Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Components - formcarry #14277

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

New Components - formcarry #14277

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Oct 10, 2024

Resolves #13199

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced enhanced API interaction methods for the Formcarry component, including submission retrieval and pagination.
    • Added a new module to monitor and process new form submissions efficiently.
  • Chores

    • Created a new package.json file for the @pipedream/formcarry component, outlining dependencies and configuration.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Oct 11, 2024 3:14pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Oct 11, 2024 3:14pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Oct 11, 2024 3:14pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request involve a significant restructuring of the formcarry application component. Key modifications include the removal of the propDefinitions object and the introduction of several new private methods for managing API interactions. Additionally, a new method for listing submissions and an asynchronous generator for pagination have been added. A new package.json file has been created for the @pipedream/formcarry component, and a new module for monitoring form submissions has been introduced, which includes event processing capabilities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/formcarry/formcarry.app.mjs Removed propDefinitions; added methods: _baseUrl, _headers, _makeRequest, listSubmissions, paginate.
components/formcarry/package.json Introduced new package.json for @pipedream/formcarry, specifying metadata and dependencies.
components/formcarry/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs Added a new module for monitoring new form submissions, including event processing methods and state management.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Emit new event when your form receives a new submission (#[13199])

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ai-assisted, trigger / source

🐰 "In the fields where forms do bloom,
New submissions chase away the gloom.
With methods fresh and pagination neat,
Our formcarry dance is now complete!
So hop along, let events take flight,
For every form, a joyful sight!" 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 401bd9f and 02c4b84.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/formcarry/package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/formcarry/package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/formcarry/formcarry.app.mjs (1)

42-46: Set default pagination parameters more flexibly

Currently, the pagination parameters limit and page are hardcoded to 50 and 1, respectively. Consider allowing these defaults to be overridden through the args parameter for greater flexibility.

You can modify the code as follows:

 params: {
   ...args?.params,
-  limit: 50,
-  page: 1,
+  limit: args?.params?.limit || 50,
+  page: args?.params?.page || 1,
 },
components/formcarry/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs (1)

38-43: Enhance Event Summary for Better Clarity

The current event summary only includes the submission ID, which might not be informative for users monitoring multiple forms. Consider including the form ID or a key piece of submission data to make the summary more descriptive.

Apply this diff to improve the event summary:

- summary: `New Form Submission ID: ${submission._id}`,
+ summary: `New submission for Form ID ${this.formId}: ${submission._id}`,

Or, if the submission includes a recognizable field like name or email:

+ const { _id, fields } = submission;
+ const summary = fields.email ? `New submission from ${fields.email}` : `New submission ID: ${_id}`;
...
- summary: `New Form Submission ID: ${submission._id}`,
+ summary,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edd4923 and 401bd9f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/formcarry/formcarry.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/formcarry/package.json (1 hunks)
  • components/formcarry/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/formcarry/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/formcarry/formcarry.app.mjs (2)

58-59: Confirm the termination condition in the pagination loop

The loop condition while (nextPage); relies on nextPage being falsy to terminate. Please verify that nextPage becomes a falsy value when there are no additional pages. An incorrect termination condition could lead to an infinite loop.

Run the following script to examine how next_page values are used:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the possible values of `pagination.next_page`.

# Test: Search for assignments and usages of `pagination.next_page`. Expect: Proper handling when `next_page` is null or undefined.
rg --type js --pcre2 -A 2 'pagination\.next_page'

# Note: Ensure that `next_page` accurately reflects the end of pagination.

10-14: Verify the authentication method in _headers()

The _headers() method sets the api_key in the headers. Please confirm if api_key is the correct header field expected by the Formcarry API. Some APIs require the API key to be sent in an Authorization header or as a query parameter.

Consider running the following script to check the usage of api_key across the codebase:

components/formcarry/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs (1)

58-65: Verify the Order of Submissions Returned by the API

To ensure the logic in processEvent functions correctly, confirm that the listSubmissions API returns submissions in descending order of createdAt. If the API returns submissions in a different order, the current logic may skip or duplicate submissions.

Run the following script to verify the submission order:

Ensure that the timestamps are in descending order. If not, you may need to sort the submissions array before processing.

Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927, I just added a suggestion.

components/formcarry/package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927, LGTM! Ready for QA!

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 792d115 into master Oct 15, 2024
12 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-13199 branch October 15, 2024 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] formcarry
2 participants