Skip to content

Simplify fix rule flow#277

Merged
elie222 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
simplify-ai-fix-rule
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Simplify fix rule flow#277
elie222 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
simplify-ai-fix-rule

Conversation

@elie222
Copy link
Owner

@elie222 elie222 commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced user interface for reporting mistakes with improved loading and error handling.
    • Introduced new components for better management of rule suggestions and user interactions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated naming conventions for rule identifiers to improve clarity and consistency across the application.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined state management and rendering logic in the ReportMistake component.
    • Simplified the structure of validation schemas and related functions for better readability.
  • Documentation

    • Updated internal documentation to reflect changes in naming conventions and component functionality.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
inbox-zero 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 22, 2024 8:44pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on a comprehensive renaming and refactoring effort across multiple files in the web application. The changes primarily involve standardizing terminology related to rule identification, specifically replacing terms like "correct" and "incorrect" with "expected" and "actual". This renaming spans test files, utility functions, and React components, ensuring consistent naming conventions throughout the codebase. The modifications improve clarity and semantic understanding without fundamentally altering the core functionality of the affected components.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/web/__tests__/ai-rule-fix.test.ts Renamed test parameters from incorrectRule/correctRule to actualRule/expectedRule
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ReportMistake.tsx Comprehensive refactoring of component structure, state management, and view handling
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/TestRules.tsx Minor improvements to rendering logic and optional chaining
apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts Renamed function parameters in reportAiMistakeAction
apps/web/utils/actions/validation.ts Updated validation schema property names
apps/web/utils/ai/rule/rule-fix.ts Modified RuleFixResponse type and aiRuleFix function signatures

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ReportMistake
    participant AIFix
    participant ValidationService
    
    User->>ReportMistake: Initiate mistake reporting
    ReportMistake->>AIFix: Request rule fix
    AIFix->>ValidationService: Validate rules
    ValidationService-->>AIFix: Validation result
    AIFix-->>ReportMistake: Suggested fix
    ReportMistake->>User: Display fix options
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Refactoring Rhyme 🔧

From "correct" to "expected" we leap,
Renaming rules with a logical sweep
Code clarity shines, oh so bright
Refactoring brings pure delight!
A bunny's touch makes syntax clean 🌟

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b63cc36 and a13733e.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • apps/web/__tests__/ai-rule-fix.test.ts (6 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ReportMistake.tsx (9 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/automation/TestRules.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts (4 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/actions/validation.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/ai/rule/rule-fix.ts (3 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@elie222 elie222 merged commit 6fadf47 into main Dec 22, 2024
1 check passed
@sentry
Copy link

sentry bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Suspect Issues

This pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:

  • ‼️ TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id') /automation View Issue

Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2025
@elie222 elie222 deleted the simplify-ai-fix-rule branch December 18, 2025 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments