Migrations & data storage for pre-DAG-sync#831
Conversation
b9c1782 to
58412a1
Compare
59d712d to
cea2917
Compare
e7bf6e1 to
785dd37
Compare
785dd37 to
a62a2e0
Compare
daira
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only cursory review so far.
0a75a07 to
e5c1386
Compare
e5c1386 to
cfd11f5
Compare
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #831 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.75% 70.23% +0.47%
==========================================
Files 124 127 +3
Lines 11618 11848 +230
==========================================
+ Hits 8104 8321 +217
- Misses 3514 3527 +13
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
cfd11f5 to
5124572
Compare
Local chain validation will be performed internal to `scan_cached_blocks`, and as handling of chain reorgs will need to change to support out-of-order scanning, the `validate_chain` method will be superfluous. It is removed in advance of other changes in order to avoid updating it to reflect the forthcoming changes.
71ac466 to
c4e11e6
Compare
|
force-pushed to address comments from code review. |
In preparation for out-of-order range-based scanning, it is necessary to ensure that the size of the Sapling note commitment tree is carried along through the scan process and that stored blocks are always persisted with the updated note commitment tree size.
b2e742d to
42ed6ba
Compare
|
force-pushed to fix an off-by-one error and fix |
| }, | ||
| )?; | ||
| block_source.with_blocks::<_, DbT::Error>(scan_from, limit, |block: CompactBlock| { | ||
| add_block_to_runner(params, block, &mut batch_runner); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It occurs to me that we should actually do the continuity check here, because there's no reason to add a block to the runner or continue the scan if the continuity check fails.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've made this change in the forthcoming range-suggestions PR.
| pub network: Network, | ||
| pub sapling_tree: ShardTree< | ||
| MemoryShardStore<sapling::Node, BlockHeight>, | ||
| { SAPLING_SHARD_HEIGHT * 2 }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| { SAPLING_SHARD_HEIGHT * 2 }, | |
| { sapling::NOTE_COMMITMENT_TREE_DEPTH }, |
| [patch.crates-io] | ||
| incrementalmerkletree = { git = "https://github.com/zcash/incrementalmerkletree.git", rev = "082109deacf8611ee7917732e19b56158bda96d5" } | ||
| shardtree = { git = "https://github.com/zcash/incrementalmerkletree.git", rev = "082109deacf8611ee7917732e19b56158bda96d5" } | ||
| orchard = { git = "https://github.com/zcash/orchard.git", rev = "5da41a6bbb44290e353ee4b38bcafe37ffe79ce8" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I verified that this is the latest commit in zcash/orchard#398.
| if expected_hash != block_hash { | ||
| return Err(SqliteClientError::BlockConflict(block_height)); | ||
| } |
zcash_client_sqlite/src/wallet/init/migrations/shardtree_support.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
I would like to finish my review before this merges (which I should be able to do tonight). Edit: had a terrible migraine. It's fine that this merged, I'll finish my review post-hoc anyway though. |
e6676c6 to
c13c8c6
Compare
|
I'm using c13c8c6 in zcash/lightwalletd#440; please do not rebase that commit. |
Based on #857