π¨ Palette: HTML 리ν¬νΈ λ΄ μ«μ λ°μ΄ν° κ°λ μ± κ°μ (tabular-nums μ μ©) - #199
π¨ Palette: HTML 리ν¬νΈ λ΄ μ«μ λ°μ΄ν° κ°λ
μ± κ°μ (tabular-nums μ μ©)#199seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head71a7bdbf2f171a58c5e1a80db1589de4bb42c674. -
Head SHA:
71a7bdbf2f171a58c5e1a80db1589de4bb42c674 -
Workflow run: 29765309163
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (9 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (9 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage Decision
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (9 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (9 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Note
Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because it didn't start before the timeout. Make sure your repository has a runner available, or add a copilot-code-review.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.
Adds font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; to the generated HTML report CSS so numeric columns align consistently, and documents the reasoning/lesson learned.
Changes:
- Applied
font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;tobodystyles across multiple report-generating scripts and thefast_mlsirmreport CSS. - Added a CHANGELOG entry describing the numeric-alignment improvement.
- Recorded the learning/action in
.Jules/palette.md.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| scripts/build_release_evidence_index.py | Adds tabular number rendering to report CSS for improved numeric alignment. |
| scripts/build_procurement_due_diligence.py | Adds tabular numbers to inline body CSS in generated reports. |
| scripts/build_pr_queue_governance.py | Adds tabular numbers to inline body CSS in generated reports. |
| scripts/build_figma_evidence_sync.py | Adds tabular numbers to inline body CSS in generated reports. |
| scripts/build_commercial_release.py | Adds tabular number rendering to report CSS for improved numeric alignment. |
| scripts/build_buyer_packet.py | Adds tabular number rendering to report CSS for improved numeric alignment. |
| scripts/build_benchmark_report.py | Adds tabular number rendering to report CSS for improved numeric alignment. |
| python/fast_mlsirm/report.py | Adds tabular number rendering to diagnostics report CSS. |
| CHANGELOG.md | Documents the change and affected report generators. |
| .Jules/palette.md | Adds an entry capturing the rationale and future guidance. |
π‘ Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
- `python/fast_mlsirm/report.py`μ `scripts/build_*.py` μ€ν¬λ¦½νΈμμ μμ±λλ HTML 리ν¬νΈμ `body` μ€νμΌμ `font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;` CSS μμ±μ μΆκ°νμ΅λλ€. - μ΄λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ λ°μ΄ν° ν μ΄λΈκ³Ό ν΅κ³ μ°¨νΈμμ μ«μ λλΉκ° λμΌνκ² λ§μΆμ΄μ Έ μκ°μ μ λ ¬(vertical alignment)κ³Ό κ°λ μ±μ΄ ν¬κ² κ°μ λ©λλ€. - λ³Έ κ°μ μ¬νμ κ΄ν κ΅νμ `.Jules/palette.md` νμΌμ κΈ°λ‘νμμ΅λλ€.
8809d76 to
290ed1f
Compare
β¦fresh head for re-review The previous CHANGES_REQUESTED verdict on this head was an infrastructure failure (the central coverage-evidence sandbox could not install numpy β fixed by ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611), not a code judgment. This commit documents the change and produces a fresh head so the scheduler dispatches a new review under the repaired pipeline.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 36 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review detailsβοΈ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: π Files selected for processing (10)
β¨ Finishing Touchesπ§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
Superseded: Palette accessibility/empty-state/tabular-nums/skip-link themes already landed on main (e.g. #283 empty-state ARIA) or this branch is CONFLICTING with no clean rebase path. Closing as superseded. |
|
Closing as superseded: Palette theme already on main or blocked by unresolvable conflicts with current main. Prefer re-open from a fresh branch if still needed. |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded and stopping work on this task. |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded and stopping work on this task. |
π‘ 무μμ κ°μ νλμ?
HTML 리ν¬νΈ λ° λ¬Έμ μμ± μ€ν¬λ¦½νΈμ CSS
bodyμfont-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;μμ±μ μΌκ΄μ μΌλ‘ μΆκ°νμ΅λλ€. λν λ³κ²½ μ¬νμ λ°°κ²½κ³Ό κ΅νμ κΈ°λ‘ν.Jules/palette.mdμ μλ‘μ΄ νλͺ©μ μΆκ°νμ΅λλ€.π― μ μ΄ λ³κ²½μ΄ νμνκ°μ?
λ°μ΄ν°κ° λ§μ μ μ HTML 리ν¬νΈμμλ μ«μλ€μ΄ μμλλ‘ λλν λμ΄λ©λλ€. μΌλ°μ μΈ λΉλ‘ν(proportional) μ체μ μ«μλ₯Ό μ¬μ©νλ©΄, μ«μ κ°μ λλΉκ° λ¬λΌμ Έ ν μ΄λΈμ΄λ λ©νΈλ¦ λ°μ΄ν°λ₯Ό λμΌλ‘ μ€μΊνλ©° λΉκ΅νκΈ° μ΄λ ΅μ΅λλ€.
tabular-numsλ₯Ό μ§μ νλ©΄ κ° μ«μκ° λμΌν λλΉλ₯Ό κ°λλ‘(monospaced numbers) κ°μ νλ―λ‘ μμ§ μ λ ¬μ΄ κ°μ λκ³ λ°μ΄ν°μ κ°λ μ±μ΄ μλ±ν λμμ§λλ€.πΈ λ³κ²½ μ /ν (μ€λͺ )
βΏ μ κ·Όμ± κ°μ
μΈμ§μ μΈ‘λ©΄μμμ μ¬μ©μ±μ λμμ΅λλ€. λΉ½λΉ½ν μ«μ λ°μ΄ν°λ₯Ό λ€λ£¨λ μ¬μ©μ(μ: λ°μ΄ν° λΆμκ°, κ³ κ°)κ° νΌλ‘κ°μ λ λλΌκ³ , κ°μ λΉ λ₯΄κ³ μ ννκ² μΈμ§νκ³ λΉκ΅ν μ μκ² λμ΅λλ€.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 3808207975891868160 started by @seonghobae