Skip to content

fix(OMN-15521): add missing 2613 contract evidence binding - #5876

Merged
jonahgabriel merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/omn-15521-2613-contract-repair
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

jonahgabriel merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/omn-15521-2613-contract-repair

Conversation

@jonahgabriel

@jonahgabriel jonahgabriel commented Aug 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds the missing OMN-15521 dod_evidence entry for omnibase_infra#2613 and an append-only numeric supersession for the merged #5872 receipt.

Product-PR: OmniNode-ai/omnibase_infra#2613
Product-Head: da95994ccaa6d419acbab46d4a07f6c6dbb123ff

Local verification:

  • product source readback returned 1
  • check_receipt_hardening PASS
  • validator_occ_append_only PASS
  • pre-commit changed files PASS
  • local validator_occ_merge_eligibility for omnibase_infra#2613 PASS

Evidence-Ticket: OMN-15521
Evidence-Source: OCC#5877

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added verified delivery evidence connecting the tracked work item to its corresponding implementation change.
    • Documented the commands and checks used to confirm the change status and affected files.
  • Chores

    • Added a replacement record with validation results, execution details, and integrity information to maintain an auditable history.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 54 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 072d3024-712c-476c-b2b1-8efabd5a1e7f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5bf4254 and 129cc96.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/OMN-15521.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15521/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2613/command.supersede.5875.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15521/occ-self-bind-pr-5876/command.yaml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR adds verified DoD evidence for OMN-15521 and OmniNode-ai/omnibase_infra PR #2613. It also adds a supersede receipt with verification metadata, hashes, and repair branch information.

Changes

DoD evidence binding

Layer / File(s) Summary
Contract evidence entry
contracts/OMN-15521.yaml
Adds a manually sourced evidence entry with commands that verify PR #2613 state and changed files.
Supersede verification receipt
drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15521/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2613/command.supersede.5875.yaml
Records the superseded contract path, replacement check, PASS status, execution metadata, probe output, integrity hashes, and repair branch.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the added OMN-15521 evidence binding for omnibase_infra PR #2613.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/omn-15521-2613-contract-repair

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the codex/omn-15521-2613-contract-repair branch from 5bf4254 to 129cc96 Compare August 1, 2026 20:06

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
`@drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15521/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2613/command.supersede.5875.yaml`:
- Line 19: Rename the receipt file represented by command.supersede.5875.yaml to
the required timestamp-based layout, using the recorded run_timestamp value
2026-08-01T20:52:00+00:00 as the filename under its existing ticket and item ID
directories. Preserve the receipt content and omnibase_core.ModelDodReceipt
shape.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 41b4b209-62e5-42c0-828d-db3a96db9bbe

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c6670a and 5bf4254.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • contracts/OMN-15521.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15521/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2613/command.supersede.5875.yaml

check_value: |-
gh pr view 2613 --repo OmniNode-ai/omnibase_infra --json number,state --jq '.number == 2613 and .state == "OPEN"' | grep -qx true && gh api repos/OmniNode-ai/omnibase_infra/contents/tests/scripts/test_deploy_gateway.py?ref=da95994ccaa6d419acbab46d4a07f6c6dbb123ff --jq '.content' | base64 -d | grep -c 'def test_build_command_stamps_sibling_ref_build_args'
status: PASS
run_timestamp: "2026-08-01T20:52:00+00:00"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Use a timestamp-based receipt filename.

Rename this receipt so its filename uses the recorded run_timestamp, not command.supersede.5875.yaml. The current path does not match the required receipt layout.

As per coding guidelines, receipts under drift/dod_receipts/**/*.yaml must use drift/dod_receipts/<TICKET>/<ITEM_ID>/<run_timestamp>.yaml and the omnibase_core.ModelDodReceipt shape.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15521/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2613/command.supersede.5875.yaml`
at line 19, Rename the receipt file represented by command.supersede.5875.yaml
to the required timestamp-based layout, using the recorded run_timestamp value
2026-08-01T20:52:00+00:00 as the filename under its existing ticket and item ID
directories. Preserve the receipt content and omnibase_core.ModelDodReceipt
shape.

Source: Coding guidelines

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant