Skip to content

Add Non-Faulting behaviour for Sve.LoadVector*NonFaulting*() #106648

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Add Non-Faulting behaviour for Sve.LoadVector*NonFaulting*() #106648

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

@SwapnilGaikwad
Copy link
Contributor

@SwapnilGaikwad SwapnilGaikwad commented Aug 19, 2024

Fixes: #105163

It also fixes the issue where FFR was not preserved and side-effects from the intrinsic not specified.

@a74nh @kunalspathak @dotnet/arm64-contrib @arch-arm64-sve @TIHan @amanasifkhalid

@ghost ghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Aug 19, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Aug 19, 2024
@SwapnilGaikwad
Copy link
Contributor Author

SwapnilGaikwad commented Aug 19, 2024

All stress tests are passing. 
===================Running default===================
------------------- {} -------------------
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_float() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_double() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_sbyte() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_short() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_int() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_long() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_byte() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_ushort() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_uint() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorNonFaulting_ulong() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorInt16NonFaultingSignExtendToInt32_int() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorInt16NonFaultingSignExtendToInt64_long() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorInt16NonFaultingSignExtendToUInt32_uint() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorInt16NonFaultingSignExtendToUInt64_ulong() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorInt32NonFaultingSignExtendToInt64_long() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorInt32NonFaultingSignExtendToUInt64_ulong() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorSByteNonFaultingSignExtendToInt16_short() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorSByteNonFaultingSignExtendToInt32_int() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorSByteNonFaultingSignExtendToInt64_long() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorSByteNonFaultingSignExtendToUInt16_ushort() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorSByteNonFaultingSignExtendToUInt32_uint() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorSByteNonFaultingSignExtendToUInt64_ulong() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorByteNonFaultingZeroExtendToInt16() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorByteNonFaultingZeroExtendToInt32() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorByteNonFaultingZeroExtendToInt64() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorByteNonFaultingZeroExtendToUInt16() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorByteNonFaultingZeroExtendToUInt32() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorByteNonFaultingZeroExtendToUInt64() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorUInt16NonFaultingZeroExtendToInt32() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorUInt16NonFaultingZeroExtendToInt64() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorUInt16NonFaultingZeroExtendToUInt32() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorUInt16NonFaultingZeroExtendToUInt64() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorUInt32NonFaultingZeroExtendToInt64() : 18
Passed test: _Sve_ro::JIT.HardwareIntrinsics.Arm._Sve.Program.Sve_LoadVectorUInt32NonFaultingZeroExtendToUInt64() : 18
===================Running jitstress===================
------------------- {'JitMinOpts': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '1', 'TieredCompilation': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'TieredCompilation': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'TailcallStress': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'ReadyToRun': '0'} -------------------
===================Running jitstressregs===================
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '2'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '3'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '4'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '8'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x10'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x80'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x1000'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStressRegs': '0x2000'} -------------------
===================Running jitstress2-jitstressregs===================
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '1'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '2'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '3'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '4'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '8'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x10'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x80'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x1000'} -------------------
------------------- {'JitStress': '2', 'JitStressRegs': '0x2000'} -------------------

@build-analysis build-analysis bot mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2024
Closed
a74nh
a74nh approved these changes Aug 20, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@a74nh a74nh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM.

Looks like we are missing FFR tracking for gatherload first faulting methods too. We should do that in a follow on PR.

@SwapnilGaikwad
Copy link
Contributor Author

SwapnilGaikwad commented Aug 20, 2024

This LGTM.

Looks like we are missing FFR tracking for gatherload first faulting methods too. We should do that in a follow on PR.

As discussed offline, the LoadVectorNonFaulting are in SVE2 so we can skip them for now🙂.

amanasifkhalid
amanasifkhalid approved these changes Aug 20, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM too, thanks!

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Contributor

amanasifkhalid commented Aug 21, 2024

/ba-g runtime-dev-innerloop failure is from CI machine rebooting

@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid merged commit 4e8892e into dotnet:main Aug 21, 2024
@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Contributor

amanasifkhalid commented Aug 21, 2024

Looks like we are missing FFR tracking for gatherload first faulting methods too. We should do that in a follow on PR.

@SwapnilGaikwad are you planning on doing this item? I think this is the source of the failure in #106621.

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Contributor

amanasifkhalid commented Aug 21, 2024

/backport to release/9.0

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 21, 2024

Started backporting to release/9.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/10494433508

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2024
Merged
4 tasks
@SwapnilGaikwad SwapnilGaikwad deleted the github-add-nonFaulting-tests branch August 22, 2024 10:03
@SwapnilGaikwad
Copy link
Contributor Author

SwapnilGaikwad commented Aug 22, 2024

Looks like we are missing FFR tracking for gatherload first faulting methods too. We should do that in a follow on PR.

@SwapnilGaikwad are you planning on doing this item? I think this is the source of the failure in #106621.

Hi @amanasifkhalid, there were GatherVectorFirstFaulting and LoadVectorFirstFautling in SVE1. We have the FFR tracking for them. Alan may have referred to APIs from SVE2 group so skipped them.
However, happy to take a look at the #106621 👍

@SwapnilGaikwad
Copy link
Contributor Author

SwapnilGaikwad commented Aug 22, 2024

Continuing conversation here.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

2 more reviewers

@a74nh a74nh a74nh approved these changes

@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JIT: SVE - Add FFR lifetime tracking as well as test coverage for NonFaulting APIs

3 participants

@SwapnilGaikwad @amanasifkhalid @a74nh