Skip to content

Depreciated unused variable from Integration tests#2112

Merged
smartcontracts merged 1 commit intoethereum-optimism:developfrom
RishiKumarRay:Remove-unused-variable
Feb 1, 2022
Merged

Depreciated unused variable from Integration tests#2112
smartcontracts merged 1 commit intoethereum-optimism:developfrom
RishiKumarRay:Remove-unused-variable

Conversation

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor

Description
remove the unused variable from the integration tests

Metadata

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 1e27b34

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-integration Area: integration tests label Feb 1, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@smartcontracts smartcontracts Feb 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll also need to remove the reference to sequencerBalance shown below (on line 47)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@smartcontracts i have removed it, please review and thanks for letting me know this

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 1, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #2112 (7b713b4) into develop (137f776) will decrease coverage by 2.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 7b713b4 differs from pull request most recent head a14c31d. Consider uploading reports for the commit a14c31d to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2112      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    75.37%   73.37%   -2.01%     
===========================================
  Files           81       85       +4     
  Lines         2705     2836     +131     
  Branches       436      464      +28     
===========================================
+ Hits          2039     2081      +42     
- Misses         666      755      +89     
Flag Coverage Δ
batch-submitter 62.63% <ø> (ø)
contracts 90.48% <ø> (ø)
core-utils 59.94% <ø> (ø)
data-transport-layer 38.64% <ø> (ø)
message-relayer 70.86% <ø> (ø)
sdk 72.63% <ø> (-13.71%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/sdk/src/cross-chain-messenger.ts 54.28% <0.00%> (-11.85%) ⬇️
packages/sdk/src/cross-chain-provider.ts 78.71% <0.00%> (-8.97%) ⬇️
packages/sdk/src/index.ts 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/sdk/src/interfaces/types.ts 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/sdk/src/adapters/eth-bridge.ts 52.50% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/sdk/src/adapters/dai-bridge.ts 35.71% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/sdk/src/adapters/index.ts 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/sdk/src/adapters/standard-bridge.ts 55.55% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/sdk/src/utils/contracts.ts 100.00% <0.00%> (+6.66%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 137f776...a14c31d. Read the comment docs.

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

RishiKumarRay commented Feb 1, 2022

@smartcontracts i saw a proxy sequencer reference that was not removed and it was failing linting workflow but now i have removed that, can you trigger the workflow again please

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smartcontracts looks like everything has passed ? Is there anything else ?

@smartcontracts
Copy link
Contributor

@RishiKumarRay would you mind rebasing this PR into a single commit using the conventional commit format? Once that's done, I'll go ahead and approve (and then merge).

@smartcontracts
Copy link
Contributor

@RishiKumarRay let me know if you're having any trouble rebasing, I can try to help

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

RishiKumarRay commented Feb 1, 2022

@smartcontracts Yeah please help me , i have messed up rebasing the commit , can you guide me please?

removed unused variable

removed-sequencer

removed-sequencer references

remove sequencer variable

removed unused variable

removed-sequencer

removed-sequencer references

remove sequencer variable
@RishiKumarRay RishiKumarRay force-pushed the Remove-unused-variable branch from c838205 to 1e27b34 Compare February 1, 2022 19:49
@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smartcontracts please check the rebase , i think i have successfully done it

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smartcontracts Since i can see now only one commit is present so it is done right?

@smartcontracts
Copy link
Contributor

@smartcontracts Since i can see now only one commit is present so it is done right?

Yep! Perfect. I will run the integration tests one more time...

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smartcontracts Thanks , the tests has passed too

@smartcontracts smartcontracts merged commit f569130 into ethereum-optimism:develop Feb 1, 2022
@smartcontracts
Copy link
Contributor

Great work, thank you @RishiKumarRay! Feel free to email me at [kelvin AT optimism DOT io] for a hand-drawn contributor NFT :-)

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smartcontracts thanks , this is cool , i really want something like that , also i have sended you mail from my personal id - rishirai 760 AT gmail dot com, you might have received it. thanks

@RishiKumarRay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smartcontracts did you received my email??

theochap pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
### Description

Tracks peer ping latencies so we can return the latencies in the peer
info response.

Progress on #1562
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-integration Area: integration tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove unused variable from integration tests

3 participants