🎨 Palette: 데이터 테이블 스캔 향상을 위한 Tabular Numbers 적용

[seonghobae]

💡 What: 정적 HTML 진단 보고서의 body 스타일에 font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; CSS 속성을 추가했습니다.
🎯 Why: 데이터가 많은 테이블과 차트에서 숫자들이 각 폰트 너비에 따라 불규칙하게 표시되는 현상을 방지하고, 숫자가 수직으로 정렬되도록 하여 사용자가 지표를 더 쉽게 스캔하고 비교할 수 있도록 개선합니다.
♿ Accessibility: 타이포그래피 미세 조정(micro-typography improvement)을 통해 데이터 가독성을 향상시켜 인지적 부담을 줄입니다.
📝 참고로, 이 UX 향상과 관련된 배움은 .Jules/palette.md에 기록되었습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 142246736514301365 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 8d32bdfc431e9a646e7073043ab42873b1e2b18a.

• Head SHA: 8d32bdfc431e9a646e7073043ab42873b1e2b18a

• Workflow run: 29685917376

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
  S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
  R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 8d32bdfc431e9a646e7073043ab42873b1e2b18a
• Workflow run: 29685917376
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 8d32bdfc431e9a646e7073043ab42873b1e2b18a.

• Head SHA: 8d32bdfc431e9a646e7073043ab42873b1e2b18a

• Workflow run: 29685917376

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage Decision

• Result: FAIL
• Test evidence: not proven passing
• Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
• Failure count: 1

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Test: test_report.py"]
  S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_report.py"]
  R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

중복 정리: report.py body의 tabular-nums 적용(+테스트)이 #187(동일 CSS + 테이블 th 접근성)과 #199(스크립트 전반)에 포괄됩니다. 해당 PR들을 대표로 남기고 닫습니다.

배경: 2026-07-14 이후 조직 coverage-evidence 인프라 문제로 모든 PR이 REQUEST_CHANGES 상태였습니다(인프라 수정: ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611). 필요 시 재오픈 가능합니다.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[google-labs-jules]

중복 정리: report.py body의 tabular-nums 적용(+테스트)이 #187(동일 CSS + 테이블 th 접근성)과 #199(스크립트 전반)에 포괄됩니다. 해당 PR들을 대표로 남기고 닫습니다.

배경: 2026-07-14 이후 조직 coverage-evidence 인프라 문제로 모든 PR이 REQUEST_CHANGES 상태였습니다(인프라 수정: ContextualWisdomLab/.github#611). 필요 시 재오픈 가능합니다.

---

Generated by Claude Code

이해했습니다. 해당 작업이 다른 PR(#187, #199)에 포함되었으므로 작업을 중단하겠습니다.