fix(hygiene): clear 2026-05-18 tick-link drift#4312
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Release claim task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-links in this branch after fixing the shared tick-shard relative-path debt. Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR fixes broken repo-relative links in 2026-05-18 hygiene tick shards by correcting path depth to reach the repository root and avoiding a non-repo-canonical user-scope memory link.
Changes:
- Updates
.claude/rulesanddocs/backlogrelative links from five to six..segments where needed. - Converts one out-of-repo user-scope memory reference from a markdown link to plain code text.
- Keeps the hygiene-history archival content intact while making link-audit enforcement pass for these touched shards.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2012Z.md |
Corrects repo-root-relative rule and backlog links. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2029Z.md |
Removes an invalid markdown link to user-scope memory outside repo history. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2037Z.md |
Corrects stale-armed-PR rule link depth. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2040Z.md |
Corrects backlog and rule link depths. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2051Z.md |
Corrects blocked-green-CI rule link depths. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2057Z.md |
Corrects rule links used in operational guidance. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2100Z.md |
Corrects refresh-world-model rule link depth. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2109Z.md |
Corrects bounded-wait rule link depth. |
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2112Z-otto-cli-secondary.md |
Corrects claim-coordination rule link depth. |
This was referenced May 19, 2026
This was referenced May 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
..segments to six where needed.task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-linksin the same branch history.Why
Adjacent archive/research PRs (#4306, #4308, #4309 and siblings) were all failing
lint (tick-shard relative-paths)on the same shared 2026-05-18 hygiene-history debt, not on their branch payloads.Verification
bun tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.ts --enforce --baseline tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.baseline.jsongit diff --check