Tricentis QTest new components #14137
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new actions for interacting with the Tricentis qTest API, including creating, retrieving, updating requirements, and defects. A new utility module is added for managing field properties. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TricentisAPI
participant RequirementModule
participant DefectModule
User->>RequirementModule: Create Requirement
RequirementModule->>TricentisAPI: createRequirement()
TricentisAPI-->>RequirementModule: Requirement Created
RequirementModule-->>User: Confirmation Message
User->>DefectModule: Submit Defect
DefectModule->>TricentisAPI: createDefect()
TricentisAPI-->>DefectModule: Defect Submitted
DefectModule-->>User: Confirmation Message
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/get-defect/get-defect.mjs (2)
3-8: LGTM: Action definition is well-structured.The action definition follows Pipedream conventions and provides essential information. The key, name, version, and type are all correctly set.
Consider expanding the description to provide more context about what a "defect" represents in qTest and what kind of details users can expect to retrieve. This could help users better understand the action's purpose and output.
27-37: LGTM: Run method is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The run method is correctly implemented as an async function and follows good practices:
- Proper destructuring of props
- Efficient use of the spread operator for passing arguments
- Exporting a summary for user feedback
- Returning the response for potential further processing
Consider adding error handling to provide more informative feedback to users in case of API failures. Here's a suggested implementation:
async run({ $ }) { const { tricentisQtest, ...args } = this; try { const response = await tricentisQtest.getDefect({ $, ...args, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched defect (ID: ${args.defectId})`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch defect (ID: ${args.defectId})`); throw error; } }This change will provide clearer feedback to users when an error occurs during the API call.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/get-requirement/get-requirement.mjs (1)
27-37: LGTM: Run method is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The run method is correctly structured and implements the required functionality. It properly uses the Pipedream $ object and provides a helpful summary message.
Consider adding error handling to provide more informative error messages to users. Here's a suggested implementation:
async run({ $ }) { const { tricentisQtest, ...args } = this; try { const response = await tricentisQtest.getRequirement({ $, ...args, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched requirement (ID: ${args.requirementId})`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch requirement (ID: ${args.requirementId})`); throw error; } }This change will provide clearer feedback to users when an error occurs during the API call.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/submit-defect/submit-defect.mjs (2)
23-28: Methods look good, but consider adding a comment for getProperties.The
getDataFields()method appropriately retrieves defect fields from the Tricentis qTest app.However, the
getPropertiesmethod is imported from a utility file and its implementation is not visible here. Consider adding a brief comment explaining its purpose and functionality to improve code readability.Add a comment above the
getPropertiesline:getDataFields() { return this.tricentisQtest.getDefectFields(this.projectId); }, + // Utility function to process and format properties for API submission getProperties,
29-42: Run function looks good, but consider adding error handling.The run function efficiently handles the defect submission process using destructuring and the spread operator. The summary message provides useful feedback on successful submission.
However, there's no visible error handling in this function.
Consider adding a try-catch block to handle potential errors:
async run({ $ }) { const { // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars tricentisQtest, projectId, getProperties, getDataFields, ...fields } = this; + try { const response = await tricentisQtest.createDefect({ $, projectId, data: { properties: getProperties(fields), }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully submitted defect (ID: ${response.id})`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to submit defect: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },This change will provide more informative error messages and ensure that errors are properly propagated.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/update-defect/update-defect.mjs (2)
12-31: LGTM: Props are well-defined, with a suggestion for improvement.The props definition covers the necessary inputs for updating a defect, including project and defect IDs. The
reloadPropsflag ondefectIdis a good UX consideration.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
additionalPropsproperty, as its functionality isn't immediately clear from the code.
38-52: LGTM: Run method implementation is solid, with a suggestion for improvement.The
runmethod correctly implements the defect update functionality, using the provided props and methods. The success message export provides clear feedback to the user.Consider adding explicit error handling to provide more detailed feedback in case of API errors. For example:
async run({ $ }) { const { /* ... */ } = this; try { const response = await tricentisQtest.updateDefect({ // ... }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated defect (ID: ${defectId})`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to update defect (ID: ${defectId})`); throw error; } }This would provide more context in case of failures while still allowing Pipedream to handle the error.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/create-requirement/create-requirement.mjs (1)
44-45: Consider removing the eslint-disable comment if possible.There's an eslint-disable comment for no-unused-vars. It's generally better to avoid disabling linter rules. Consider refactoring the code to use all destructured variables or use the rest operator to collect unused ones without naming them explicitly.
For example, you could change:
const { // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars tricentisQtest, projectId, parentId, name, getProperties, getDataFields, ...fields } = this;to:
const { tricentisQtest, projectId, parentId, name, getProperties, ...fields } = this;This way, you don't need to destructure
getDataFieldsif it's not used, eliminating the need for the eslint-disable comment.components/tricentis_qtest/actions/update-requirement/update-requirement.mjs (2)
12-36: Props are well-defined, but consider adding validation for thenameprop.The props are correctly structured with appropriate dependencies and reloading behavior. However, consider adding validation for the
nameprop to ensure it meets any required criteria (e.g., minimum length).Example:
name: { type: "string", label: "Name", description: "Requirement name", optional: false, min: 1, },
43-65: Therunmethod is well-structured, but consider adding error handling.The method effectively updates the requirement and provides a summary. However, to improve robustness, consider adding error handling:
async run({ $ }) { const { /* ... */ } = this; try { const response = await tricentisQtest.updateRequirement({ // ... }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated requirement (ID: ${requirementId})`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to update requirement (ID: ${requirementId})`); throw error; } }This will provide more informative feedback in case of failures.
components/tricentis_qtest/common/utils.mjs (1)
19-19: Consider renaming theisUpdatevariable for clarity.The variable
isUpdatemight not clearly convey its purpose. Since it checks for the presence ofrequirementIdordefectId, consider renaming it to something likehasExistingEntityorisExistingEntityfor better readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- components/parsera/parsera.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/actions/create-requirement/create-requirement.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/actions/get-defect/get-defect.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/actions/get-requirement/get-requirement.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/actions/submit-defect/submit-defect.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/actions/update-defect/update-defect.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/actions/update-requirement/update-requirement.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/parsera/parsera.app.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
components/tricentis_qtest/common/utils.mjs
[error] 8-8: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
[error] 9-10: The default clause should be the last switch clause.
The following case clause is here:
Regardless its position, the default clause is always executed when there is no match. To avoid confusion, the default clause should be the last switch clause.
(lint/suspicious/useDefaultSwitchClauseLast)
🔇 Additional comments (30)
components/tricentis_qtest/package.json (2)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for introducing new components or features, as mentioned in the PR objectives. This change follows semantic versioning principles.
Line range hint
1-18: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The version update and new dependency addition are consistent with introducing new Tricentis qTest components. However, please ensure that the @pipedream/platform dependency is necessary and that the version is appropriate for your needs.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/get-defect/get-defect.mjs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly references the main Tricentis qTest app file, following the expected pattern for Pipedream components.
9-26: LGTM: Props are well-defined and follow best practices.The props definition is correct and follows Pipedream's best practices:
- Use of
propDefinitionforprojectIdanddefectIdpromotes reusability.- The dependency of
defectIdonprojectIdensures proper context for fetching defects.
1-38: Overall, excellent implementation of the "Get Defect" action.This new action aligns well with the PR objectives, specifically addressing the "Get a Defect by its ID" requirement from the linked issue #14077. The implementation follows Pipedream's best practices and conventions, providing a clean and efficient way to retrieve defect details from the Tricentis qTest API.
Key strengths:
- Proper structure and naming conventions
- Reusable prop definitions
- Clear and concise implementation
Suggested improvements:
- Expand the action description for better user understanding
- Implement error handling in the run method
These minor enhancements will further improve the robustness and user-friendliness of the action. Great work on this implementation!
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/get-requirement/get-requirement.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the main app file for the Tricentis qTest integration.
3-8: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is correctly structured and provides clear information about the action's purpose and functionality. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is particularly helpful for users.
9-26: LGTM: Props are well-defined and logically structured.The props definition is correct and follows best practices:
- It uses propDefinitions from the main app file for consistency.
- The dependency of
requirementIdonprojectIdensures proper context for fetching requirements.
1-38: Overall, excellent implementation of the "Get Requirement" action.This new action successfully addresses the "Get a Requirement" objective from the linked issue #14077. The implementation is clean, well-structured, and follows Pipedream's best practices. It provides a solid foundation for retrieving requirement details from the Tricentis qTest API.
Key strengths:
- Clear and descriptive action metadata
- Well-defined props with logical dependencies
- Efficient run method implementation
The only suggested improvement is to add error handling in the run method, as mentioned in the previous comment.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/submit-defect/submit-defect.mjs (4)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly bringing in the necessary utility functions and the Tricentis qTest app, which are essential for the module's functionality.
6-11: LGTM: Action configuration is well-defined and informative.The action configuration is properly set up with a unique key, descriptive name, and informative description that includes a link to the API documentation. The version "0.0.1" is appropriate for a new component.
1-43: Overall, the implementation is solid and meets the PR objectives.This new "Submit Defect" action for Tricentis qTest is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The code is clean, efficient, and follows good practices. A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Clarify the purpose of
additionalProps.- Add a comment explaining the
getPropertiesmethod.- Implement error handling in the
runfunction.These suggestions are minor and don't affect the core functionality. Great job on implementing this new component!
12-22: Props configuration looks good, but clarification needed on additionalProps.The props configuration is well-structured, including the Tricentis qTest app and projectId with appropriate propDefinitions. The reloadProps flag on projectId is a good practice to ensure dependent fields are updated when the project changes.
However, there's an
additionalPropsproperty on line 22 that's not clearly defined within this file.Could you please clarify the purpose and implementation of
additionalProps? Let's verify its implementation:components/tricentis_qtest/actions/update-defect/update-defect.mjs (4)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and module structure are appropriate.The imports and overall module structure follow Pipedream's conventions and include the necessary utilities for the action.
6-11: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is complete, including a clear name, description, version, and a link to the relevant API documentation. This provides good context for users of the action.
32-37: LGTM: Methods are concise and utilize existing utilities.The
getDataFieldsandgetPropertiesmethods are well-defined and make use of existing utility functions, promoting code reuse and maintainability.
1-53: Overall assessment: Well-implemented "Update Defect" action.This implementation successfully addresses the "Update a Defect" objective from the linked issue. The code is well-structured, follows Pipedream's conventions, and makes good use of existing utilities. The minor suggestions for improvement (adding a comment for
additionalPropsand implementing explicit error handling) would further enhance the code's clarity and robustness.Great job on this implementation!
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/create-requirement/create-requirement.mjs (5)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly bringing in the necessary utility functions and the Tricentis qTest app, which are essential for the action's functionality.
6-11: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined and informative.The action metadata is correctly structured with an appropriate key, name, description, version, and type. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is particularly helpful for users.
12-36: LGTM: Props are well-defined and utilize propDefinitions effectively.The props definition is comprehensive and well-structured:
- It correctly uses propDefinitions for projectId and parentId, promoting consistency and reusability.
- The reloadProps flag on parentId ensures it's updated when the project changes, which is a good UX consideration.
- The name prop is appropriately defined as a required string.
The use of additionalProps at the end allows for flexible extension of the props if needed.
37-42: LGTM: Methods are concise and utilize the Tricentis qTest app effectively.The methods definition is well-structured:
getDataFieldscorrectly uses thetricentisQtestapp to fetch requirement fields for the specific project.getPropertiesis imported from a utility file, promoting code reuse and maintainability.These methods provide the necessary functionality for handling requirement fields and properties.
43-60: LGTM: Run method implementation is comprehensive and well-structured.The run method effectively implements the requirement creation process:
- It correctly destructures the props and separates additional fields.
- The
createRequirementcall includes all necessary parameters.- The response handling and summary export provide good user feedback.
The implementation aligns well with the Tricentis qTest API for creating requirements.
components/tricentis_qtest/actions/update-requirement/update-requirement.mjs (4)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly bringing in the necessary utility functions and the main app module. The use of destructuring in the import statement enhances code readability.
6-11: LGTM: Action definition is well-structured and informative.The action definition follows the expected structure for Pipedream actions. The inclusion of a link to the official API documentation in the description is particularly helpful for users.
37-42: LGTM: Methods are concise and utilize the Tricentis qTest app instance effectively.The
getDataFields()andgetPropertiesmethods are well-defined and make appropriate use of the Tricentis qTest app instance and imported utilities.
1-65: Overall, the implementation is solid and meets the PR objectives.This new component successfully implements the "Update Requirement" action for Tricentis qTest, addressing one of the key objectives from the linked issue #14077. The code is well-structured, follows Pipedream's component patterns, and includes appropriate documentation.
Minor improvements have been suggested for prop validation and error handling, but these are not critical issues. The component is ready for integration, pending these small enhancements.
components/tricentis_qtest/common/utils.mjs (3)
29-29: Double-check the logic for theoptionalproperty.The
optionalproperty is set usingisUpdate || !required. This means a field is optional if it's an update operation or if the field is not required. Verify that this aligns with the desired behavior, especially for create and update operations where required fields might differ.
46-54: Ensureidformat is consistent ingetPropertiesfunction.In the
getPropertiesfunction,field_idis extracted usingid.split("_").pop(). This assumes thatidalways contains an underscore. Ifiddoes not contain an underscore, the entireidwill be used. Confirm that this is acceptable or consider adding validation to handle unexpected formats.
24-41: Verify handling of field types and options ingetFieldProps.Ensure that the mapping of
attribute_typeto generic types viagetFieldTypecovers all possible field types returned bythis.getDataFields(). If new or unexpected field types are introduced, they may default to"string", which might not be appropriate.Run the following script to list all unique
attribute_typevalues:Replace
fields.jsonwith the actual JSON file containing field data.components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs (1)
95-106: LGTM for_makeRequestmethodThe
_makeRequestmethod is well-implemented, correctly handling API requests with the necessary authorization headers and options spread.
|
Oi @GTFalcao, I am the Thinqist PO for the Pipedream qTest service. We really appreciate your work! Muito Obrigado! Você sabe quando estará disponível para uso experimental pelo Tricentis e Thinqist PSO? (Eu sou Americano mas falo um pouco Portuguese:). We have an opportunity to demo to a large group of leaders and customer next week in Chicago, and hope to have a demo preparar:). |
|
Hi @dougbock , hopefully these components will be released within the next few days. If you wish to use the components in a beta state while they are not released, you can e.g. Then you can use the published component in a workflow under 'my actions' when creating an action step. See the documentation on this if needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/cliento/cliento.app.mjs (1)
Line range hint
6-9: Review theauthKeys()method for security implicationsThe
authKeys()method logs the keys ofthis.$authto the console. While this can be useful for debugging, it raises some concerns:
- Security: Logging authentication-related information, even if it's just the keys, could potentially expose sensitive data structures.
- Production readiness: Debug logging should typically be removed or disabled in production code.
Consider the following improvements:
- Implement proper debug logging that can be toggled based on the environment.
- Ensure that no sensitive information is logged.
- If this is intended for development only, consider moving it to a separate development utilities file.
Here's a suggested improvement:
methods: { // Development utility to inspect auth structure authKeys() { if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') { console.log('Auth object structure:', Object.keys(this.$auth)); } }, },This change ensures the method only logs in non-production environments.
components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1)
Remove or restrict the
authKeys()method across all components.The
authKeys()method is found in multiple files and logs authentication-related information to the console. This widespread usage could pose a significant security risk if left in production code.Actions to consider:
- Remove the method entirely if it's no longer necessary.
- Restrict the method to development environments to prevent exposure of sensitive data in production.
Example of restricting to development:
methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data authKeys() { if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); } }, },🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
6-9: Remove or restrict theauthKeys()method to development environments.The
authKeys()method logs authentication-related information to the console, which could pose a security risk if left in production code. While this method may be useful for debugging during development, it's not advisable to keep it in the final version.Consider the following options:
- Remove the method entirely if it's no longer needed.
- If the method is still required for debugging, ensure it's only accessible in development environments.
Example of restricting to development:
methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data authKeys() { if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); } }, },To ensure this method isn't used elsewhere in the codebase, run the following command:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of the authKeys method rg --type javascript 'authKeys\s*\(\s*\)'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of the authKeys method in .js and .mjs files rg 'authKeys\s*\(\s*\)' --glob '*.js' --glob '*.mjs'Length of output: 37007
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- components/ambee/ambee.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/burstyai/burstyai.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/cliento/cliento.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/franconnect/franconnect.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/helpspot/helpspot.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/stealthgpt/stealthgpt.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- components/ambee/ambee.app.mjs
- components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs
- components/burstyai/burstyai.app.mjs
- components/franconnect/franconnect.app.mjs
- components/helpspot/helpspot.app.mjs
- components/stealthgpt/stealthgpt.app.mjs
- components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs (5)
Learnt from: GTFalcao PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14137 File: components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs:39-54 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z Learning: The Tricentis qTest API endpoint used for fetching requirements does not support pagination, so pagination is unnecessary in the `options` method for `requirementId`.Learnt from: GTFalcao PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14137 File: components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs:39-54 Timestamp: 2024-09-29T22:37:26.269Z Learning: The Tricentis qTest API endpoint used for fetching requirements does not support pagination, so pagination is unnecessary in the `options` method for `requirementId`.Learnt from: GTFalcao PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14137 File: components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs:60-88 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z Learning: The Tricentis qTest API's `getDefects` endpoint does not support pagination.Learnt from: GTFalcao PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14137 File: components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs:60-88 Timestamp: 2024-09-29T22:37:18.597Z Learning: The Tricentis qTest API's `getDefects` endpoint does not support pagination.Learnt from: GTFalcao PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14137 File: components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs:60-88 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:40.185Z Learning: The Tricentis qTest API's `getDefects` endpoint does not support pagination.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/cliento/cliento.app.mjs (1)
11-11: LGTM: Newline at end of fileThe addition of a newline at the end of the file follows best practices for version control systems and adheres to common linting rules.
components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1)
11-11: LGTM: Newline added at the end of the file.Adding a newline at the end of the file is a good practice. It's often required by linters and makes diffs cleaner in version control systems.
components/tricentis_qtest/tricentis_qtest.app.mjs (2)
95-106:_makeRequestmethod is well-implementedThe
_makeRequestmethod correctly sets up the axios request with the base URL and includes the appropriate headers, ensuring that API requests are properly authenticated and configured.
7-20:projectIdprop definition is correctly implementedThe
projectIdprop definition properly retrieves the list of projects and maps them to selectable options, facilitating user selection of a project.
| const defects = await this.getDefects({ | ||
| projectId, | ||
| params: { | ||
| page: page + 1, | ||
| startTime, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary pagination parameters
The options method for defectId includes a page parameter and passes it to the getDefects API call. As the Tricentis qTest API's getDefects endpoint does not support pagination, passing the page parameter is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.
| const fields = await this.getDefectFields(projectId); | ||
| const summaryId = fields.find(({ label }) => label === "Summary")?.id; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize by caching defect fields
The options method for defectId calls getDefectFields(projectId) each time it's invoked to retrieve the fields and find the "Summary" field ID. To improve performance, consider caching the result of getDefectFields(projectId) to avoid making unnecessary API calls during options retrieval.
| async options({ | ||
| page = 0, projectId, | ||
| }) { | ||
| const requirements = await this.getRequirements({ | ||
| projectId, | ||
| params: { | ||
| page: page + 1, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary pagination parameters
The options method for requirementId includes a page parameter and passes it to the getRequirements API call. Since the Tricentis qTest API endpoint for fetching requirements does not support pagination (as noted in previous learnings), passing the page parameter is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- components/tricentis_qtest/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/tricentis_qtest/common/utils.mjs (1)
28-28: Verify the logic for setting theoptionalpropertyThe
optionalproperty is set as:optional: isUpdate || !required,This means that during updates (
isUpdate === true), fields are marked as optional regardless of theirrequiredstatus. Please verify that this behavior aligns with the API requirements and that required fields during creation are indeed optional during updates.
| function getFieldType(type) { | ||
| switch (type) { | ||
| case "Number": | ||
| return "integer"; | ||
| case "ArrayNumber": | ||
| return "integer[]"; | ||
| default: | ||
| return "string"; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling additional field types in getFieldType function
Currently, the getFieldType function handles "Number" and "ArrayNumber" types, defaulting all other types to "string". To ensure accurate type mapping and prevent potential issues, consider explicitly handling additional fieldType values that the API might return, such as "Boolean", "Date", "ArrayString", etc.
| value: (type === "string" && typeof value !== "string") | ||
| ? value.toString() | ||
| : value, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null or undefined values in value
In the options mapping:
value: (type === "string" && typeof value !== "string")
? value.toString()
: value,Consider adding a check to handle cases where value might be null or undefined to prevent runtime errors when calling toString() on null or undefined.
Apply this diff to add a null check:
value: (type === "string" && typeof value !== "string")
- ? value.toString()
+ ? (value != null ? value.toString() : "")
: value,
|
/approve |
|
/approve |
Closes #14077
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Version Update
@pipedream/platform.Minor Changes