follow conventions for to_* methods #319
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Please use a "subsystem" prefix, for the title, such as ( |
|
Review of
|
`Error` is `Copy`, so no changes are required to callers Signed-off-by: Alex Gaynor <[email protected]>
|
LGTM! |
|
By the way, the branch was created in the main repo by the Web interface? That... is a bit bad :D |
|
That's what I get for thinking this PR was too simple to bother creating a local branch :-) |
metaspace
pushed a commit
to metaspace/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: Rust-for-Linux#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
When the following snippet is run, lockdep will report a deadlock[1].
/* Acquire all queues dim_locks */
for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
mutex_lock(&vi->rq[i].dim_lock);
There's no deadlock here because the vq locks are always taken
in the same order, but lockdep can not figure it out. So refactoring
the code to alleviate the problem.
[1]
========================================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.9.0-rc7+ #319 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
ethtool/962 is trying to acquire lock:
but task is already holding lock:
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&vi->rq[i].dim_lock);
lock(&vi->rq[i].dim_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by ethtool/962:
#0: ffffffff82dbaab0 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x19/0x40
#1: ffffffff82dad0a8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
ethnl_default_set_doit+0xbe/0x1e0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 962 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7+ #319
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xb0
check_deadlock+0x130/0x220
__lock_acquire+0x861/0x990
lock_acquire.part.0+0x72/0x1d0
? lock_acquire+0xf8/0x130
__mutex_lock+0x71/0xd50
virtnet_set_coalesce+0x151/0x190
__ethnl_set_coalesce.isra.0+0x3f8/0x4d0
ethnl_set_coalesce+0x34/0x90
ethnl_default_set_doit+0xdd/0x1e0
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdc/0x130
genl_family_rcv_msg+0x154/0x230
? __pfx_ethnl_default_set_doit+0x10/0x10
genl_rcv_msg+0x4b/0xa0
? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
netlink_rcv_skb+0x5a/0x110
genl_rcv+0x28/0x40
netlink_unicast+0x1af/0x280
netlink_sendmsg+0x20e/0x460
__sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x210
? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
? do_user_addr_fault+0x3a2/0x8a0
? __lock_release+0x5e/0x160
? do_user_addr_fault+0x3a2/0x8a0
? lock_release+0x72/0x140
? do_user_addr_fault+0x3a7/0x8a0
__x64_sys_sendto+0x29/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x78/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Fixes: 4d4ac2e ("virtio_net: Add a lock for per queue RX coalesce")
Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
Commit 76d54bf ("nvme-tcp: don't access released socket during error recovery") added a mutex_lock() call for the queue->queue_lock in nvme_tcp_get_address(). However, the mutex_lock() races with mutex_destroy() in nvme_tcp_free_queue(), and causes the WARN below. DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 34077 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220 Modules linked in: nvmet_tcp nvmet nvme_tcp nvme_fabrics iw_cm ib_cm ib_core pktcdvd nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables qrtr sunrpc ppdev 9pnet_virtio 9pnet pcspkr netfs parport_pc parport e1000 i2c_piix4 i2c_smbus loop fuse nfnetlink zram bochs drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper ttm drm_kms_helper xfs drm sym53c8xx floppy nvme scsi_transport_spi nvme_core nvme_auth serio_raw ata_generic pata_acpi dm_multipath qemu_fw_cfg [last unloaded: ib_uverbs] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 34077 Comm: udisksd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7 #319 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220 Code: 08 84 d2 0f 85 c8 04 00 00 8b 15 ef b6 c8 01 85 d2 0f 85 78 f4 ff ff 48 c7 c6 20 93 ee af 48 c7 c7 60 91 ee af e8 f0 a7 6d fd <0f> 0b e9 5e f4 ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 f2 48 c1 RSP: 0018:ffff88811305f760 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88812c652058 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff88811305f8b0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1075c36341 R10: ffff8883ae1b1a0b R11: 0000000000010498 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff88812c652058 FS: 00007f9713ae4980(0000) GS:ffff8883ae180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcd78483c7c CR3: 0000000122c38000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn.cold+0x5b/0x1af ? __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220 ? report_bug+0x1ec/0x390 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? __mutex_lock+0xcf0/0x1220 ? nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __lock_acquire+0xd6a/0x59e0 ? nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_get_address+0xc2/0x1e0 [nvme_tcp] ? __pfx_nvme_tcp_get_address+0x10/0x10 [nvme_tcp] nvme_sysfs_show_address+0x81/0xc0 [nvme_core] dev_attr_show+0x42/0x80 ? __asan_memset+0x1f/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x1f0/0x370 seq_read_iter+0x2cb/0x1130 ? rw_verify_area+0x3b1/0x590 ? __mutex_lock+0x433/0x1220 vfs_read+0x6a6/0xa20 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10 ksys_read+0xf7/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10 ? __x64_sys_openat+0x105/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f9713f55cfa Code: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 55 e8 48 89 75 f0 89 7d f8 e8 e8 74 f8 ff 48 8b 55 e8 48 8b 75 f0 41 89 c0 8b 7d f8 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 2e 44 89 c7 48 89 45 f8 e8 42 75 f8 ff 48 8b RSP: 002b:00007ffd7f512e70 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055c38f316859 RCX: 00007f9713f55cfa RDX: 0000000000000fff RSI: 00007ffd7f512eb0 RDI: 0000000000000011 RBP: 00007ffd7f512e90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055c38f317148 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f96f4004f30 R15: 000055c3b6b623c0 </TASK> The WARN is observed when the blktests test case nvme/014 is repeated with tcp transport. It is rare, and 200 times repeat is required to recreate in some test environments. To avoid the WARN, check the NVME_TCP_Q_LIVE flag before locking queue->queue_lock. The flag is cleared long time before the lock gets destroyed. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ErrorisCopy, so no changes are required to callersThis becomes a clippy warning in #288