Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
github's default recommendation, I don't know why |
|
|
I think we can ignore Kitty's failure. It probably just needs an update to fix the test. |
adamcstephens
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In general there's no need to use github's review request. The CI jobs will properly request review from the maintainers of a package.
|
@rvolosatovs @Luflosi @kashw2 @leiserfg fyi this latest fish looks like it's going to break kitty tests. I did a quick look upstream but didn't see a fix yet. |
c00a6c1 to
4f99d4b
Compare
alois31
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This breaks fish_patched-completion-generator (from nixos/modules/programs/fish.nix) with the following error due to a file being gone:
Running phase: unpackPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "unpackPhase" }
unpacking source archive /nix/store/yijnd98rbb77vx0ll37ajwfaalkvbrkk-fish-4.2.0/share/fish/tools/create_manpage_completions.py
unpacking source archive /nix/store/yijnd98rbb77vx0ll37ajwfaalkvbrkk-fish-4.2.0/share/fish/tools/deroff.py
cp: cannot stat '/nix/store/yijnd98rbb77vx0ll37ajwfaalkvbrkk-fish-4.2.0/share/fish/tools/deroff.py': No such file or directory
do not know how to unpack source archive /nix/store/yijnd98rbb77vx0ll37ajwfaalkvbrkk-fish-4.2.0/share/fish/tools/deroff.py
Some adjustment will be needed to not render the module essentially unusable.
The create_manpage_completions.py already includes deroff.py, so deroff.py is no longer needed separately. |
7305bbb to
c74faa8
Compare
|
The tests are failing. If you run |
What and where have you seen? |
see logs in: |
Kovid fixed it upstream, I think the patch can be added in this PR. |
Perhaps we need to modify the test code; should |
|
@lonerOrz the patch is merged upstream already,IMHO it's better to use fetchpatch pointing to the commit instead of vendoring the patch file. |
671498e to
a92b1a2
Compare
|
Not sure if it's just me, but some of the fish tests might be a bit flaky (no pun intended) on master branch I didn't capture a log but somehow after a few EDIT: Seems it was fixed in #461243 or #461265 and I must have updated my flake input around the time it was merged |
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.