Skip to content

fix(hygiene): clear 2026-05-18 tick-link drift#4312

Merged
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claim/task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-links
May 19, 2026
Merged

fix(hygiene): clear 2026-05-18 tick-link drift#4312
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claim/task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-links

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 19, 2026

What changed

  • Fixes 15 repo-relative links in 2026-05-18 tick shards by correcting path depth from five .. segments to six where needed.
  • Converts one user-scope memory path that points outside repo-canonical history from a markdown link into plain code text.
  • Releases the claim task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-links in the same branch history.

Why

Adjacent archive/research PRs (#4306, #4308, #4309 and siblings) were all failing lint (tick-shard relative-paths) on the same shared 2026-05-18 hygiene-history debt, not on their branch payloads.

Verification

  • bun tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.ts --enforce --baseline tools/hygiene/audit-tick-shard-relative-paths.baseline.json
  • git diff --check

AceHack and others added 2 commits May 18, 2026 22:33
Release claim task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-links in this branch after fixing the shared tick-shard relative-path debt.

Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 19, 2026 02:38
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes broken repo-relative links in 2026-05-18 hygiene tick shards by correcting path depth to reach the repository root and avoiding a non-repo-canonical user-scope memory link.

Changes:

  • Updates .claude/rules and docs/backlog relative links from five to six .. segments where needed.
  • Converts one out-of-repo user-scope memory reference from a markdown link to plain code text.
  • Keeps the hygiene-history archival content intact while making link-audit enforcement pass for these touched shards.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2012Z.md Corrects repo-root-relative rule and backlog links.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2029Z.md Removes an invalid markdown link to user-scope memory outside repo history.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2037Z.md Corrects stale-armed-PR rule link depth.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2040Z.md Corrects backlog and rule link depths.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2051Z.md Corrects blocked-green-CI rule link depths.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2057Z.md Corrects rule links used in operational guidance.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2100Z.md Corrects refresh-world-model rule link depth.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2109Z.md Corrects bounded-wait rule link depth.
docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/18/2112Z-otto-cli-secondary.md Corrects claim-coordination rule link depth.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit adcc1c5 into main May 19, 2026
30 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the claim/task-fix-20260518-tick-shard-links branch May 19, 2026 02:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants