Added withActionInstrumentation to track server action errors#241
Added withActionInstrumentation to track server action errors#241
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications across several files, primarily focusing on enhancing error handling and action tracking through instrumentation. A new higher-order function, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/web/utils/actions/middleware.ts (3)
1-2: Consider usingimport typeforServerActionResponse.Since
ServerActionResponseis only used as a type in the function signature, you can use a type-only import to potentially improve build performance.Apply this change:
import { withServerActionInstrumentation } from "@sentry/nextjs"; -import { type ServerActionResponse } from "@/utils/error"; +import type { ServerActionResponse } from "@/utils/error";🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-2: All these imports are only used as types.
Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.(lint/style/useImportType)
4-4: Consider adding documentation for theanytype usage.The use of
anyin the generic type constraintArgs extends any[]is flagged by the static analysis tool. While it's necessary for the function's flexibility, it's good practice to document why it's used to suppress linter warnings and inform other developers.Consider adding a comment explaining the use of
any:// `any` is used here to allow for maximum flexibility in argument types export function withActionInstrumentation<Args extends any[], T>( // ... rest of the function🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 4-4: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
13-13: Consider the performance impact of recording responses by default.The current implementation records responses by default (
options?.recordResponse ?? true). While this provides comprehensive logging, it might have performance implications for high-volume actions or large response payloads.Consider changing the default to
falseand explicitly enabling it where needed:-recordResponse: options?.recordResponse ?? true, +recordResponse: options?.recordResponse ?? false,Alternatively, if recording responses is crucial for most use cases, add a comment explaining the rationale behind this default behavior.
apps/web/utils/actions/helpers.ts (2)
16-21: Improved error handling with action name tracking.The changes to
handleErrorfunction enhance error tracking by including theactionNamein the captured exception. This aligns well with the PR objective of tracking server action errors.Consider using object destructuring for the function parameters to make it more readable and easier to extend in the future:
export function handleError({ actionName, error, message, userEmail }: { actionName: string; error: unknown; message: string; userEmail: string; }) { // ... function body ... }
Line range hint
1-39: Summary of changes and request for clarification on future plans.The changes in this file significantly improve error handling and tracking by introducing the
actionNameparameter to bothhandleErrorandexecuteServerActionfunctions. This aligns well with the PR objective of tracking server action errors.However, the comment about potentially removing
executeServerActionand replacing it withwithActionInstrumentation()raises some questions:
- What is the timeline for this planned change?
- Can you provide more information about the
withActionInstrumentation()function?- Are there any other files in this PR that introduce or use
withActionInstrumentation()?Understanding these future plans would help in evaluating the long-term impact of these changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/web/utils/actions/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/utils/actions/mail.ts (10 hunks)
- apps/web/utils/actions/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts
[error] 221-221: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 723-723: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
apps/web/utils/actions/middleware.ts
[error] 4-4: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 1-2: All these imports are only used as types.
Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.(lint/style/useImportType)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/web/utils/actions/middleware.ts (1)
4-17: LGTM! Well-structured higher-order function for action instrumentation.The implementation of
withActionInstrumentationlooks good. It provides a clean abstraction for wrapping server actions with Sentry instrumentation, allowing for flexible use with different action signatures.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 4-4: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/utils/actions/helpers.ts (1)
26-37: Improved server action execution with better error tracking.The changes to
executeServerActionfunction enhance error handling by including theactionNamein the error capture process. This aligns well with the PR objective of tracking server action errors.The comment suggests that this function might be replaced by
withActionInstrumentation(). Could you provide more information about this planned change? It would be helpful to understand the roadmap for this functionality.To verify the usage of
executeServerAction, let's run the following script:This will help us understand the current usage and potential impact of removing this function in the future.
✅ Verification successful
Verified single usage of
executeServerAction.The function
executeServerActionis only used in the following location:
apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.tsThis confirms that the function is utilized in a single place, aligning with the review comment. Proceeding with its removal and replacement with
withActionInstrumentation()is appropriate.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of executeServerAction function # Test: Search for function calls to executeServerAction rg --type typescript 'executeServerAction\(' -A 5Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of executeServerAction function # Corrected Test: Search for function calls to executeServerAction rg --type ts 'executeServerAction\(' -A 5Length of output: 426
apps/web/utils/actions/mail.ts (10)
29-29: Improved error handling with action name.The addition of the
actionNameparameter toexecuteGmailActionand its usage in error handling is a good improvement. This change will provide more specific context in error messages, making debugging and troubleshooting easier.Also applies to: 44-44, 48-48
56-56: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "archiveThread" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
72-72: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "trashThread" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
88-88: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "trashMessage" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
99-99: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "markReadThread" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
110-110: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "markImportantMessage" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
120-120: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "markSpamThread" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
131-131: LGTM: Correct implementation of action name.The addition of "createAutoArchiveFilter" as the action name is correct and consistent with the function's purpose.
147-147: LGTM: Correct implementation of action names.The addition of "createFilter" and "deleteFilter" as action names for their respective functions is correct and consistent with their purposes.
Also applies to: 157-157
Line range hint
29-157: Overall improvement in error handling and traceability.The changes in this file consistently implement the new
actionNameparameter across all relevant functions. This improvement enhances error handling and traceability for Gmail-related actions, which will be beneficial for debugging and monitoring. The implementation is consistent and well-executed throughout the file.
| if (!result) return { error: "AI error creating rule." }; | ||
| try { | ||
| result = await aiCreateRule(prompt, user, user.email); | ||
| } catch (error: any) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace any with unknown in the catch block to enhance type safety
Using any disables type checking and can mask potential issues. It's better to use unknown and then properly handle the error.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- } catch (error: any) {
+ } catch (error: unknown) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } catch (error: any) { | |
| } catch (error: unknown) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 221-221: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
These updates enhance the reliability and observability of actions within the application, providing a smoother user experience.