Conversation
…proofing We may need to make a change in the future to require strict IAL2 users to proof with phone. This commit does some work towards making that possible. It makes changes to the authorization controller to prevent a user from being redirected at strict IAL2 unless they have proofed with phone. This change is not totally complete, there are changes that will need to go in place to remove the option during proofing. changelog: Upcoming feature, Proofing, A user will need to proof with a phone before being sent back to the IdP for strict IAL2 proofing
| identity_needs_strict_ial2_verification? | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| def identity_needs_strict_ial2_verification? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I've recently discovered (LG-6217), we're already not very consistent, but: Should we have equivalent logic for SAML as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, however we don't support strict IAL2 in SAML today. I was going to figure out what it all looks like before moving it over
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Interesting, I did not think SAML supported it at all. You may have jumped ahead of me a bit. Fortunately IAL2 strict is disabled in all the places that matter.
| proofing_components['address_check'] == 'lexis_nexis_address' | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| def strict_ial2_proofed? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would like to get includes_liveness_check? and includes_phone_check? out of the public API for the model eventually. First need to chase down all of the existing uses of includes_liveness_check?
…proofing (#6270) We may need to make a change in the future to require strict IAL2 users to proof with phone. This commit does some work towards making that possible. It makes changes to the authorization controller to prevent a user from being redirected at strict IAL2 unless they have proofed with phone. This change is not totally complete, there are changes that will need to go in place to remove the option during proofing. changelog: Upcoming feature, Proofing, A user will need to proof with a phone before being sent back to the IdP for strict IAL2 proofing
…proofing (#6270) We may need to make a change in the future to require strict IAL2 users to proof with phone. This commit does some work towards making that possible. It makes changes to the authorization controller to prevent a user from being redirected at strict IAL2 unless they have proofed with phone. This change is not totally complete, there are changes that will need to go in place to remove the option during proofing. changelog: Upcoming feature, Proofing, A user will need to proof with a phone before being sent back to the IdP for strict IAL2 proofing
We may need to make a change in the future to require strict IAL2 users to proof with phone. This commit does some work towards making that possible. It makes changes to the authorization controller to prevent a user from being redirected at strict IAL2 unless they have proofed with phone. This change is flagged off at the moment.
This change is not totally complete, there are changes that will need to go in place to remove the option during proofing.