zulip: electron_32 -> electron

[FriedrichAltheide]

• zulip switch from electron_32 to electron because electron_32 is EOL

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[SuperSandro2000]

Did you test the applications by opening it and using it a bit?

[andersk]

Upgrading Electron to a newer major version is known not to work in general: #279545 (comment)

So even if we carefully test a specific upgrade and it happens to work, we need to pin to a known-working version of electron_NN rather than electron.

[nbdd0121]

I believe the issue here is that electron 32 is EOL and now it's failing to evaluate without permittedInsecurePackages. @andersk perhaps you want to upgrade upstream and cut a new release?

[devurandom]

Upstream PR to update Electron: zulip/zulip-desktop#1413

[FriedrichAltheide]

Closed in favour of #390714