-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 765
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DecisionTree Refactor #1155
DecisionTree Refactor #1155
Conversation
@dellaert hope this PR is up to your expectations. |
@dellaert gentle reminder to take a look at this when you can :) |
/** | ||
* Functor performing depth-first visit without Assignment<L> argument. | ||
* | ||
* NOTE: We differentiate between leaves and assignments. Concretely, a 3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, what does this Functor do? Leaves, right? And should it not now pass the number of assignments captured by the leaf?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The VisitLeaf
functor passes the Leaf
object which has the number of assignments recorded in it.
gtsam/discrete/DecisionTree-inl.h
Outdated
@@ -678,7 +680,14 @@ namespace gtsam { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/****************************************************************************/ | |||
// Functor performing depth-first visit without Assignment<L> argument. | |||
/** | |||
* Functor performing depth-first visit without Assignment<L> argument. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the argument then?
gtsam/discrete/DecisionTree-inl.h
Outdated
@@ -763,12 +775,14 @@ namespace gtsam { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/****************************************************************************/ | |||
// labels is just done with a visit | |||
// Get (partial) labels by performing a visit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Explain more. Maybe with example.
* | ||
* @note Due to pruning, leaves might not exhaust choices. | ||
* | ||
* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think these functions passed in should now also take an argument for the number of assignments captured in a particular leaf.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added visitLeaf
as an alternative to that. Should I remove that and update the rest to do this (will be API breaking)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shoot, I merged too soon! I just noticed this new visitLeaf, which in this PR seems identical??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And the examples are wrong I think... We can talk about it in our meeting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay! Though I don't want to spend more than 5 minutes on this since it is secondary to the workshop paper.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved, and I will merge...
Refactored
DecisionTree
to:DT_NO_PRUNING
toGTSAM_DT_NO_PRUNING
in the event we decide to expose it via CMake.