Skip to content

chore(tick): 0109Z shard — flagged stale-base destructive-merge hazard on 3 PRs#3081

Merged
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/tick-shard-0109z-2026-05-14
May 14, 2026
Merged

chore(tick): 0109Z shard — flagged stale-base destructive-merge hazard on 3 PRs#3081
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/tick-shard-0109z-2026-05-14

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 14, 2026

Summary

Tick 0109Z caught a substrate-destruction risk hidden by CLEAN CI gate on PRs #3077, #3078, #3079. All three branches forked before recent forward-radar substrate landed via PRs #3074 + #3076. If merged as-is, they would silently delete 285-379 lines of substrate including:

  • docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md (entire file, 98 lines)
  • docs/forward-radar/calibration.md (entire file, 71 lines)
  • docs/backlog/P1/B-0145-... body content
  • docs/EXPERT-REGISTRY.md PM-2 / Mira row
  • docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0051Z.md + 0052Z.md tick shards

Action

Posted hazard-flag comments on #3077, #3078, #3079. Did NOT arm auto-merge, did NOT close anyone else's PRs, did NOT rebase others' branches.

Test plan

  • Markdown renders
  • Tick shard schema correct
  • Docs-only — no code

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…d on 3 PRs

PR #3077, #3078, #3079 all CLEAN gate / 0 threads / no auto-merge armed but
would DELETE 285-379 lines of substrate (forward-radar TEMPLATE.md,
calibration.md, B-0145 row body, 0051Z.md, 0052Z.md, EXPERT-REGISTRY Mira
row) because their branches were forked before #3074 + #3076 merged.

Posted hazard-flag comments on all 3 PRs naming the specific files and
substrate commits at risk. Did NOT arm auto-merge. Did NOT close (PR
author call). Did NOT rebase anyone else's branch.

Pattern observation: pre-PR-open hook to fetch+diff vs main is a
mechanization gap candidate; filed as substrate observation in shard,
not as a backlog row this tick.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 14, 2026 01:10
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 14, 2026 01:10
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a hygiene-history tick shard documenting the 0109Z review of stale-base destructive-merge hazards on PRs #3077, #3078, and #3079.

Changes:

  • Records the hazard analysis, affected substrate files, and posted PR comments.
  • Captures the follow-up status for related PRs and the cron visibility signal.
  • Notes a possible mechanization gap around opening PRs from stale local branches.

Comment thread docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0109Z.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0109Z.md Outdated
…with +

markdownlint treated "+ refresh-before-decide discipline ..." at the start
of line 55 as an unordered list item (MD032). Rephrased to use "and
.claude/rules/refresh-before-decide.md" — same meaning, no lint failure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AceHack AceHack merged commit dbf0374 into main May 14, 2026
21 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the chore/tick-shard-0109z-2026-05-14 branch May 14, 2026 01:24
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
…Rs resolved correctly (#3085)

- Fixed PR #3081 (0109Z shard) MD032 line-wrap '+' violation + "failure-mode mode" typo
- Resolved both #3081 review threads via GraphQL
- Verified hazard-flag system worked end-to-end:
  - #3077 rebased + MERGED (f4d7fca) — substrate intact
  - #3078 rebased + MERGED (3f1d95b) — substrate intact
  - #3079 CLOSED as obsolete per recommendation
  - #3082 rebased + MERGED (ba7a014) — substrate intact (~180K lines saved)
- Noted PR #3083 (legitimate Otto→Leilani xref fix, stacked on closed #3079)

Total substrate preserved via hazard-flagging: ~1,043 lines across 3 merges
plus 1 destructive merge entirely prevented (#3079 closed).

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants