DSM Full propagation mode for SQL Server by vandonr · Pull Request #5859 · DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet

vandonr · 2024-08-07T13:24:52Z

Summary of changes

Adding support for Full propagation mode for SQL Server when using DSM.
DSM has 3 modes: disabled, service and full.
Service means that we inject info about the service who sent the query
Full means Service + trace ID and span ID.

Reason for change

We used to forbid Full mode for sql server because it uses a cache of query text -> execution plan, and injecting with comments like we did before would break the cache. (injecting service is OK because it doesn't change much, so the cache is still OK)
The solution that was found was to use the context_info to set the trace/span ID. It's independant from the query itself, and sets a "context" for the duration of the session that is visible to DBM when they sample a "slice" of the DB.
The drawback ofc is that it's an extra query (albeit a fast one) that we have to run before every "regular" query. It can be slow mostly if the network is slow. For this reason, we want to cover it with a span to clearly represent the time being spent there, so that clients can identify where the time is spent.

Implementation details

Test coverage

I added this scenario to the integration test, but since the query is parameterized, I don't think I can assert easily on the value that is set.

Other details

This is the dotnet equivalent of DataDog/dd-trace-java#7186

andrewlock · 2024-08-07T13:51:53Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) - mean (75ms)  : 70, 81
     .   : milestone, 75,
    master - mean (69ms)  : 67, 71
     .   : milestone, 69,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5859) - mean (1,096ms)  : 1064, 1128
     .   : milestone, 1096,
    master - mean (1,077ms)  : 1053, 1101
     .   : milestone, 1077,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) - mean (110ms)  : 104, 116
     .   : milestone, 110,
    master - mean (109ms)  : 105, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5859) - mean (786ms)  : 745, 826
     .   : milestone, 786,
    master - mean (758ms)  : 739, 778
     .   : milestone, 758,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) - mean (93ms)  : 88, 97
     .   : milestone, 93,
    master - mean (92ms)  : 90, 95
     .   : milestone, 92,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5859) - mean (709ms)  : 691, 727
     .   : milestone, 709,
    master - mean (710ms)  : 697, 724
     .   : milestone, 710,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) - mean (191ms)  : 188, 194
     .   : milestone, 191,
    master - mean (190ms)  : 187, 192
     .   : milestone, 190,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5859) - mean (1,157ms)  : 1139, 1175
     .   : milestone, 1157,
    master - mean (1,160ms)  : 1137, 1184
     .   : milestone, 1160,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) - mean (275ms)  : 270, 280
     .   : milestone, 275,
    master - mean (274ms)  : 270, 279
     .   : milestone, 274,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5859) - mean (921ms)  : 901, 942
     .   : milestone, 921,
    master - mean (922ms)  : 902, 942
     .   : milestone, 922,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) - mean (264ms)  : 259, 268
     .   : milestone, 264,
    master - mean (264ms)  : 259, 268
     .   : milestone, 264,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5859) - mean (905ms)  : 884, 925
     .   : milestone, 905,
    master - mean (902ms)  : 883, 922
     .   : milestone, 902,

datadog-ddstaging · 2024-08-07T13:55:16Z

Datadog Report

Branch report: vandonr/setcontext
Commit report: d7429c6
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 365540 Passed, 2089 Skipped, 15h 9m 39.67s Total Time

andrewlock · 2024-08-07T18:02:42Z

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #5859 compared to master:

1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.231
1 benchmarks have fewer allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.84μs	44.3ns	319ns	0.0149	0.00747	0	5.43 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10μs	55.7ns	348ns	0.0145	0.00482	0	5.62 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16μs	51.7ns	200ns	1.01	0.288	0.0881	6.06 KB
#5859	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.95μs	44.5ns	292ns	0.0158	0.00789	0	5.43 KB
#5859	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	9.87μs	56.1ns	392ns	0.0248	0.00994	0	5.61 KB
#5859	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	15.9μs	47.7ns	185ns	1.02	0.305	0.0937	6.07 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	499μs	261ns	1.01μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	638μs	270ns	1.05μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	850μs	595ns	2.31μs	0.422	3.3 KB
#5859	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	478μs	279ns	1.04μs	0	2.7 KB
#5859	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	657μs	434ns	1.62μs	0	2.7 KB
#5859	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	831μs	460ns	1.78μs	0.417	3.29 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendRequest`	net6.0	224μs	2.24μs	22.2μs	0.205	18.45 KB
master	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	235μs	1.43μs	14.1μs	0.254	20.61 KB
master	`SendRequest`	net472	0.00254ns	0.00105ns	0.00408ns	0	0 b
#5859	`SendRequest`	net6.0	205μs	1.18μs	9.77μs	0.214	18.45 KB
#5859	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	229μs	1.35μs	13μs	0.237	20.61 KB
#5859	`SendRequest`	net472	0.000238ns	0.000165ns	0.000637ns	0	0 b

Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Fewer allocations 🎉

Fewer allocations 🎉 in #5859

Benchmark	Base Allocated	Diff Allocated	Change	Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑net6.0	41.69 KB	41.47 KB	-221 B	-0.53%

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	584μs	2.42μs	9.05μs	0.571	0	0	41.69 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	686μs	3.82μs	24.2μs	0.342	0	0	41.64 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	877μs	4.1μs	15.9μs	8.19	2.59	0.431	53.32 KB
#5859	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	561μs	2.15μs	7.76μs	0.592	0	0	41.47 KB
#5859	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	696μs	3.82μs	22.6μs	0.34	0	0	41.78 KB
#5859	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	877μs	2.97μs	10.7μs	8.3	2.62	0.437	53.32 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.25μs	1.4ns	5.41ns	0.0143	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.69μs	1.94ns	7.27ns	0.0135	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.01μs	1.21ns	4.53ns	0.156	987 B
#5859	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.22μs	1.24ns	4.64ns	0.0141	1.02 KB
#5859	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.77μs	2.21ns	7.98ns	0.0134	1.02 KB
#5859	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.04μs	1.76ns	6.33ns	0.156	987 B

Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.19μs	0.623ns	2.16ns	0.0137	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.59μs	0.569ns	2.13ns	0.0127	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.41μs	1.37ns	5.31ns	0.158	995 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.16μs	0.644ns	2.49ns	0.0134	952 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.6μs	0.79ns	2.95ns	0.0136	1.02 KB
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.61μs	1.44ns	5.57ns	0.166	1.05 KB
#5859	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.16μs	0.801ns	3ns	0.014	976 B
#5859	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.48μs	0.763ns	2.86ns	0.0134	976 B
#5859	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.45μs	1.81ns	6.99ns	0.157	995 B
#5859	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.21μs	0.323ns	1.21ns	0.0133	952 B
#5859	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.6μs	0.671ns	2.6ns	0.0136	1.02 KB
#5859	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.56μs	1.2ns	4.47ns	0.167	1.05 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.2μs	0.951ns	3.68ns	0.0132	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.59μs	0.906ns	3.51ns	0.0128	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.76μs	0.73ns	2.83ns	0.145	915 B
#5859	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.33μs	0.651ns	2.43ns	0.0134	952 B
#5859	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.65μs	0.682ns	2.64ns	0.0124	952 B
#5859	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.78μs	1.11ns	4.3ns	0.145	915 B

Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.18μs	3ns	10.8ns	0.0313	2.22 KB
master	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.06μs	2.06ns	7.96ns	0.0355	2.76 KB
master	`SendAsync`	net472	7.88μs	2.89ns	10.8ns	0.497	3.15 KB
#5859	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.05μs	2.84ns	11ns	0.0305	2.22 KB
#5859	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.02μs	3.1ns	12ns	0.0376	2.76 KB
#5859	`SendAsync`	net472	7.78μs	1.59ns	5.96ns	0.497	3.15 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.48μs	0.457ns	1.65ns	0.0231	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.2μs	5.09ns	18.4ns	0.0217	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.62μs	1.34ns	5.02ns	0.249	1.57 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.49μs	0.85ns	3.29ns	0.0232	1.64 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.14μs	0.8ns	2.88ns	0.0215	1.64 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.55μs	2.41ns	9.35ns	0.249	1.57 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	116μs	188ns	730ns	0	0	4.28 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	120μs	168ns	649ns	0.06	0	4.28 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	149μs	153ns	594ns	0.668	0.223	4.46 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	114μs	101ns	377ns	0.0573	0	4.28 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	119μs	179ns	693ns	0	0	4.28 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net472	146μs	218ns	843ns	0.661	0.22	4.46 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	3.01μs	2.55ns	9.88ns	0.0315	2.2 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.09μs	1.11ns	4.28ns	0.0287	2.2 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.85μs	1.88ns	7.27ns	0.319	2.02 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.92μs	0.583ns	2.1ns	0.0307	2.2 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.13μs	1.59ns	6.15ns	0.029	2.2 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.88μs	1.25ns	4.84ns	0.32	2.02 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.39μs	0.591ns	2.29ns	0.0159	0	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.7μs	1.25ns	4.82ns	0.0153	0	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	net472	2.16μs	1.48ns	5.74ns	0.183	0.00107	1.16 KB
#5859	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.35μs	0.95ns	3.68ns	0.0157	0	1.14 KB
#5859	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.85μs	1.68ns	6.51ns	0.0157	0	1.14 KB
#5859	`SendReceive`	net472	2.13μs	1.06ns	3.95ns	0.183	0	1.16 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.91μs	0.892ns	3.46ns	0.0219	1.6 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.94μs	2.89ns	11.2ns	0.0216	1.65 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.43μs	0.962ns	3.33ns	0.323	2.04 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.64μs	0.666ns	2.49ns	0.0224	1.6 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.85μs	1.62ns	6.26ns	0.0228	1.65 KB
#5859	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.34μs	1.88ns	7.29ns	0.322	2.04 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	400ns	0.142ns	0.532ns	0.00805	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	588ns	0.562ns	2.18ns	0.00787	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	623ns	1.11ns	4.31ns	0.0916	578 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	497ns	0.419ns	1.62ns	0.00967	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	731ns	1.96ns	7.61ns	0.00952	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net472	884ns	0.993ns	3.84ns	0.104	658 B
#5859	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	397ns	0.372ns	1.44ns	0.00819	576 B
#5859	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	576ns	0.443ns	1.72ns	0.00783	576 B
#5859	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	643ns	0.362ns	1.4ns	0.0918	578 B
#5859	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	479ns	0.459ns	1.78ns	0.00968	696 B
#5859	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	718ns	0.284ns	1.06ns	0.00949	696 B
#5859	`StartFinishScope`	net472	902ns	0.854ns	3.31ns	0.104	658 B

Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5859

Benchmark	base/diff	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0	1.231	748.23	607.92

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	748ns	0.702ns	2.72ns	0.00971	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	1E+03ns	1.28ns	4.97ns	0.00912	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.11μs	1.33ns	5.14ns	0.104	658 B
#5859	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	608ns	0.332ns	1.28ns	0.00976	696 B
#5859	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	903ns	0.798ns	3.09ns	0.00947	696 B
#5859	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.1μs	1.1ns	4.26ns	0.104	658 B

andrewlock · 2024-08-14T16:45:21Z

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) (11.275M)   : 0, 11274726
    master (11.164M)   : 0, 11164446
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.168M)   : 0, 11167899

    section Automatic
    This PR (5859) (7.431M)   : 0, 7431421
    master (7.489M)   : 0, 7489050
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.868M)   : 0, 7868380

    section Trace stats
    master (7.691M)   : 0, 7690564

    section Manual
    master (11.109M)   : 0, 11109337

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5859) (6.815M)   : 0, 6814974
    master (6.834M)   : 0, 6834101

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.373M)   : 0, 10372679

gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) (9.602M)   : 0, 9601583
    master (9.552M)   : 0, 9552016

    section Automatic
    This PR (5859) (6.723M)   : 0, 6722793
    master (6.705M)   : 0, 6704955

    section Trace stats
    master (6.859M)   : 0, 6858624

    section Manual
    master (9.602M)   : 0, 9601727

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5859) (6.086M)   : 0, 6085872
    master (6.103M)   : 0, 6102529

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.021M)   : 0, 9020990

gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5859) (10.160M)   : 0, 10159582
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.014M)   : 0, 10013706

    section Automatic
    This PR (5859) (6.897M)   : 0, 6897364
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.309M)   : 0, 7308591

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5859) (6.428M)   : 0, 6427891

github-actions · 2024-08-21T09:31:24Z

Snapshots difference summary

The following differences have been observed in committed snapshots. It is meant to help the reviewer.
The diff is simplistic, so please check some files anyway while we improve it.

168 occurrences of :

+      _dd.dbm_trace_injected: true
[...]
+      dd.instrumentation.time_ms: 123.456,

168 occurrences of :

+      _dd.dbm_trace_injected: true,
[...]
+    },
+    Metrics: {
+      dd.instrumentation.time_ms: 123.456

Co-authored-by: Lucas Pimentel <lucas.pimentel@datadoghq.com>

vandonr · 2024-09-02T13:46:34Z

I tried locally by running a long command (WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:20') in the integration tests, and looking at the context set by querying the DB at the same time:

Looks fine I think.

lucaspimentel

Left a few small comments. LGTM otherwise.

Co-authored-by: Lucas Pimentel <lucas.pimentel@datadoghq.com>

bouwkast

Looks good to me thanks!

bouwkast · 2024-09-04T16:32:17Z

+
+            // Since sending the query to the DB can be a bit long, we register the time it took for transparency.
+            // Not using _dd because we want the customers to be able to see that tag.
+            span.SetMetric("dd.instrumentation.time_ms", stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds);


Is dd.instrumentation.time_ms just a one-off name or is this something common? never seen it before and search doesn't show any other usages anywhere in the org

hmm yeah it's a one off, I'm actually not aware of any existing instrumentation that would be long enough that we'd want to document how long it takes.

vandonr added 4 commits August 14, 2024 16:35

inject trace context via set context

8c00441

little bit of refactoring

b18a8ac

copy the tags when reusing them

80af8b5

wider system tests

7c1ef10

vandonr force-pushed the vandonr/setcontext branch from 83718e8 to 7c1ef10 Compare August 14, 2024 14:35

generate xml and fix type of variable

f8cb802

vandonr requested a review from nenadnoveljic August 14, 2024 16:05

vandonr changed the title ~~[WIP] DSM Full propagation mode for SQL Server~~ DSM Full propagation mode for SQL Server Aug 14, 2024

vandonr added 2 commits August 20, 2024 13:44

rewrite context bytes generation to return byte array

08ece1e

rewrite again but with proper endianess

87a2142

vandonr force-pushed the vandonr/setcontext branch from 0e5032b to 87a2142 Compare August 20, 2024 17:05

vandonr added 2 commits August 21, 2024 10:17

fix expected tags for integration tests

094dfed

update snapshots

c87e6d2

vandonr mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2024

add condition in DBM MSSQL to check full mode + temp disable DataDog/system-tests#2903

Merged

7 tasks

vandonr marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2024 11:47

vandonr requested review from a team as code owners August 21, 2024 11:47

lucaspimentel reviewed Aug 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagator.cs Outdated

lucaspimentel reviewed Aug 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagator.cs Outdated

lucaspimentel reviewed Aug 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.Tests/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagatorTests.cs Outdated

fix comment in test

b292664

Co-authored-by: Lucas Pimentel <lucas.pimentel@datadoghq.com>

lucaspimentel reviewed Aug 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.Tests/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagatorTests.cs Outdated

lucaspimentel reviewed Aug 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.Tests/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagatorTests.cs Outdated

lucaspimentel reviewed Aug 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.Tests/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagatorTests.cs Outdated

save time spent on integration in span

50aafe2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot reviewed Aug 30, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/DatabaseMonitoring/DatabaseMonitoringPropagator.cs Outdated

vandonr added 2 commits August 30, 2024 13:00

longer variable name

afe8145

undo changes to samples that were not meant to be commited

2eecd39

don't include instrumentation time in the query span

03bef4f

nenadnoveljic reviewed Sep 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests/AdoNet/SystemDataSqlClientTests.cs