SDL2{,_classic}_mixer_2_0: drop

[marcin-serwin]

No longer needed after #402066

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[pbsds]

(in answer to #405245 (comment))

I agree wait for branch-off may not apply, since I don't think dropping a temporary pinned package version count as a breaking change.

I'll remove the label and request review from other some committers who are free to merge if they think my impression is in alignment with nixpkgs.

[pbsds]

we have go-ahead from release manager https://matrix.to/#/!aGqRytqbCECitOFhbt:nixos.org/$iaGbD7s9QFxLOa80Pb4d643uRQ2JTos7tfHePZAQ2tI?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=tchncs.de

[niklaskorz]

Looks like this broke evaluation

[LordGrimmauld]

Uh oh - seems #401206 (comment) was never cleaned up, i wonder how i missed that...

[pbsds]

CI should have caught it, but it seems it was evaluated with allowaliases?

[marcin-serwin]

Uh oh - seems #401206 (comment) was never cleaned up, i wonder how i missed that...

It was cleaned up but was mistakenly reintroduced by #405640

[LordGrimmauld]

okay what the hell... Why was that reintroduced? Was darwin actually broken?

[pbsds]

Seems to be my fault, I should have caught the _2_0 addition in there

[LordGrimmauld]

Eh, its fine, lets not play the blame game here - this happened, now we need to clean up the mess. Do we have anyone with a darwin builder on the new sdl team?

[pbsds]

Retrospectives are not IMO to assign blame, but to prevent future cases like it :)

• SDL2{,_classic}_mixer_2_0: drop #407073

Do we have anyone with a darwin builder on the new sdl team?

Consider https://nix-community.org/community-builders/, it is what i use. You two getting access should IMO not be an issue