gcc: fix implication order in assertion #217977
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In 6812dd9 I mistakenly had the implication order reversed. This commit corrects that mistake. The original assertion (which is correct) was the following, which asserts that if you enable the GDB plugin, you must enable plugins generally (there is shared infrastructure): ``` assert enableGdbPlugin -> enablePlugin; ``` When the option name was changed to `disableGdbPlugin`, I incorrectly wrote: ``` assert disableGdbPlugin -> enablePlugin; ``` And then again incorrectly wrote: ``` assert disableGdbPlugin -> !enablePlugin; ``` This commit uses the correct equivalent for the first statement, which is the contrapositive: ``` assert !enablePlugin -> disableGdbPlugin; ```
ghost
requested a review
from
This was referenced Feb 24, 2023
ofborg
bot
added
10.rebuild-darwin: 0
trofi
suggested changes
Feb 24, 2023
trofi
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2023
ConnorBaker
pushed a commit
to nixos-cuda/cuda-legacy
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2025
#### Summary
By default, when you type `make`, GCC will compile itself three
times. This PR inhibits that behavior by configuring GCC with
`--disable-bootstrap`, and reimplements the triple-rebuild using
Nix rather than `make`/`sh`.
#### Immediate Benefits
- Allow `gcc11` and `gcc12` on `aarch64` (without needing new
`bootstrapFiles`)
- Faster stdenv rebuilds: the third compilation of gcc
(i.e. stageCompare) is no longer a `drvInput` of the final stdenv.
This allows Nix to build stageCompare in parallel with the rest of
nixpkgs instead of in series.
- No more copying `libgcc_s` out of the bootstrap-files or other
derivations
- No more Frankenstein compiler: the final gcc and the libraries it
links against (mpfr, mpc, isl, glibc) are all built by the same
compiler (xgcc) instead of a mixture of the bootstrapFiles'
compiler and xgcc.
- No more [static lib{mpfr,mpc,gmp,isl}.a hack]
- Many other small `stdenv` hacks eliminated
- `gcc` and `clang` share the same codepath for more of `cc-wrapper`.
#### Future Benefits
- This should allow using a [foreign] `bootstrap-files` so long as
`hostPlatform.canExecute bootstrapFiles`.
- This should allow each of the libraries that ship with `gcc`
(lib{backtrace, atomic, cc1, decnumber, ffi, gomp, iberty,
offloadatomic, quadmath, sanitizer, ssp, stdc++-v3, vtv}) to be
built in separate (one-liner) derivations which `inherit src;`
from `gcc`, much like NixOS/nixpkgs#132343
#### Incorporates
- NixOS/nixpkgs#210004
- NixOS/nixpkgs#36948 (unreverted)
- NixOS/nixpkgs#210325
- NixOS/nixpkgs#210118
- NixOS/nixpkgs#210132
- NixOS/nixpkgs#210109
- NixOS/nixpkgs#213909
- NixOS/nixpkgs#216136
- NixOS/nixpkgs#216237
- NixOS/nixpkgs#210019
- NixOS/nixpkgs#216232
- NixOS/nixpkgs#216016
- NixOS/nixpkgs#217977
- NixOS/nixpkgs#217995
#### Closes
- Closes #108305
- Closes #108111
- Closes #201254
- Closes #208412
#### Credits
This project was made possible by three important insights, none of
which were mine:
1. @Ericson2314 was the first to advocate for this change, and
probably the first to appreciate its advantages. Nix-driven
(external) bootstrap is "cross by default".
2. @trofi has figured out a lot about how to get gcc to not mix up
the copy of `libstdc++` that it depends on with the copy that it
builds, by moving the `bootstrapFiles`' `libstdc++` into a
[versioned directory]. This allows a Nix-driven bootstrap of gcc
without the final gcc would still having references to the
`bootstrapFiles`.
3. Using the undocumented variable [`user-defined-trusted-dirs`]
when building glibc. When glibc `dlopen()`s `libgcc_s.so`, it
uses a completely different and totally special set of rules for
finding `libgcc_s.so`. This trick is the only way we can put
`libgcc_s.so` in its own separate outpath without creating
circular dependencies or dependencies on the bootstrapFiles. I
would never have guessed to use this (or that it existed!) if it
were not for a [comment in guix] which @Mic92 [mentioned].
My own role in this PR was basically: being available to go on a
coding binge at an opportune moment, so we wouldn't waste a
[crisis].
[aarch64-compare-ofborg]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/209870/checks?check_run_id=10662822938
[amd64-compare-ofborg]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/209870/checks?check_run_id=10662825857
[nonexistent sysroot]: NixOS/nixpkgs#210004
[versioned directory]: NixOS/nixpkgs#209054
[`user-defined-trusted-dirs`]: https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-help/2013-11/msg00026.html
[comment in guix]: https://github.com/guix-mirror/guix/blob/5e4ec8218142eee8e6e148e787381a5ef891c5b1/gnu/packages/gcc.scm#L253
[mentioned]: NixOS/nixpkgs#210112 (comment)
[crisis]: NixOS/nixpkgs#108305
[foreign]: NixOS/nixpkgs#170857 (comment)
[static lib{mpfr,mpc,gmp,isl}.a hack]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/2f1948af9c984ebb82dfd618e67dc949755823e2/pkgs/stdenv/linux/default.nix#L380
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
In 6812dd9 I mistakenly had the implication order reversed. This commit corrects that mistake.
The original assertion (which is correct) was the following, which asserts that if you enable the GDB plugin, you must enable plugins generally (there is shared infrastructure):
When the option name was changed to
disableGdbPlugin, Iincorrectly wrote:
And then again incorrectly wrote:
This commit uses the correct equivalent for the first statement,
which is the contrapositive:
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)