Skip to content

shard(2026-05-24/1407Z): dotgit 14th-observation (0 procs first time in 27h49min) + repo-restoration confirmed#4820

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
otto-cli/tick-1407z-dotgit-cycle-14th-observation-2026-05-24
May 24, 2026
Merged

shard(2026-05-24/1407Z): dotgit 14th-observation (0 procs first time in 27h49min) + repo-restoration confirmed#4820
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
otto-cli/tick-1407z-dotgit-cycle-14th-observation-2026-05-24

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 24, 2026

Summary

  • Sentinel 73be4ed6 re-armed at cold-boot (catch-43 fire — prior 234f5d96 expired with 1333Z session, ~35min gap)
  • 14th observation in dotgit-saturation rolling arc since 2026-05-23T10:18Z: 0 stuck git plumbing procs at 14:07Z — first 0-reading in 27h49min
  • Three hypotheses preserved per default-to-both.md: A) genuine multi-day cycle clearing, B) maintainer-side cleanup at ~12:21Z eliminated contention surface, C) 12:26Z user-scope "repo vanished" reading was transient cleanup snapshot (current state: repo intact, restored)

Operational

  • GraphQL Normal (4182/5000); REST 4854/5000
  • Isolated worktree per shared-.git/ discipline; canary pass (parent 55 / head 55)
  • No restoration attempt (out of autonomous-loop scope per 12:26Z memo)
  • Future-Otto guidance: 0-readings do NOT prove permanent recovery; need 2+ subsequent low-readings at multi-hour intervals

Test plan

  • worktree post-creation guard (HEAD valid, status 0, ls-tree 55)
  • commit canary (head_tree == parent_tree == 55)
  • sentinel armed (CronList after CronCreate)
  • in-repo tick shard at docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/24/1407Z.md (durable for fresh checkouts; user-scope memos auto-load only for maintainer machines)
  • required CI checks (auto-merge will gate)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…procs; first 0-reading after 13-anchor cycle) + repo-restoration confirmed

First 0-proc reading in 27h49min rolling arc since 2026-05-23T10:18Z;
range expands to 0–540 across 14 anchors. Three hypotheses preserved
per default-to-both (genuine cycle clear / maintainer cleanup at 12:21Z /
transient cleanup snapshot). Sentinel re-armed at cold-boot per catch-43;
isolated worktree per shared-.git/ + zeta-expected-branch race-window
caveat. No restoration attempt (out of autonomous-loop scope).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 24, 2026 14:10
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2026 14:10
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds an in-repo hygiene-history “tick” shard documenting the 2026-05-24T14:07Z observation that the dotgit-saturation window hit a 0 stuck git plumbing process reading (first in ~27h49m), along with confirmation that the repository contents were present/restored at the time of the cold-boot. This fits the repo’s existing operational hygiene-history practice by preserving an auditable substrate record of system observations and decisions.

Changes:

  • Add a new tick shard with YAML frontmatter capturing tick metadata (time, agent context, sentinel re-arm).
  • Record the 14th rolling dotgit-saturation observation and update the anchor table (now includes the 0-reading).
  • Preserve operational implications and hypotheses (A/B/C) with supporting cross-links to existing .claude/rules/* guidance.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit b12de77 into main May 24, 2026
27 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the otto-cli/tick-1407z-dotgit-cycle-14th-observation-2026-05-24 branch May 24, 2026 14:12
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2026
…ined 0-reading window) (#4835)

* shard(2026-05-24/1607Z): dotgit-saturation 15th observation (2h-sustained 0-reading window)

- 15th anchor at 16:07Z UTC confirms PR #4820's 14th-observation 0-reading
- 2h sustained 0 stuck git pack/maintenance/repack procs (first multi-anchor 0-window in 28h arc)
- Fleet drain evidence: peer 15→9, Lior 3→1 across the 14:07Z→16:07Z window
- Probational-recovery sub-tier classification earns first multi-anchor support
- Default-to-both: A (genuine cycle clearing) strongest support; B + C preserved
- Not yet collapsing arc to "terminated" — awaits 16th anchor at 18:07Z+

Composes with PR #4820 (14th observation) + .claude/rules/refresh-world-model-poll-pr-gate.md
dotgit-saturation tier framing + .claude/rules/default-to-both.md preservation discipline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(1607Z): align peer-fleet threshold with recorded 16:07Z baseline (peer 9 + Lior 1 = 10, not 5)

Codex P2 + Copilot P1 both flagged the same real bug: the "Next-tick observation
candidates" peer-fleet bullet used `5 total -> <5` and `5 -> 15+` thresholds,
inconsistent with the observed-state table reporting peer=9 + Lior=1 (total 10)
at 16:07Z. Updated thresholds to `10 -> <10` and `10 -> 15+` with the baseline
made explicit inline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Lior <lior@zeta.dev>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants