docs: archive PRs 3073, 3070, 3069#3077
Merged
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Archives three merged PRs (#3073, #3070, #3069) into the docs/pr-discussions/ preservation directory. These archive files capture PR metadata, descriptions, reviews, and threaded discussions for the B-0451 duplicate-row-id substrate cleanup sweep.
Changes:
- Adds archive file for PR #3073 (final 3-way B-0409 collision resolution)
- Adds archive file for PR #3070 (B-0449 slice-5 reservation renumber)
- Adds archive file for PR #3069 (B-0410/B-0411 amara series renumber)
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3073-fix-backlog-resolve-b-0409-3-way-collision-completes-b-0451.md | Verbatim archive of PR #3073 metadata, description, and review threads. |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3070-fix-b-0449-renumber-stale-slice-5-follow-up-reservations.md | Verbatim archive of PR #3070 metadata, description, and review threads. |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3069-fix-backlog-resolve-b-0410-b-0411-collisions-renumber-amara.md | Verbatim archive of PR #3069 metadata, description, and reviewer summary. |
These are history-surface preservation files under docs/pr-discussions/ (preserved verbatim per the courier-protocol absorbing rule). No code changes; no functional risk.
Member
Author
|
This PR's branch was forked before recent substrate landed on main. Merging now would delete 6 files / 379 lines of substrate (per
The substrate landed via PRs #3074 (c671f36) and #3076 (8412805). Remediation: rebase this branch on Per Not arming auto-merge from this tick. — otto-cli autonomous-loop tick 0107Z |
This was referenced May 14, 2026
Merged
3 tasks
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…d on 3 PRs (#3081) * chore(tick): 0109Z shard — flagged stale-base destructive-merge hazard on 3 PRs PR #3077, #3078, #3079 all CLEAN gate / 0 threads / no auto-merge armed but would DELETE 285-379 lines of substrate (forward-radar TEMPLATE.md, calibration.md, B-0145 row body, 0051Z.md, 0052Z.md, EXPERT-REGISTRY Mira row) because their branches were forked before #3074 + #3076 merged. Posted hazard-flag comments on all 3 PRs naming the specific files and substrate commits at risk. Did NOT arm auto-merge. Did NOT close (PR author call). Did NOT rebase anyone else's branch. Pattern observation: pre-PR-open hook to fetch+diff vs main is a mechanization gap candidate; filed as substrate observation in shard, not as a backlog row this tick. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(tick/0109Z): avoid MD032 false positive — rephrase line starting with + markdownlint treated "+ refresh-before-decide discipline ..." at the start of line 55 as an unordered list item (MD032). Rephrased to use "and .claude/rules/refresh-before-decide.md" — same meaning, no lint failure. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Merged
3 tasks
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…Rs resolved correctly (#3085) - Fixed PR #3081 (0109Z shard) MD032 line-wrap '+' violation + "failure-mode mode" typo - Resolved both #3081 review threads via GraphQL - Verified hazard-flag system worked end-to-end: - #3077 rebased + MERGED (f4d7fca) — substrate intact - #3078 rebased + MERGED (3f1d95b) — substrate intact - #3079 CLOSED as obsolete per recommendation - #3082 rebased + MERGED (ba7a014) — substrate intact (~180K lines saved) - Noted PR #3083 (legitimate Otto→Leilani xref fix, stacked on closed #3079) Total substrate preserved via hazard-flagging: ~1,043 lines across 3 merges plus 1 destructive merge entirely prevented (#3079 closed). Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…3075 rebase deferred (#3084) * chore(tick): 0120Z shard — MD032 fix on #3080, catastrophic stale-base flag on #3082, #3075 rebase deferred - Fixed PR #3080 (my prior shard) MD032 self-violation in 0104Z.md (line 43-44 wrap put '+' at line-start, parsed as list marker) - Flagged PR #3082 catastrophic stale-base: branch from a3be6f2, would delete 179K lines / 1462 files including substrate-claim-checker - Attempted PR #3075 rebase on main; conflict on 0104Z.md add/add (concurrent shard for same minute); aborted rebase to avoid clobbering parallel-tick activity surfaced during rebase replay - Released stale B-0456 claim Pattern: 4 stale-base hazards today (#3077, #3078, #3079, #3082); #3078 was rebased + merged after hazard-comment, substrate intact on main. Mechanization gap candidate is pre-PR-open hook fetching origin/main + counting commits-behind. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(tick): MD038 code-span + frontmatter pr-scalar findings on 0120Z shard Two reviewer findings: - MD038/no-space-in-code: '`+ `' (backtick-plus-space-backtick) flagged by markdownlint as space inside code span. Trim to '`+`'. - P1 frontmatter: 'pr: 3080,3082,3075' is comma-separated scalar inconsistent with single-PR convention. Reduce to 'pr: 3080' (the primary PR this shard documents). The third thread (||-double-pipe table claim) is a false positive — no '||' occurrences exist in the file (verified by grep). Resolving with a brief dismissal comment. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Preservation discipline for merged PRs.