Skip to content

Fully remove ThinClient from bench-tps#132

Merged
gregcusack merged 1 commit intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
gregcusack:remove-thin-client-from-bench-tps
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Fully remove ThinClient from bench-tps#132
gregcusack merged 1 commit intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
gregcusack:remove-thin-client-from-bench-tps

Conversation

@gregcusack
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gregcusack gregcusack commented Mar 7, 2024

6th PR on the way to remove ThinClient completely.
See

This PR requires PR: #117 to be merged before this one!

Problem

ThinClient is deprecated, so we need to it from bench-tps

Summary of Changes

Fully remove ThinClient from bench-tps

@gregcusack gregcusack changed the title Remove ThinClient from bench-tps Fully remove ThinClient from bench-tps Mar 7, 2024
@gregcusack gregcusack force-pushed the remove-thin-client-from-bench-tps branch from 363af0a to 01f1dfe Compare March 12, 2024 03:47
@gregcusack gregcusack marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2024 03:49
@gregcusack gregcusack force-pushed the remove-thin-client-from-bench-tps branch from 01f1dfe to a81abff Compare March 12, 2024 16:39
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@CriesofCarrots CriesofCarrots left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

\o/ Thanks for you patience through this!

@gregcusack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

\o/ Thanks for you patience through this!

haha i should be thanking you! thank you!

@gregcusack gregcusack merged commit 8c446f2 into anza-xyz:master Mar 12, 2024
@gregcusack gregcusack deleted the remove-thin-client-from-bench-tps branch March 12, 2024 18:41
codebender828 pushed a commit to codebender828/agave that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
remove ThinClient from bench-tps
OliverNChalk pushed a commit to OliverNChalk/agave that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2025
…z#132)

Previous version was just broken.  It is supposed to forward execution
to an implementation that is in the source tree, but it was looking for
the implementation in the wrong location.

`git rev-parse --git-dir` is a more robust way.  And we need `git` to
work for this script to make any sense.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants