block is the contract name & reminder to upgrade to interfaces).

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 7, 2022

This PR has been added to the merge queue, and will be merged soon.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 7, 2022

This PR is next in line to be merged, and will be merged as soon as checks pass.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 24e4c07 into develop Jun 7, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the specs/predeploys branch June 7, 2022 23:59
@mergify mergify bot removed the on-merge-train label Jun 7, 2022
This was referenced Jun 8, 2022
theochap pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
## Overview

Adds the confirmation-delayed provider for the sequencer's L1 origin
selector. This provider holds a reference to the L1 chain's head, and
delays any block-by-number requests by a configurable amount. This
prevents the sequencer from selecting an origin too close to the tip of
the chain, resulting in fewer L1 origin selections that are reorganized
out.

closes #2401
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants