[Components] apiary #13264 #14777
[Components] apiary #13264 #14777
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and enhancements to the Apiary application. It includes the creation of actions for managing API projects, fetching blueprints, and publishing blueprints, each encapsulated in their respective modules. Additionally, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs (1)
42-42: Provide a clearer description for the 'code' propertyThe description "
FORMAT: 1" is vague and might not help users understand the expected value.Consider elaborating on the expected format and purpose of the
codeproperty.Example:
- description: "`FORMAT: 1`", + description: "The API blueprint code in format version 1.",components/apiary/actions/fetch-blueprint/fetch-blueprint.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider version management strategy.The basic structure and metadata are well-defined. Since this is a new component (v0.0.1), consider documenting the versioning strategy for future updates, especially regarding breaking changes.
components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs (1)
19-28: Consider adding error handling.The run method could benefit from proper error handling to provide better feedback when the API call fails.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.publishBlueprint({ $, apiSubdomain: this.apiSubdomain, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully published the blueprint with the subdomain '${this.apiSubdomain}'`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to publish blueprint: ${error.message}`); + } },components/apiary/actions/create-api-project/create-api-project.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The metadata structure is well-defined and follows the component conventions. The documentation link is properly included.
Consider adding more context in the description about what an API project represents in Apiary and its typical use cases.
1-52: Consider API rate limits and input validation.As this component interacts with external APIs, consider:
- Implementing rate limiting to prevent quota exhaustion
- Adding input validation for the code prop to ensure valid API blueprint format
- Adding retry logic for transient API failures
Would you like assistance in implementing these architectural improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/apiary/actions/create-api-project/create-api-project.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/actions/fetch-blueprint/fetch-blueprint.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/common/contants.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/apiary/common/contants.mjs
- components/apiary/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/apiary/actions/fetch-blueprint/fetch-blueprint.mjs (1)
9-17: Verify apiSubdomain prop definition in app file.
The props structure looks correct, but let's ensure the "apiSubdomain" prop definition exists in the app file.
✅ Verification successful
apiSubdomain prop definition is correctly implemented
The apiSubdomain prop is properly defined in the app file (components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs) with:
- Correct type and label
- Proper description
- An async options() method that fetches available subdomains from the API
- Used consistently in the app's methods
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of apiSubdomain prop definition in the app file
# Search for apiSubdomain definition in the app file
rg -A 5 "apiSubdomain.*:.*{" "components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs"
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler search pattern for apiSubdomain prop definition
rg "apiSubdomain" "components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs"
# Also let's check the content of the app file to understand its structure
cat "components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs"
Length of output: 2590
components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM! Well-structured module definition with documentation.
The module follows best practices with clear naming, versioning, and includes helpful documentation link.
9-17: Verify the apiSubdomain propDefinition in app module.
The props structure is correct, but let's verify the referenced propDefinition exists.
✅ Verification successful
The apiSubdomain propDefinition exists and is correctly implemented
The verification confirms that the apiSubdomain propDefinition exists in components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs and is properly implemented with:
- Correct type and label
- Async options function that fetches available subdomains from the API
- Proper description and value mapping
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the apiSubdomain propDefinition exists in the app module
# Search for apiSubdomain propDefinition in the app module
ast-grep --pattern 'apiSubdomain: {
$$$
}' components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
cat components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs
# As a backup, let's also search for any file containing 'apiary.app' in case the path is different
fd apiary.app
Length of output: 2352
components/apiary/actions/create-api-project/create-api-project.mjs (1)
9-35: Verify prop definitions and required fields.
The props structure is correct, but let's verify:
- That all prop definitions exist in the app.mjs file
- Whether all required fields for API project creation are covered
✅ Verification successful
Props are correctly defined and match the app's requirements
All four props (type, public, desiredName, and code) are properly defined in the app.mjs file with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The props structure in the action component correctly references these definitions. The properties align with Apiary's API project creation requirements:
type: String with predefined API types from constantspublic: Boolean flag for API visibilitydesiredName: String for API project namecode: String for API specification with FORMAT: 1
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify prop definitions and API documentation
# Check if all props are defined in app.mjs
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
type: {
$$$
}
$$$
public: {
$$$
}
$$$
desiredName: {
$$$
}
$$$
code: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs
# Check API documentation for required fields
curl -s https://apiary.docs.apiary.io/reference/blueprint/create-api-project | grep -A 5 "Required Parameters"
Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the prop definitions
# First, let's check if the app.mjs file exists and see its content
fd "apiary.app.mjs" --exec cat {}
# As a backup, let's also search for prop definitions using ripgrep
rg "propDefinitions.*type|propDefinitions.*public|propDefinitions.*desiredName|propDefinitions.*code" -A 5 components/apiary/
Length of output: 2428
components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs (4)
39-43: Improve documentation for the Code propertyThe description "
FORMAT: 1" is cryptic. Consider adding more context about what this format represents and provide an example.code: { type: "string", label: "Code", - description: "`FORMAT: 1`", + description: "API Blueprint code in FORMAT: 1A syntax. Example: `FORMAT: 1A\n# My API\n## Endpoints`", },
46-64: Consider adding timeout and rate limiting handlingThe request wrapper could benefit from additional error handling and configuration:
_baseUrl() { - return "https://api.apiary.io"; + return process.env.APIARY_API_URL || "https://api.apiary.io"; }, async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { const { $ = this, path, headers, + timeout = 10000, ...otherOpts } = opts; return axios($, { ...otherOpts, url: this._baseUrl() + path, + timeout, headers: { ...headers, Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.token}`, + 'X-Client-ID': 'pipedream', }, + validateStatus: (status) => status < 500, }); },
65-71: Add input validation for createApiProjectConsider validating required parameters before making the API call:
async createApiProject(args = {}) { + const { data } = args; + if (!data?.name || !data?.type) { + throw new Error("Missing required parameters: name and type are required"); + } return this._makeRequest({ path: "/blueprint/create", method: "post", ...args, }); },
88-92: Add pagination support for listApisConsider adding pagination parameters and response handling:
-async listApis(args = {}) { +async listApis({ page = 1, limit = 100, ...args } = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/me/apis", + params: { + page, + limit, + ...args.params, + }, ...args, }); },components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs (2)
3-17: Consider adding optional configuration propsThe action could benefit from additional optional props for customization:
export default { key: "apiary-publish-blueprint", name: "Publish Blueprint", description: "Publish an API Blueprint for a particular API. [See the documentation](https://apiary.docs.apiary.io/#reference/blueprint/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint)", version: "0.0.1", type: "action", props: { app, apiSubdomain: { propDefinition: [ app, "apiSubdomain", ], }, + validateOnly: { + type: "boolean", + label: "Validate Only", + description: "If true, validates the blueprint without publishing", + optional: true, + default: false, + }, },
27-28: Remove extra blank lineThere's an extra blank line that should be removed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 27-28: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/apiary.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/apiary/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/apiary/common/constants.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
components/apiary/actions/publish-blueprint/publish-blueprint.mjs
[error] 27-28: More than 1 blank line not allowed.
(no-multiple-empty-lines)
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Chores
@pipedream/apiarypackage, detailing its metadata and dependencies.