Skip to content

fix(federation): fix logic in computing non trivial follow up edges#5634

Closed
dariuszkuc wants to merge 3 commits intodevfrom
followup_edges
Closed

fix(federation): fix logic in computing non trivial follow up edges#5634
dariuszkuc wants to merge 3 commits intodevfrom
followup_edges

Conversation

@dariuszkuc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dariuszkuc dariuszkuc commented Jul 9, 2024

Fix handling of SubgraphEnteringTransition which should skip RootTypeResolution edges. This fixes the issue with redundantly processing same edges over and over again.

Fix handling of KeyResolution which should compare whole selection sets of the conditions vs just the selections.


Checklist

Complete the checklist (and note appropriate exceptions) before the PR is marked ready-for-review.

  • Changes are compatible1
  • Documentation2 completed
  • Performance impact assessed and acceptable
  • Tests added and passing3
    • Unit Tests
    • Integration Tests
    • Manual Tests

Exceptions

Note any exceptions here

Notes

Footnotes

  1. It may be appropriate to bring upcoming changes to the attention of other (impacted) groups. Please endeavour to do this before seeking PR approval. The mechanism for doing this will vary considerably, so use your judgement as to how and when to do this.

  2. Configuration is an important part of many changes. Where applicable please try to document configuration examples.

  3. Tick whichever testing boxes are applicable. If you are adding Manual Tests, please document the manual testing (extensively) in the Exceptions.

Fix handling of `SubgraphEnteringTransition` which should skip `RootTypeResolution` edges.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2024

@dariuszkuc, please consider creating a changeset entry in /.changesets/. These instructions describe the process and tooling.

@router-perf
Copy link
Copy Markdown

router-perf bot commented Jul 9, 2024

CI performance tests

  • const - Basic stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • demand-control-instrumented - A copy of the step test, but with demand control monitoring and metrics enabled
  • demand-control-uninstrumented - A copy of the step test, but with demand control monitoring enabled
  • enhanced-signature - Enhanced signature enabled
  • events - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED
  • events_big_cap_high_rate - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity
  • events_big_cap_high_rate_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity using callback mode
  • events_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED in callback mode
  • events_without_dedup - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED
  • events_without_dedup_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED using callback mode
  • extended-reference-mode - Extended reference mode enabled
  • large-request - Stress test with a 1 MB request payload
  • no-tracing - Basic stress test, no tracing
  • reload - Reload test over a long period of time at a constant rate of users
  • step-jemalloc-tuning - Clone of the basic stress test for jemalloc tuning
  • step-local-metrics - Field stats that are generated from the router rather than FTV1
  • step-with-prometheus - A copy of the step test with the Prometheus metrics exporter enabled
  • step - Basic stress test that steps up the number of users over time
  • xlarge-request - Stress test with 10 MB request payload
  • xxlarge-request - Stress test with 100 MB request payload

@lrlna
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lrlna commented Jul 9, 2024

@dariuszkuc can you add a regression test for this?

@goto-bus-stop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

do we still want a regression test here? (is it possible to write one, or is it only a performance difference?)

otherwise we should merge it I think

@dariuszkuc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Superseded by #5766

@dariuszkuc dariuszkuc closed this Aug 7, 2024
@dariuszkuc dariuszkuc deleted the followup_edges branch August 7, 2024 05:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants