New Components - mural #14632
New Components - mural #14632
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes include the introduction of several new modules and enhancements to the existing Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
components/mural/sources/new-mural/new-mural.mjs (2)
7-7: Enhance the description with event payload details.The description should provide more information about what data is emitted in the event. Consider expanding it to include details about the mural ID, workspace ID, and any other relevant properties that consumers of this event would need to know.
- description: "Emit new event when a new mural is created.", + description: "Emits an event when a new mural is created. The event includes the mural ID, workspace ID, and creation timestamp.",
19-21: Review the polling strategy.The current sorting strategy might miss murals if multiple are created simultaneously. Consider implementing a more robust approach.
Suggestions:
- Use timestamp-based polling with microsecond precision
- Implement a window-based approach to catch multiple creations
- Consider adding a buffer period to catch near-simultaneous creations
Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation for any of these approaches?
components/mural/sources/new-area/new-area.mjs (2)
1-10: LGTM! Consider documenting version strategy.The module structure and metadata are well-defined. The unique deduplication strategy is appropriate for event sources to prevent duplicate processing.
Consider adding a comment about the versioning strategy (e.g., when to increment major/minor/patch versions) to help maintainers.
23-39: Add error handling and validation in methods.While the methods implementation is functional, it could benefit from additional error handling and validation.
Consider these improvements:
methods: { ...common.methods, getResourceFn() { return this.mural.listWidgets; }, getArgs() { + if (!this.muralId) { + throw new Error("muralId is required"); + } return { muralId: this.muralId, params: { type: "areas", }, }; }, getSummary(item) { + if (!item?.id) { + throw new Error("Invalid area widget: missing id"); + } return `New Area Widget ID: ${item.id}`; }, },components/mural/sources/new-sticky/new-sticky.mjs (1)
23-39: Enhance summary to include sticky content when available.The summary could be more informative by including the sticky content when available.
Consider enhancing the getSummary method:
getSummary(item) { - return `New Sticky Note ID: ${item.id}`; + const content = this.stickyContent ? ` with content: ${this.stickyContent}` : ''; + return `New Sticky Note ID: ${item.id}${content}`; },components/mural/sources/common/base.mjs (3)
5-20: Consider adding validation for workspaceId prop.While the props are well-structured, consider adding validation to ensure workspaceId is provided and valid before processing events.
workspaceId: { propDefinition: [ mural, "workspaceId", ], + validate: (value) => { + if (!value) { + throw new Error("workspaceId is required"); + } + return value; + }, },
21-25: Consider making the initial event limit configurable.The deploy hook uses a hard-coded limit of 25 events. Consider making this configurable through props to allow flexibility in initial data loading.
props: { + initialEventLimit: { + type: "integer", + label: "Initial Event Limit", + description: "Maximum number of events to process on deploy", + optional: true, + default: 25, + }, }, hooks: { async deploy() { - await this.processEvent(25); + await this.processEvent(this.initialEventLimit); }, },
1-85: Consider adding rate limiting, retries, and deduplication.To make this base implementation more robust, consider adding:
- Rate limiting mechanism to prevent API throttling
- Retry mechanism with exponential backoff for failed API calls
- Event deduplication to prevent duplicate processing
These improvements would make the polling mechanism more resilient and production-ready. Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these features?
components/mural/actions/create-mural/create-mural.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider semantic versioning strategy.The basic setup looks good with proper naming and documentation. Starting with version "0.0.1" is appropriate for a new component.
Consider documenting the versioning strategy for future updates:
- MAJOR version for breaking changes
- MINOR version for new features
- PATCH version for bug fixes
components/mural/actions/create-sticky/create-sticky.mjs (1)
35-44: Add validation for position coordinatesConsider adding min/max validation for xPosition and yPosition to ensure they fall within acceptable ranges.
xPosition: { type: "integer", label: "X Position", description: "The horizontal position of the widget in px. This is the distance from the left of the parent widget, such as an area. If the widget has no parent widget, this is the distance from the left of the mural.", + min: 0, }, yPosition: { type: "integer", label: "Y Position", description: "The vertical position of the widget in px. This is the distance from the top of the parent widget, such as an area. If the widget has no parent widget, this is the distance from the top of the mural.", + min: 0, },components/mural/mural.app.mjs (6)
20-25: Clarify variable names in options mapping for better readabilityIn the
optionsmapping forworkspaceId, usingvalueas both a variable and a property name can be confusing. Consider renaming variables to improve clarity.Apply this diff to clarify variable names:
- options: value?.map(({ - id: value, name: label, - }) => ({ - value, - label, - })) || [], + options: value?.map(({ id, name }) => ({ + value: id, + label: name, + })) || [],
48-53: Clarify variable names in options mapping for better readabilityIn the
optionsmapping formuralId, the use ofvaluefor both the variable and property name may cause confusion. Renaming variables can enhance readability.Apply this diff:
- options: value?.map(({ - id: value, title: label, - }) => ({ - value, - label, - })) || [], + options: value?.map(({ id, title }) => ({ + value: id, + label: title, + })) || [],
76-81: Clarify variable names in options mapping for better readabilityFor
roomId, consider renaming variables in theoptionsmapping to avoid confusion.Apply this diff:
- options: value?.map(({ - id: value, name: label, - }) => ({ - value, - label, - })) || [], + options: value?.map(({ id, name }) => ({ + value: id, + label: name, + })) || [],
105-110: Clarify variable names in options mapping for better readabilityIn the
optionsmapping fortagIds, renaming variables will improve code clarity.Apply this diff:
- options: value?.map(({ - id: value, text: label, - }) => ({ - value, - label, - })) || [], + options: value?.map(({ id, text }) => ({ + value: id, + label: text, + })) || [],
135-140: Clarify variable names in options mapping for better readabilityFor
widgetId, the variable naming in theoptionsmapping can be improved to enhance readability.Apply this diff:
- options: value?.map(({ - id: value, title: label, - }) => ({ - value, - label, - })) || [], + options: value?.map(({ id, title }) => ({ + value: id, + label: title, + })) || [],
11-146: Refactoroptionsmethods to reduce code duplicationThe
optionsmethods inpropDefinitionshave similar structures with repeated logic. Consider creating a generic helper function to minimize code duplication and enhance maintainability.For example, you could abstract the common logic into a utility function:
async function fetchOptions(fetchMethod, mappingFunc, params = {}, prevContext = {}) { const { value, next: nextToken, } = await fetchMethod({ params: { next: prevContext?.next, ...params, }, }); return { options: value?.map(mappingFunc) || [], context: { next: nextToken, }, }; }And then use it in your prop definitions:
async options({ prevContext }) { return this.fetchOptions( this.listWorkspaces.bind(this), ({ id, name }) => ({ value: id, label: name }), {}, prevContext, ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/mural/actions/create-mural/create-mural.mjs(1 hunks)components/mural/actions/create-sticky/create-sticky.mjs(1 hunks)components/mural/mural.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/mural/package.json(2 hunks)components/mural/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/mural/sources/new-area/new-area.mjs(1 hunks)components/mural/sources/new-mural/new-mural.mjs(1 hunks)components/mural/sources/new-sticky/new-sticky.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
components/mural/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features (Mural API components) while maintaining backward compatibility.
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility
Let's ensure we're using a secure and up-to-date version of the platform dependency.
✅ Verification successful
@pipedream/platform version 3.0.3 is up-to-date and secure
The package is using the latest available version (3.0.3) and there are no security advisories reported for this package. The version being used is from the most recent releases, indicating good maintenance practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version and security advisories for @pipedream/platform
# Check latest version from npm registry
echo "Latest @pipedream/platform version:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@pipedream/platform | jq -r '."dist-tags".latest'
# Check if version 3.0.3 is within the last 5 versions
echo -e "\nRecent versions:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@pipedream/platform | jq -r '.versions | keys | .[-5:]'
# Check for any security advisories
echo -e "\nSecurity advisories:"
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "@pipedream/platform") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 783
components/mural/sources/new-mural/new-mural.mjs (1)
3-28: Verify implementation against requirements.
The current implementation needs to be verified against the PR objectives for the "new-mural" polling source.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation meets requirements
The implementation correctly handles the required props and validation:
workspaceIdis properly defined as a required prop in the common base module- The prop is validated through the app's propDefinitions with proper type, label, and async options
- The implementation in new-mural.mjs correctly extends the common base and uses the validated workspaceId prop
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation matches requirements
# Check if props are properly validated in the common base module
echo "Checking common base module for props validation..."
rg -l "workspaceId|muralId|userId" "../common/base.mjs"
# Check if there are any other mural-related components that might need similar validation
echo "Checking other mural components..."
fd -e mjs -e jsx . ../../mural/ -x rg -l "workspaceId|muralId|userId" {}
Length of output: 483
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with correct paths relative to repository root
# Check for common base module
echo "Checking for common base module..."
fd "base.mjs" components/mural
# Check for props validation in mural components
echo "Checking mural components for props..."
fd -e mjs . components/mural -x rg -l "workspaceId|muralId|userId" {}
# Check app props definition
echo "Checking app props definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'prop: {
$$$
workspaceId: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 781
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the base.mjs and app.mjs content for prop validation
echo "Checking base.mjs content..."
cat components/mural/sources/common/base.mjs
echo -e "\nChecking app.mjs props definition..."
cat components/mural/mural.app.mjs
Length of output: 7338
components/mural/sources/new-area/new-area.mjs (1)
1-40: Verify event emission mechanism.
Let's ensure this component properly integrates with the event handling system.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the event emission mechanism by checking the base component implementation since the new area source extends from it.
Event emission mechanism is properly implemented
The event emission mechanism in the new-area component is correctly implemented through its base component. The base component:
- Implements a standard polling mechanism with proper timestamp tracking
- Handles pagination through the
paginatemethod - Correctly emits events using
this.$emit(item, meta)with proper metadata - The new-area component extends this base and implements the required methods:
getResourceFn()returnsthis.mural.listWidgetsgetArgs()returns the required parametersgetSummary()returns a formatted string with widget ID
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent event handling across mural components
# Check for event emission patterns in other mural components
echo "Checking event emission patterns..."
rg -l "emit\(" components/mural/
# Check for consistent error handling
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error($_)'
Length of output: 166573
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check base.mjs implementation for event emission
cat components/mural/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 1854
components/mural/sources/new-sticky/new-sticky.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Good use of code reuse pattern.
The module correctly imports and extends the common base configuration, promoting code reusability.
1-40: Verify sticky ID handling in event emission.
The PR objectives mention that both mural ID and sticky ID are required for the new-sticky event. Please verify that the sticky ID is properly handled in the event emission process.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how sticky IDs are handled in the mural components
# Search for sticky ID handling patterns
rg -A 5 "sticky.*id|id.*sticky" --type js
# Check the base implementation for event emission
ast-grep --pattern 'emit($$$)'5-10: Verify if this is the initial release version.
The metadata is well-structured and follows naming conventions. The version number "0.0.1" indicates this is an initial implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to verify this component's existence and version history.
Let me try one final search to verify if this is a new component by checking the entire mural component directory.
Version 0.0.1 is appropriate as this is indeed a new component
The git history shows this is a newly created component, with its first commit being made today (Nov 11, 2024) as part of the initial implementation. The version number 0.0.1 correctly reflects its status as a new component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this is truly a new component with no previous versions
# Search for any previous versions of this component
rg -l "key:\s*['\"]mural-new-sticky['\"]" --type js
Length of output: 651
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search specifically for the mural-new-sticky component
rg -l "mural-new-sticky" --type js
# Also check for any mural-related components to understand the component ecosystem
rg -l "key:\s*['\"]mural-" --type js
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in the mural component directory
fd . components/mural/
# Check git history for this specific file
git log --follow -- components/mural/sources/new-sticky/new-sticky.mjs
Length of output: 1039
components/mural/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean imports and module structure.
The imports are well-organized and the module structure follows best practices.
components/mural/actions/create-mural/create-mural.mjs (1)
78-94: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and response validation.
The run method needs proper error handling and response validation.
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.roomId || !this.title) {
+ throw new Error("Required fields roomId and title must be provided");
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.mural.createMural({
$,
data: {
roomId: this.roomId,
title: this.title,
backgroundColor: this.backgroundColor,
height: this.height,
width: this.width,
infinite: this.infinite,
timerSoundTheme: this.timerSoundTheme,
visitorAvatarTheme: this.visitorAvatarTheme,
},
});
+
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error("Failed to create mural: Invalid response format");
+ }
+
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created mural "${this.title}"`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create mural: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},Let's verify the createMural method exists in mural.app.mjs:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling suggestion can be simplified
The createMural method exists in mural.app.mjs and already handles HTTP requests through the _makeRequest method. Since the base method already handles API errors, we only need basic input validation.
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.roomId || !this.title) {
+ throw new Error("Required fields roomId and title must be provided");
+ }
+
const response = await this.mural.createMural({
$,
data: {
roomId: this.roomId,
title: this.title,
backgroundColor: this.backgroundColor,
height: this.height,
width: this.width,
infinite: this.infinite,
timerSoundTheme: this.timerSoundTheme,
visitorAvatarTheme: this.visitorAvatarTheme,
},
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created mural "${this.title}"`);
return response;
},🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the createMural method exists in mural.app.mjs
rg -A 5 "createMural.*=.*{" "components/mural/mural.app.mjs"
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the createMural method
rg -A 10 "createMural" "components/mural/mural.app.mjs"
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for the class definition to understand the context
rg "class.*Mural" "components/mural/mural.app.mjs"
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check if the file exists
fd "mural.app.mjs$" "components/mural"
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# If file exists, let's see its content
cat components/mural/mural.app.mjs
Length of output: 5327
components/mural/actions/create-sticky/create-sticky.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM!
The import statement correctly references the mural app module.
3-8: Verify semantic versioning strategy
The metadata is well-structured and includes helpful documentation links. Since this is a new component (v0.0.1), ensure you have a versioning strategy in place for future updates.
26-34: Verify shape options against API documentation
The shape options seem limited to 'circle' and 'rectangle'. Please verify if these are all the supported shapes in the Mural API documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Shape options are correctly implemented for Mural API
The current implementation with 'circle' and 'rectangle' options appears to be correct for the Mural API. This is evidenced by:
- The shape options are distinct from Miro's implementation (found in
components/miro_custom_app/common/constants.mjs), which has additional shapes like 'square', 'round_rectangle', and 'triangle'. - The component links to the official Mural API documentation in its description:
[See the documentation](https://developers.mural.co/public/reference/createstickynote) - The implementation is consistent with other Mural-specific sticky note components in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other shape definitions in the codebase for consistency
# Search for shape definitions in mural components
rg -g '*.m?js' "shape.*circle.*rectangle" components/mural/
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for shape-related configurations in mural components
rg -g '*.m?js' -i "shape.*options.*" components/mural/ -A 5
# Also search for any sticky note related configurations
rg -g '*.m?js' -i "sticky.*shape" components/mural/ -A 5
# Search for any shape type definitions
rg -g '*.m?js' -i "type.*shape" components/mural/ -A 5
Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Mural API documentation if it's included in the repository
fd -e md -e mdx "api|docs|documentation" --exec grep -l -i "sticky.*shape|widget.*shape" {}
# Look for any shape-related constants or enums
rg -g '*.{js,mjs,ts}' "(?i)(const|enum).*shape.*=.*[\{|\[]" -A 5
# Check for any widget or sticky related files that might contain shape information
fd "sticky|widget" -e js -e mjs -e ts --exec cat {}
Length of output: 8175
components/mural/mural.app.mjs (1)
154-157: Review the usage of $ in _makeRequest method
The destructuring of $ = this from opts may not be necessary if $ is not being passed explicitly. Since $ typically refers to the step context in Pipedream components, and you're defaulting it to this, consider if this is required.
Please check if overriding $ is intended. If not, you can simplify the destructuring:
- const {
- $ = this,
- path,
- ...otherOpts
- } = opts;
+ const {
+ path,
+ ...otherOpts
+ } = opts;
+ const $ = this;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/mural/actions/create-mural/create-mural.mjs (1)
55-76: Enhance options documentation for theme props.The theme options would benefit from descriptions explaining what each option represents.
timerSoundTheme: { type: "string", label: "Timer Sound Theme", description: "The timer sound theme for the mural", options: [ - "airplane", - "cello", - "cuckoo", + { + label: "Airplane", + value: "airplane", + description: "Airplane-themed timer sounds" + }, + { + label: "Cello", + value: "cello", + description: "Cello-themed timer sounds" + }, + { + label: "Cuckoo", + value: "cuckoo", + description: "Cuckoo clock-themed timer sounds" + } ], optional: true, }, visitorAvatarTheme: { type: "string", label: "Visitor Avatar Theme", description: "The visitor avatar theme for the mural", options: [ - "animals", - "music", - "travel", + { + label: "Animals", + value: "animals", + description: "Animal-themed visitor avatars" + }, + { + label: "Music", + value: "music", + description: "Music-themed visitor avatars" + }, + { + label: "Travel", + value: "travel", + description: "Travel-themed visitor avatars" + } ], optional: true, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/mural/actions/create-mural/create-mural.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/mural/actions/create-mural/create-mural.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Action metadata is well-structured.
The import statement and action metadata are properly defined with clear documentation links.
* init * new components * pnpm-lock.yaml * fix description
Resolves #14558
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Documentation