[text-auditor] Fix occurred typos in exported field descriptions by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #49086 · elastic/beats

github-actions · 2026-02-24T22:28:19Z

Summary

fixed occured -> occurred in x-pack/filebeat/module/okta/system/_meta/fields.yml
fixed occured -> occurred in x-pack/metricbeat/module/oracle/performance/_meta/fields.yml
updated generated/exported docs to reflect both changes:
- docs/reference/filebeat/exported-fields-okta.md
- docs/reference/metricbeat/exported-fields-oracle.md
- filebeat/docs/fields.asciidoc

Validation

verified no remaining occured matches in the five touched files.
no build/test run (text-only documentation and field-description typo fixes).
Fixes [text-auditor] Fix two user-facing "occured" typos in exported field descriptions #49082

What is this? | From workflow: Mention in Issue

Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions · 2026-02-24T22:28:20Z

✅ Pull request created: #49086

mergify · 2026-02-24T22:28:58Z

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @github-actions[bot]? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

github-actions · 2026-02-27T02:11:13Z

✅ Vale Linting Results

No issues found on modified lines!

The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide.

To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale.

github-actions · 2026-02-27T02:12:17Z

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

coderabbitai · 2026-02-27T02:12:19Z

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b7039737-9893-4b62-9a68-7e91e86f8e50

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0805a62 and 6313c96.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

docs/reference/filebeat/exported-fields-okta.md
docs/reference/metricbeat/exported-fields-oracle.md
x-pack/metricbeat/module/oracle/fields.go

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

x-pack/metricbeat/module/oracle/fields.go

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

docs/reference/filebeat/exported-fields-okta.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR fixes two spelling errors ("occured" → "occurred") in exported-field descriptions for the Okta suspicious activity OS field and the Oracle performance parse statistic. It also includes minor formatting cleanups (whitespace and blank-line adjustments) in several documentation files and non-functional string literal formatting changes in generated asset Go files. No behavioral, logic, or public API/signature changes were made.

Possibly related issues

Issue 49082 — Fixes two user-facing "occured" typos in exported field descriptions for Okta and Oracle modules.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	PR successfully addresses all objectives from issue `#49082`: corrected 'occured' to 'occurred' in both required _meta/fields.yml files and regenerated all dependent documentation.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are directly scoped to fixing the two spelling typos and their documentation impacts. No unrelated modifications detected.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

🛠️ Update Documentation: Commit on current branch
🛠️ Update Documentation: Create PR

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

github-actions · 2026-02-27T02:24:22Z

The failure is caused by generated artifacts being out of date, specifically x-pack/filebeat/module/okta/fields.go.

From the failed check job (Run check step):

Error: some files are not up-to-date. Run 'make update' then review and commit the changes. Modified: [x-pack/filebeat/module/okta/fields.go]
make[1]: *** [../../dev-tools/make/mage.mk:21: check] Error 1

Why this happened:

This PR updates x-pack/filebeat/module/okta/system/_meta/fields.yml (typo occured -> occurred) but does not include the corresponding regenerated Go fields file.
Changed files list includes the YAML and docs, but not x-pack/filebeat/module/okta/fields.go.

Recommended minimal fix:

Regenerate artifacts (make update from repo root, or the equivalent module-scoped update command).
Commit the resulting change to x-pack/filebeat/module/okta/fields.go.
Re-run CI.

Tests run by me in this investigation:

No local build/tests executed; analysis was based on the workflow job logs for run 22469772245 and PR file diff inspection.

What is this? | From workflow: PR Actions Detective

Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.

strawgate · 2026-02-27T02:25:54Z

/ai you have to run make update i think and commit

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

andrewkroh · 2026-02-27T02:46:23Z

We would not need make update if we jumped into 2021 era Go, and use go:embed. It would likely make a lot things in our build process easier.

This is like a bot party in here.

vishaangelova

LGTM!

github-actions · 2026-03-09T09:37:14Z

Workflow run 22846701059 succeeded; there is no failed GitHub Actions check to triage.

PR: #49086 ([text-auditor] Fix occurred typos in exported field descriptions)
Jobs reviewed: 1 (pre-commit) — conclusion: success
Failed jobs/steps: none
Root cause of failure: not applicable (run passed)
Recommended remediation: no code or workflow changes needed

Tests/verification performed:

Queried workflow run metadata and associated PR
Listed workflow jobs and step conclusions
Checked failed-job logs endpoint (failed_jobs: 0)

What is this? | From workflow: PR Actions Detective

Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.

github-actions · 2026-03-09T09:55:03Z

Analyzed workflow run 22846701052 for this PR: there are no failures to debug.

Workflow conclusion: success
Jobs checked: lint (ubuntu-latest), lint (windows-latest), lint (macos-latest) — all success
Failed-step/log inspection: 0 failed jobs found for the run

Root cause: none (no failing check in this run).
Recommended action: no code/workflow changes needed for this run.

Tests/verification performed:

Retrieved workflow run metadata and associated PR linkage
Retrieved full job list and per-job conclusions
Queried failed job logs for the run (none returned)

If you intended a different failing run, share that run ID and I can investigate it directly.

What is this? | From workflow: PR Actions Detective

Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.

vishaangelova · 2026-03-09T19:19:16Z

@andrewkroh I’ve fixed the errors that caused the failing CI checks, could you have a look as a code owner, so we can get this merged? Thanks!:)

andrewkroh

Change to okta fields.yml LGTM.

vishaangelova · 2026-03-11T09:58:24Z

Hey @elastic/obs-infraobs-integrations, could you give a code owner review of this PR?

vishaangelova · 2026-03-16T07:40:34Z

Hey @shmsr could you have a look at this PR please? Thanks!

strawgate · 2026-03-24T18:48:18Z

Closing in favour of a restructured set of PRs that minimise the number of codeowner teams per PR, making approval more tractable. Replacements: #49638 #49639 #49640 #49641 #49642 #49643 #49644

Fix occured typos in exported field descriptions

1670ad7

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions Bot requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2026 22:28

botelastic Bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Feb 24, 2026

strawgate enabled auto-merge (squash) February 27, 2026 02:09

Merge branch 'main' into fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

46d0172

strawgate added the skip-changelog label Feb 27, 2026

x-pack/filebeat: regenerate okta fields asset

07d57a0

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

vishaangelova approved these changes Mar 5, 2026

View reviewed changes

vishaangelova and others added 3 commits March 5, 2026 14:18

Merge branch 'main' into fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

0805a62

Merge branch 'main' into fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

12d79ce

Fix failing CI checks

6313c96

andrewkroh approved these changes Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

c57be9d

vishaangelova added backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches Team:Docs Label for the Observability docs team labels Mar 11, 2026

botelastic Bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Mar 11, 2026

vishaangelova added 2 commits March 13, 2026 11:58

Merge branch 'main' into fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

b0ca08c

Merge branch 'main' into fix-49082-occurred-typos-e22d9f375678918d

d30f687

strawgate closed this Mar 24, 2026

auto-merge was automatically disabled March 24, 2026 18:48
Pull request was closed

Conversation

github-actions Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

Summary

Validation

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

mergify Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✅ Vale Linting Results

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Possibly related issues

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

strawgate commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

andrewkroh commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

vishaangelova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Uh oh!

vishaangelova commented Mar 9, 2026

Uh oh!

andrewkroh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

vishaangelova commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

vishaangelova commented Mar 16, 2026

Uh oh!

strawgate commented Mar 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

github-actions Bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

andrewkroh commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading