Skip to content

Merge externals PRs from CPlayIt#2619

Merged
crusso merged 29 commits intomasterfrom
claudio/cPlayIt/patch
Jun 21, 2021
Merged

Merge externals PRs from CPlayIt#2619
crusso merged 29 commits intomasterfrom
claudio/cPlayIt/patch

Conversation

@crusso
Copy link
Contributor

@crusso crusso commented Jun 21, 2021

PR #2616
PR #2615
PR #2613
PR #2611
PR #2609
PR #2608
PR #2607

CI isn't working properly for forks, so merging these external PRs by hand.

cPlayIt and others added 29 commits June 19, 2021 14:41
Not best-practice to use former/latter with lists more than 2
A bit hard to follow as worded.
a bit confusing as written as a pun is typically play on a word implying a different meaning of a term... does alias make more sense here?
I'm just learning so a bit unsure, but I believe scrutineer (with the "r") may have been the word the author was going for, but in this context "alternative" probably makes more sense? ...
alternative makes most sense to me as an extension of scrutineer.

You have 2 scrutineers, 2 alternatives...

... but with just 1 option, it should probably be scrutineer as there's only one case block doing the scrutinizing if I am following.
Co-authored-by: Claudio Russo <claudio@dfinity.org>
@dfinity-ci
Copy link

This PR does not affect the produced WebAssembly code.

@crusso crusso requested a review from rossberg June 21, 2021 13:48
Copy link
Contributor

@osa1 osa1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Some of the changes are just rewording, for example:

- We see that an object with three fields is being built
+ This code constructs a record with three fields

I'm curious how to evaluate such changes?

@crusso crusso requested a review from kritzcreek June 21, 2021 13:49
@crusso
Copy link
Contributor Author

crusso commented Jun 21, 2021

LGTM.

Some of the changes are just rewording, for example:

- We see that an object with three fields is being built
+ This code constructs a record with three fields

I'm curious how to evaluate such changes?

No idea, I'm using the force.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Comments