Skip to content

Conversation

@tchow-zlai
Copy link
Collaborator

@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai commented May 2, 2025

Summary

Checklist

  • Added Unit Tests
  • Covered by existing CI
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation update

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new test for joining GCP-based training set data, supporting different join configurations.
    • Added a new backfill step for join operations in the data processing pipeline, with environment-specific configuration handling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 2, 2025

Walkthrough

A new Python test file was added to define and configure GCP-based training set joins, specifying sources and join logic for two environments. Additionally, a shell script was updated to introduce a new backfill step, executing a join operation as part of the data processing pipeline. The script selects the appropriate join configuration based on the environment and includes error checking after execution.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
api/python/test/canary/joins/gcp/training_set.py Added test file defining a GCP training set join with sources and join configurations for testing.
scripts/distribution/run_gcp_quickstart.sh Added a "BACKFILL-JOIN" step to run a join backfill command using environment-specific configs; added start/end date params to backfill commands.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Script
    participant Zipline
    participant Config

    Script->>Zipline: Run backfill for view (BACKFILL-VIEW)
    Script->>Config: Select join config (v1_test or v1_dev)
    Script->>Zipline: Run backfill for join (BACKFILL-JOIN) with config
    Zipline-->>Script: Return status
    Script->>Script: Check for failure
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • nikhil-zlai
  • varant-zlai
  • piyush-zlai
  • david-zlai

Poem

New joins arise, the pipeline grows,
With configs chosen as the script now flows.
Canary or dev, the data aligns,
Backfill marches on, right on time.
Features assembled, tests in sight—
Code and data, joined just right!
🚀

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

GitHub Actions and Pipeline Checks: Resource not accessible by integration - https://docs.github.com/rest/actions/workflow-runs#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository.

Please grant the required permissions to the CodeRabbit GitHub App under the organization or repository settings.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
api/python/test/canary/joins/gcp/training_set.py (3)

7-21: Convert comment to proper docstring.

-"""
-This is the "left side" of the join that will comprise our training set. It is responsible for providing the primary keys
-and timestamps for which features will be computed.
-"""
+# This is the "left side" of the join that will comprise our training set. It is responsible for providing the primary keys
+# and timestamps for which features will be computed.

23-28: Add brief comment explaining v1_test's purpose.

Join definition lacks documentation.


30-35: Add brief comment explaining v1_dev's purpose.

Join definition lacks documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1af1abd and 247734c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • api/python/test/canary/joins/gcp/training_set.py (1 hunks)
  • scripts/distribution/run_gcp_quickstart.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
api/python/test/canary/joins/gcp/training_set.py (3)
api/python/ai/chronon/source.py (1)
  • EventSource (8-35)
api/src/main/scala/ai/chronon/api/Builders.scala (1)
  • Source (106-140)
api/python/ai/chronon/query.py (1)
  • selects (93-116)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (15)
  • GitHub Check: service_tests
  • GitHub Check: service_commons_tests
  • GitHub Check: service_tests
  • GitHub Check: online_tests
  • GitHub Check: online_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_gcp_tests
  • GitHub Check: flink_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_aws_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_gcp_tests
  • GitHub Check: api_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_aws_tests
  • GitHub Check: aggregator_tests
  • GitHub Check: api_tests
  • GitHub Check: aggregator_tests
  • GitHub Check: flink_tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/distribution/run_gcp_quickstart.sh (1)

146-153: New BACKFILL-JOIN step looks good.

Properly implements join backfill similar to existing backfill steps.

@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai force-pushed the tchow/add-join-integ branch from 2f5eb9a to dacd493 Compare May 2, 2025 18:32
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
scripts/distribution/run_gcp_quickstart.sh (3)

129-133: Parameterize date flags.
Extract --start-ds and --end-ds into top-level variables (e.g. START_DS/END_DS) instead of hard-coding here.


137-142: DRY backfill-view block.
This mirrors the purchases backfill. Factor out common logic into a loop or function.


144-144: Unify fail handler usage.
fail_if_bash_failed uses $? internally; drop the explicit $? argument or update the function signature.

Also applies to: 153-153

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 247734c and dacd493.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/distribution/run_gcp_quickstart.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: service_commons_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_gcp_tests
  • GitHub Check: service_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_aws_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_gcp_tests
  • GitHub Check: service_tests
  • GitHub Check: cloud_aws_tests
  • GitHub Check: online_tests
  • GitHub Check: online_tests
  • GitHub Check: api_tests
  • GitHub Check: flink_tests
  • GitHub Check: flink_tests
  • GitHub Check: api_tests
  • GitHub Check: aggregator_tests
  • GitHub Check: aggregator_tests
  • GitHub Check: python_tests
  • GitHub Check: enforce_triggered_workflows

Comment on lines +146 to 151
echo -e "${GREEN}<<<<<.....................................BACKFILL-JOIN.....................................>>>>>\033[0m"
if [[ "$ENVIRONMENT" == "canary" ]]; then
zipline run --repo=$CHRONON_ROOT --version $VERSION --mode backfill --conf compiled/joins/gcp/training_set.v1_test --start-ds 2023-11-01 --end-ds 2023-12-01
else
zipline run --repo=$CHRONON_ROOT --version $VERSION --mode backfill --conf compiled/joins/gcp/training_set.v1_dev --start-ds 2023-11-01 --end-ds 2023-12-01
fi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Validate join config existence.
Add a check like [[ -f compiled/joins/gcp/training_set.v1_${ENVIRONMENT} ]] || { echo "Missing join config"; exit 1; } before running.

@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai merged commit a684b5a into main May 5, 2025
20 checks passed
@tchow-zlai tchow-zlai deleted the tchow/add-join-integ branch May 5, 2025 17:48
chewy-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
## Summary

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new test for joining GCP-based training set data,
supporting different join configurations.
- Added a new backfill step for join operations in the data processing
pipeline, with environment-specific configuration handling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: thomaschow <[email protected]>
chewy-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
## Summary

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new test for joining GCP-based training set data,
supporting different join configurations.
- Added a new backfill step for join operations in the data processing
pipeline, with environment-specific configuration handling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: thomaschow <[email protected]>
chewy-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
## Summary

## Cheour clientslist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new test for joining GCP-based training set data,
supporting different join configurations.
- Added a new baour clientsfill step for join operations in the data processing
pipeline, with environment-specific configuration handling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to traour clients
the status of staour clientss when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: thomaschow <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants