TEST: v2.2.x + blas variants#341
Conversation
…onda-forge-pinning 2024.12.08.12.26.17
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( I do have some suggestions for making it better though... For recipe/meta.yaml:
This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12248515405. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail. |
Update for numpy 2.2.0From all green 2.1.0 (but actually 3/51 failures due to a latent test skip; see below), we're now in the same situation 5/85 failures, i.e. only linux + aarch64 + OpenBLAS fails. Notable
# there are some tests that cannot really work in emulation, see e.g. numpy/numpy#20445
{% set tests_to_skip = tests_to_skip + " or Test_ARM_Features" %} # [build_platform != target_platform]
{% set tests_to_skip = tests_to_skip + " or Test_POWER_Features" %} # [build_platform != target_platform]
# test_new_policy reruns part of test suite; including a CPU feature test that fails in emulation
{% set tests_to_skip = tests_to_skip + " or test_new_policy" %} # [build_platform != target_platform]State of BLAS/LAPACK
Details
** sum of Segfaults (S), Failures (F), resp. Timeouts (T); out of a total of 100 CI combinations being tested Build logs: linux + aarch64 + openblas: 4 test failures |
|
Closing this, now that 2.4 is out |
Continuing the analysis from #326, #317, #307, #293, #288, #273, #252, #237, #227 & #196. Do not merge.