Conversation
Contributor
Author
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
This was referenced May 13, 2025
benesjan
force-pushed
the
05-13-test_making_l2_to_l1_test_cute
branch
from
4ec59d7 to
42f55b2
Compare
benesjan
force-pushed
the
05-13-refactor_improved_readability_aztecnodeservice.getl2tol1messagemembershipwitness
branch
from
02ea7ed to
246fc78
Compare
benesjan
force-pushed
the
05-13-test_making_l2_to_l1_test_cute
branch
from
42f55b2 to
1d46d08
Compare
benesjan
force-pushed
the
05-13-refactor_improved_readability_aztecnodeservice.getl2tol1messagemembershipwitness
branch
from
3b6a63e to
aec4877
Compare
benesjan
force-pushed
the
05-13-refactor_improved_readability_aztecnodeservice.getl2tol1messagemembershipwitness
branch
from
aec4877 to
21fc7d3
Compare
benesjan
force-pushed
the
05-13-refactor_improved_readability_aztecnodeservice.getl2tol1messagemembershipwitness
branch
from
21fc7d3 to
140fb09
Compare
benesjan
deleted the
05-13-refactor_improved_readability_aztecnodeservice.getl2tol1messagemembershipwitness
branch
charlielye
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
🤖 I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- ## [0.87.2](v0.87.1...v0.87.2) (2025-05-21) ### Miscellaneous * improved readability AztecNodeService.getL2ToL1MessageMembershipWitness ([#14273](#14273)) ([038a518](038a518)) * rename invalid block num to invalid max block num ([#13894](#13894)) ([0db31ce](0db31ce)) * syncNotes --> syncPrivateState ([#14438](#14438)) ([845830a](845830a)), closes [#13113](#13113) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Thunkar
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2025
…rshipWitness (#14273) Felt like the function's readability could be improved so I did that. Used AI a lot for this so some changes might be a bit unnecessary. Complexity of the PR is low though so felt like the bad diff of the function code is fine.
Thunkar
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2025
🤖 I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- ## [0.87.2](v0.87.1...v0.87.2) (2025-05-21) ### Miscellaneous * improved readability AztecNodeService.getL2ToL1MessageMembershipWitness ([#14273](#14273)) ([038a518](038a518)) * rename invalid block num to invalid max block num ([#13894](#13894)) ([0db31ce](0db31ce)) * syncNotes --> syncPrivateState ([#14438](#14438)) ([845830a](845830a)), closes [#13113](#13113) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Felt like the function's readability could be improved so I did that. Used AI a lot for this so some changes might be a bit unnecessary. Complexity of the PR is low though so felt like the bad diff of the function code is fine.