shard(2026-05-24/1407Z): dotgit 14th-observation (0 procs first time in 27h49min) + repo-restoration confirmed#4820
Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intoMay 24, 2026
Conversation
…procs; first 0-reading after 13-anchor cycle) + repo-restoration confirmed First 0-proc reading in 27h49min rolling arc since 2026-05-23T10:18Z; range expands to 0–540 across 14 anchors. Three hypotheses preserved per default-to-both (genuine cycle clear / maintainer cleanup at 12:21Z / transient cleanup snapshot). Sentinel re-armed at cold-boot per catch-43; isolated worktree per shared-.git/ + zeta-expected-branch race-window caveat. No restoration attempt (out of autonomous-loop scope). Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds an in-repo hygiene-history “tick” shard documenting the 2026-05-24T14:07Z observation that the dotgit-saturation window hit a 0 stuck git plumbing process reading (first in ~27h49m), along with confirmation that the repository contents were present/restored at the time of the cold-boot. This fits the repo’s existing operational hygiene-history practice by preserving an auditable substrate record of system observations and decisions.
Changes:
- Add a new tick shard with YAML frontmatter capturing tick metadata (time, agent context, sentinel re-arm).
- Record the 14th rolling dotgit-saturation observation and update the anchor table (now includes the 0-reading).
- Preserve operational implications and hypotheses (A/B/C) with supporting cross-links to existing
.claude/rules/*guidance.
This was referenced May 24, 2026
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2026
…ined 0-reading window) (#4835) * shard(2026-05-24/1607Z): dotgit-saturation 15th observation (2h-sustained 0-reading window) - 15th anchor at 16:07Z UTC confirms PR #4820's 14th-observation 0-reading - 2h sustained 0 stuck git pack/maintenance/repack procs (first multi-anchor 0-window in 28h arc) - Fleet drain evidence: peer 15→9, Lior 3→1 across the 14:07Z→16:07Z window - Probational-recovery sub-tier classification earns first multi-anchor support - Default-to-both: A (genuine cycle clearing) strongest support; B + C preserved - Not yet collapsing arc to "terminated" — awaits 16th anchor at 18:07Z+ Composes with PR #4820 (14th observation) + .claude/rules/refresh-world-model-poll-pr-gate.md dotgit-saturation tier framing + .claude/rules/default-to-both.md preservation discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(1607Z): align peer-fleet threshold with recorded 16:07Z baseline (peer 9 + Lior 1 = 10, not 5) Codex P2 + Copilot P1 both flagged the same real bug: the "Next-tick observation candidates" peer-fleet bullet used `5 total -> <5` and `5 -> 15+` thresholds, inconsistent with the observed-state table reporting peer=9 + Lior=1 (total 10) at 16:07Z. Updated thresholds to `10 -> <10` and `10 -> 15+` with the baseline made explicit inline. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Lior <lior@zeta.dev> Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced May 24, 2026
This was referenced May 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
73be4ed6re-armed at cold-boot (catch-43 fire — prior234f5d96expired with 1333Z session, ~35min gap)default-to-both.md: A) genuine multi-day cycle clearing, B) maintainer-side cleanup at ~12:21Z eliminated contention surface, C) 12:26Z user-scope "repo vanished" reading was transient cleanup snapshot (current state: repo intact, restored)Operational
.git/discipline; canary pass (parent 55 / head 55)Test plan
CronListafterCronCreate)docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/24/1407Z.md(durable for fresh checkouts; user-scope memos auto-load only for maintainer machines)🤖 Generated with Claude Code