feat(biome_js_analyze): update the methods of noFocusedTests

[chansuke]

Summary

Fixes #597

Test Plan

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for biomejs canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	76394f7
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/biomejs/deploys/65ee9cbc04abf00008827214

[Conaclos]

I misunderstood your question. Why should we rule out describe.only and the like?

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1999 will not alter performance

_{Comparing chansuke:feat/update-no-focused-tests (76394f7) with main (75eed2e)}

Summary

✅ 93 untouched benchmarks

[chansuke]

@Conaclos
Apologies for the confusion 🙇
Based on your statement

I think we could restrict the rule to test.only, describe.only and it.only'

I understood that we needed to limit the rule specifically to the describe, it, and test methods...

https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/0986acd6f859a08dda59b5990e267a8643be85a9/crates/biome_js_analyze/tests/specs/nursery/noFocusedTests/invalid.js

[Conaclos]

@Conaclos Apologies for the confusion 🙇 Based on your statement

I think we could restrict the rule to test.only, describe.only and it.only'

I understood that we needed to limit the rule specifically to the describe, it, and test methods...

https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/0986acd6f859a08dda59b5990e267a8643be85a9/crates/biome_js_analyze/tests/specs/nursery/noFocusedTests/invalid.js

You are right.
However, support for fdescribe and fit was added later in #1858 and #597 was not updated...
Unfortunately it seems that #1641, #1858, and #1864 were unaware of #597.

Could you add again the support of fdescribe and fit?
Otherwise, the changes you brought looks good to me :)
Sorry for the confusion, I was as confused as you are ^^

[Conaclos]

Great job :)