-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
Update to Spark 1.6.3 and 2.0.2 #1682
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
failed, to be fixed with #1683 |
|
BTW, have you checked the spark's dependencies version needs to be updated, like py4j & protobuf ? |
|
I did check - I don't think they change in patch version. They have changed in upcoming Spark 2.1.0 though. |
|
not sure why, there is no error in the log. I think travis terminates it only because the log is too long |
|
nice, CI passed. ready for review (I will likely undo the |
|
LGTM, but looks like you need to rebase |
|
What do people think about the |
|
Great update @felixcheung ! On the |
|
@bzz from what I can see here, downloading new dependencies that are not in cache generates more than half of the log spew. As for other cases where CI were failing, perhaps we were seeing increasing occurrences of getting "uncached"? that we have to re-download more frequently? Since this has passed I can undo the --quiet to see if it should pick up from the cache without having to redownload everything. I'll try that once this CI run is completed. |
|
There is really strange test failure in @1ambda have you seen that before? |
|
I also see this error in #1612 |
|
The test above is non-deterministic actually because calling websequence API (network operation) is required to get the rendered result. We might This test passes usually, but sometime having trouble with calling API if websequencediagrams.com is not available. |
|
@zjffdu thank you for pointing it out! @1ambda can you please create a new JIRA issue with As for useless console output - @felixcheung other 2 CI profile failures are not relevant and will be taken care of in different PR (#1689) Looks great to me. |
|
It is definitely better to do. I will create new JIRA issue for it. |
|
@felixcheung I think after #1709 there might be no need for |
|
Looks great to me, thank you @felixcheung let's merge if there is no further discussion! CI failure of tests in @1ambda just for sake of history, please, feel free to post a link to JIRA issue on flaky markdown tests here |
|
Merging to master, if there is no further discussion. |
What is this PR for?
Update Spark versions
What type of PR is it?
Improvement
What is the Jira issue?
N/A - minor version updates only
How should this be tested?
CI
Questions: