pattypan: unbreak

[mdaniels5757]

This was broken by #443954.

Hydra failure: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/308417379

Things done

• Built on platform:
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS tests in nixos/tests.
  • Package tests at passthru.tests.
  • Tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test for functions and "core" functionality.
• Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
• Nixpkgs Release Notes
  • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
• NixOS Release Notes
  • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
  • Module update: when the change is significant.
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[mdaniels5757]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 449257
Commit: 65daf17219a9467b758c56a7c8516ea22935ba33 (subsequent changes)
Merge: ef3285150abaffdd43e438e2fa5f2ee9d26eb90e

Logs: https://github.com/mdaniels5757/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/18294528749

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• pattypan

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• pattypan

---

x86_64-darwin (sandbox = true)

✅ 1 package built:

• pattypan

---

aarch64-darwin (sandbox = true)

✅ 1 package built:

• pattypan

[fee1-dead]

woah, didn't know people actually use this :o (im User:Dbeef btw)

will review once i get nixpkgs cloned

[mdaniels5757]

Oddly enough, I just happened to notice it when trying to backport #443954. I don't bulk upload, so I don't use this myself.

Also: hi! Small world :).

[fee1-dead]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 449257
Commit: 65daf17219a9467b758c56a7c8516ea22935ba33

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 2 packages built:

• nixpkgs-manual
• pattypan

[tomodachi94]

Oops! Good catch, that's embarassing. Thank you for investigating and backporting things!

(PS. if you're backporting #443954, please see #447873.)

[mdaniels5757]

Thanks for the heads up. Tbh, especially given that there was another breakage, I don't see the need to backport it.