New Components - moaform #14133
New Components - moaform #14133
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Moaform
participant API
participant Database
User->>Moaform: Submit Form
Moaform->>API: Create Webhook
API-->>Moaform: Webhook Created
Moaform->>Database: Store Webhook ID
Moaform->>User: Acknowledge Submission
Moaform->>Moaform: Emit Submission Event
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Submission (Instant)
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/moaform/moaform.app.mjs (1)
35-43: Set default HTTP method in_makeRequestTo simplify API calls and prevent errors when a method is not specified, consider setting a default HTTP method in the
_makeRequestmethod.You can set the default method to
"GET":_makeRequest({ - $ = this, path, ...opts + $ = this, path, method = "GET", ...opts }) { return axios($, { url: this._baseUrl() + path, + method, headers: this._headers(), ...opts, }); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- components/moaform/moaform.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/moaform/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/moaform/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for adding new features without breaking changes, which aligns with the PR objectives of introducing new moaform components.
13-14: PublishConfig setting is correct.The
"access": "public"setting inpublishConfigis appropriate for a package that should be publicly accessible on npm.
15-17: Verify the new dependency.The addition of
@pipedream/platformas a dependency is likely necessary for the new moaform components. However, let's verify its usage in the codebase.components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
10-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider using environment variables for base URLs and clarify placeholder values.
The URLs in the test event object are using HTTPS and seem consistent in their domain usage. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
It's generally a good practice to use environment variables or constants for base URLs. This makes it easier to manage different environments (e.g., development, staging, production) and update URLs across the application if needed.
The
answer_urlcontains a placeholder value "not-started-collecting".Consider refactoring the URLs to use environment variables or constants for the base URLs. For example:
const MOAFORM_BASE_URL = process.env.MOAFORM_BASE_URL || 'https://www.moaform.com'; const ANSWER_MOAFORM_BASE_URL = process.env.ANSWER_MOAFORM_BASE_URL || 'https://answer.moaform.com'; // Then in the object: "report_url": `${MOAFORM_BASE_URL}/reports/q945EegynYD8G2xM`, "answer_url": `${MOAFORM_BASE_URL}/q/not-started-collecting`, // ... "url": `${ANSWER_MOAFORM_BASE_URL}/answers/MG7eAk/thankyou/Wo2b1Z09wx5`Could you please clarify the purpose of the "not-started-collecting" placeholder in the
answer_url? Is this a special value used in the moaform API, or should it be replaced with a more generic placeholder for the test event?To verify the usage of this placeholder, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'not-started-collecting' in the moaform component echo "Searching for 'not-started-collecting' usage:" rg --type javascript 'not-started-collecting' components/moaformThis will help us understand if this placeholder is used consistently across the component or if it's specific to this test event.
Also applies to: 15-16
1-18: LGTM! Consider adding explanatory comments and clarifying empty fields.The structure of the test event object is well-organized and contains appropriate properties for representing a form submission event. Good job on using UUIDs for
event_idandresponse_id, and the ISO 8601 format for thesubmitted_attimestamp.Consider adding a comment at the top of the file explaining the purpose of this test event and how it should be used. This will help other developers understand the context and usage of this module.
Could you please clarify the following:
- Is the empty
answersarray intentional for this test event? If so, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining why it's empty.- What is the purpose of the empty
hiddenobject? If it's meant to be populated in real events, consider adding a comment to explain its usage.To help verify the usage of these fields in the actual component, you can run the following script:
This will help us understand how these fields are used in the actual implementation and whether their empty state in the test event is appropriate.
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
answersandhiddenfields are only used within thetest-event.mjsfile and are intentionally left empty for testing purposes. No issues found with their implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'answers' and 'hidden' fields in the moaform component # Search for 'answers' usage echo "Searching for 'answers' usage:" rg --type javascript 'answers' components/moaform # Search for 'hidden' usage echo "Searching for 'hidden' usage:" rg --type javascript 'hidden' components/moaformLength of output: 442
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'answers' and 'hidden' fields in the moaform component # Search for 'answers' usage in .js and .mjs files echo "Searching for 'answers' usage:" rg 'answers' components/moaform --glob "*.js" --glob "*.mjs" # Search for 'hidden' usage in .js and .mjs files echo "Searching for 'hidden' usage:" rg 'hidden' components/moaform --glob "*.js" --glob "*.mjs"Length of output: 576
components/moaform/moaform.app.mjs (2)
11-16: Verify pagination handling informIdoptions methodIn the
async options({ page })function, you are incrementing the page number by 1 (page: page + 1). Please verify whether the API's pagination starts from0or1. Incorrect pagination could lead to skipped pages or repeated data.To confirm the correct starting page number, run the following script:
6-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionHandle pagination comprehensively in
formIdprop definitionThe
async optionsmethod forformIdmay not retrieve all forms if there are multiple pages of results. Currently, it fetches only a single page. To ensure all forms are available for selection, consider implementing a loop or recursive fetching mechanism to gather all pages.Implement a while loop to fetch all pages:
async options({ page }) { - const { items } = await this.getForms({ - params: { - page: page + 1, - }, - }); - return items.map(({ - id: value, title: label, - }) => ({ - label, - value, - })); + const forms = []; + let currentPage = 1; + let totalPages = 1; + do { + const response = await this.getForms({ + params: { + page: currentPage, + }, + }); + forms.push(...response.items); + totalPages = response.pages; + currentPage += 1; + } while (currentPage <= totalPages); + return forms.map(({ id: value, title: label }) => ({ + label, + value, + })); },Run the following script to confirm the total number of pages:
components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/moaform/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-30: LGTM! Consider simplifying the object structure.The
RETENTION_DAYS_OPTIONSconstant is well-structured and provides a clear set of retention period options. The naming is appropriate, and the export makes it accessible for use in other modules.Consider simplifying the object structure by removing the
labelproperty, as it's redundant with thevalue. You can generate the label dynamically when needed. This would make the constant more concise and easier to maintain:export const RETENTION_DAYS_OPTIONS = [1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 30];Then, when using this constant, you can map it to the required structure:
const options = RETENTION_DAYS_OPTIONS.map(days => ({ label: days.toString(), value: days, }));This approach reduces duplication and makes it easier to add or modify options in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- components/moaform/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/moaform/sources/new-submission-instant/new-submission-instant.mjs
Resolves #14132.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
formIdfor monitoring form submissions.Bug Fixes
Documentation
package.jsonwith new dependencies and version increment.