Conversation
WalkthroughThis PR updates the protographic CI workflow to include a dedicated lint/format step, adjusts the format script to rewrite files instead of checking only, and applies extensive formatting and documentation refinements across configuration, test, and documentation files. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2639 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 39.90% 89.29% +49.39%
===========================================
Files 969 21 -948
Lines 121820 4503 -117317
Branches 5469 1236 -4233
===========================================
- Hits 48609 4021 -44588
+ Misses 71517 482 -71035
+ Partials 1694 0 -1694 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…ting-drift-enable-ci-check
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores
Checklist
Fixing formatting drift. Formatting was not enforced in CI and that's why it happened probably.
Now we run
lint:fixwhich runs linter & formatter at the same time in the CI. Subsequent stepthen checks whether there are any uncomitted changes, so in case the formatting does not
happen, it will fail in this step.