Skip to content

Adding newly generated Vnet files#3537

Closed
dnayantara wants to merge 7 commits intoAzure:psSdkJson6from
dnayantara:migrationFlag
Closed

Adding newly generated Vnet files#3537
dnayantara wants to merge 7 commits intoAzure:psSdkJson6from
dnayantara:migrationFlag

Conversation

@dnayantara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dnayantara dnayantara commented Aug 1, 2017

Adding the new regenerated Vnet files. Swagger changes in the pull request - Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#1492

This adds optional parameters so the current tests are successful as they are.

Description


This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

General Guidelines

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

SDK Generation Guidelines

  • If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.
  • The generate.cmd file for the SDK has been updated with the version of AutoRest, as well as the commitid of your swagger spec or link to the swagger spec, used to generate the code.
  • The *.csproj and AssemblyInfo.cs files have been updated with the new version of the SDK.

@msftclas
Copy link
Copy Markdown

msftclas commented Aug 1, 2017

@dnayantara,
Thanks for your contribution as a Microsoft full-time employee or intern. You do not need to sign a CLA.
Thanks,
Microsoft Pull Request Bot

@dnayantara dnayantara requested a review from jaredmoo August 1, 2017 20:23
@dnayantara dnayantara changed the title Migration flag Adding newly generated Vnet files Aug 1, 2017
@dnayantara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Apologies for the multiple commits for numerous merges. I will make sure it does not happen going forward.

@dnayantara dnayantara closed this Aug 1, 2017
@dnayantara dnayantara reopened this Aug 1, 2017
@msftclas
Copy link
Copy Markdown

msftclas commented Aug 1, 2017

@dnayantara,
Thanks for your contribution as a Microsoft full-time employee or intern. You do not need to sign a CLA.
Thanks,
Microsoft Pull Request Bot

@dnayantara dnayantara requested a review from shahabhijeet August 1, 2017 21:07
@dnayantara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I dont understand. Yesterday it said all checks had passed. Why is build failing now? :(

@shahabhijeet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@azuresdkci test this please

/// <param name="state">Virtual network rule state. Possible values
/// include: 'Initializing', 'InProgress', 'Ready', 'Deleting',
/// 'Unknown'</param>
public VirtualNetworkRule(string virtualNetworkSubnetId, string id = default(string), string name = default(string), string type = default(string), bool? ignoreVnetPrivateAccessConfiguration = default(bool?), string state = default(string))
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dnayantara you already have tests for the newly added parameter?
The description of the PR was confusing?
Yes the existing tests will work, but what about testing the new parameter?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@dnayantara dnayantara Aug 2, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code is not deployed in production yet. I will update the tests once that happens. Then new client code has been internally tested successfully.

@dnayantara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The backend code is not yet in production. We cannot publish the nuget package with these changes unless everything is in production.

@dnayantara dnayantara closed this Aug 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants