feat: process nanocontract transactions and nc_addresses#263
Merged
Conversation
…ntract-tx * origin/master: chore: upgrade wallet-lib to v2.5.1 (#222)
andreabadesso
requested changes
Jul 21, 2025
Member
pedroferreira1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's missing the seqnum handling
pedroferreira1
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
andreabadesso
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
This was referenced Nov 17, 2025
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
To maintain complete transaction history for wallets and addresses, we need to adapt our indexing service to handle these new transactions.
Acceptance Criteria
nc_addresshistorync_addresshistory when the tx is voidedChecklist
master, confirm this code is production-ready and can be included in future releases as soon as it gets merged