feat(Webinar) - Locus API and DTO update for Webinar #3972
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a series of updates across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
warning [email protected]: This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (29)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/enums.ts (1)
5-5: Document FedRAMP compliance implications.Since this PR is related to FedRAMP compliance, please ensure that the role-based access control (RBAC) implications of this new setting are documented.
Consider adding a JSDoc comment above the enum explaining:
- The purpose of the
rolessetting- How it relates to FedRAMP requirements
- Any specific validation or security considerations
enum Setting { disallowUnmute = 'DisallowUnmute', muteOnEntry = 'MuteOnEntry', muted = 'Muted', + /** + * Controls role-based access settings for meeting participants. + * Required for FedRAMP compliance to enforce proper access control. + */ roles = 'Roles', }packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/types.ts (1)
39-40: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for the new properties.The new properties follow TypeScript best practices and integrate well with the existing interface structure. However, to maintain consistency with the codebase and improve maintainability, consider adding JSDoc comments explaining the purpose and behavior of these properties.
Add documentation like this:
export interface ViewTheParticipantListProperties { enabled?: boolean; + /** + * Controls whether panelist-specific features are enabled in the participant list. + */ panelistEnabled?: boolean; + /** + * Controls whether the total number of attendees is displayed. + */ attendeeCount?: boolean; }packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/fullState.ts (2)
Line range hint
13-24: Consider tracking attendee count changes.The
getFullStatemethod tracks various state changes, but doesn't monitor changes in attendee count. For webinar functionality, significant changes in participant numbers might be important to track.Consider adding an attendee count change detector:
return { previous, current, updates: { isMeetingEnded: FullState.isMeetingEnded(previous, current), isMeetingTerminating: FullState.isMeetingTerminating(previous, current), meetingTypeChangedTo: FullState.isTypeChanged(previous, current), meetingStateChangedTo: FullState.meetingStateChange(previous, current), + attendeeCountChanged: previous?.attendeeCount !== current?.attendeeCount, + attendeeCountDelta: current?.attendeeCount !== undefined && previous?.attendeeCount !== undefined + ? current.attendeeCount - previous.attendeeCount + : undefined, }, };
Line range hint
1-3: Enhance type safety and error handling for FedRAMP compliance.
- The use of
anytype bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which could lead to runtime errors.- Consider adding proper error handling and logging for FedRAMP compliance.
Consider these architectural improvements:
- Define proper TypeScript types for all entities
- Add error handling for invalid state transitions
- Implement logging for state changes and errors
- Add input validation for the
fullStateparameterExample:
import {Logger} from '../common/logging'; const logger = new Logger('FullState'); interface FullStateError extends Error { code: string; details: unknown; } class InvalidStateTransitionError extends Error implements FullStateError { code = 'INVALID_STATE_TRANSITION'; constructor(public details: {from: string; to: string}) { super(`Invalid state transition from ${details.from} to ${details.to}`); } } // Add error handling in state changes FullState.meetingStateChange = (previous, current) => { try { if (!previous || current.meetingState !== previous.meetingState) { logger.info('Meeting state changed', { from: previous?.meetingState, to: current?.meetingState }); return current && current.meetingState; } return null; } catch (error) { logger.error('Error in meeting state change', {error}); throw new InvalidStateTransitionError({ from: previous?.meetingState, to: current?.meetingState }); } };packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/webinar/index.ts (3)
21-24: Consider initializing boolean properties with default valuesWhile the boolean properties are well-documented, they should be initialized with default values to ensure consistent initial state.
- selfIsPanelist: 'boolean', // self is panelist - selfIsAttendee: 'boolean', // self is attendee + selfIsPanelist: { + type: 'boolean', + default: false + }, // self is panelist + selfIsAttendee: { + type: 'boolean', + default: false + }, // self is attendee
37-42: Improve payload documentationThe method documentation should specify the expected structure of the payload object, particularly the
resources.webcastInstance.urlpath./** * Update the current webcast instance url of the meeting - * @param {object} payload + * @param {object} payload - The webcast update payload + * @param {object} payload.resources - Resource information + * @param {object} payload.resources.webcastInstance - Webcast instance details + * @param {string} payload.resources.webcastInstance.url - The webcast instance URL * @returns {void} */
54-73: Consider refactoring role transition logic for better maintainabilityWhile the implementation is functionally correct, the role checking logic could be extracted into separate helper methods to improve readability and maintainability.
+ /** + * Checks if a role transition occurred + * @private + * @param {string[]} oldRoles - Previous roles + * @param {string[]} newRoles - New roles + * @param {string} fromRole - Starting role + * @param {string} toRole - Target role + * @returns {boolean} Whether the transition occurred + */ + _checkRoleTransition(oldRoles, newRoles, fromRole, toRole) { + return get(oldRoles, [], []).includes(fromRole) && + get(newRoles, [], []).includes(toRole); + } + /** * Updates user roles and manages associated state transitions * @param {object} payload * @param {string[]} payload.oldRoles - Previous roles of the user * @param {string[]} payload.newRoles - New roles of the user * @returns {{isPromoted: boolean, isDemoted: boolean}} Role transition states */ updateRoleChanged(payload) { - const isPromoted = - get(payload, 'oldRoles', []).includes(SELF_ROLES.ATTENDEE) && - get(payload, 'newRoles', []).includes(SELF_ROLES.PANELIST); - const isDemoted = - get(payload, 'oldRoles', []).includes(SELF_ROLES.PANELIST) && - get(payload, 'newRoles', []).includes(SELF_ROLES.ATTENDEE); + const {oldRoles, newRoles} = payload; + const isPromoted = this._checkRoleTransition(oldRoles, newRoles, SELF_ROLES.ATTENDEE, SELF_ROLES.PANELIST); + const isDemoted = this._checkRoleTransition(oldRoles, newRoles, SELF_ROLES.PANELIST, SELF_ROLES.ATTENDEE);packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/webinar/index.ts (3)
32-36: LGTM! Consider enhancing the test description.The test correctly verifies the basic functionality of updating the webcast URL. Consider making the test description more specific by renaming it to "sets the webcast instance url when provided with valid resources".
63-77: Consider refactoring test data for better maintainability.While the test is comprehensive, consider extracting the test data and expected results into constants to improve maintainability and reusability.
Example refactor:
const ROLE_TEST_CASES = { ATTENDEE_TO_PANELIST: { input: { oldRoles: ['ATTENDEE'], newRoles: ['PANELIST'] }, expected: { selfIsPanelist: true, selfIsAttendee: false, canManageWebcast: false, isPromoted: true, isDemoted: false } } // Add other test cases here };
79-122: Consider adding a helper function to reduce assertion duplication.The role transition tests are comprehensive but contain repeated assertion patterns. Consider creating a helper function to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Example helper function:
function assertRoleState(result: any, expected: { selfIsPanelist: boolean, selfIsAttendee: boolean, canManageWebcast: boolean, isPromoted: boolean, isDemoted: boolean }) { assert.equal(webinar.selfIsPanelist, expected.selfIsPanelist, `self should ${expected.selfIsPanelist ? '' : 'not '}be a panelist`); assert.equal(webinar.selfIsAttendee, expected.selfIsAttendee, `self should ${expected.selfIsAttendee ? '' : 'not '}be an attendee`); assert.equal(webinar.canManageWebcast, expected.canManageWebcast, `self should ${expected.canManageWebcast ? '' : 'not '}have manage webcast capability`); assert.equal(result.isPromoted, expected.isPromoted, `should ${expected.isPromoted ? '' : 'not '}indicate promotion`); assert.equal(result.isDemoted, expected.isDemoted, `should ${expected.isDemoted ? '' : 'not '}indicate demotion`); }packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/meeting/in-meeting-actions.ts (1)
Add Tests for Multiple Property Settings and State Transitions
Edge cases like setting multiple properties simultaneously and state transitions are not sufficiently covered. Please include tests for these scenarios to enhance test coverage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-192: Verify test coverage for edge cases.While the basic get/set functionality is tested, consider adding tests for the following scenarios:
- Setting multiple properties simultaneously
- Setting invalid values
- State transitions (e.g., enabling then disabling a feature)
Let's check if these scenarios are covered elsewhere:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for additional test cases in the meetings test files rg -t ts "InMeetingActions.*set.*multiple|invalid|transition" "packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test"Length of output: 2273
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/index.ts (1)
273-274: Enhance documentation for the roles parameterThe JSDoc comment for the roles parameter should specify:
- The expected format of role strings
- Any constraints or valid values
- Whether the parameter is optional
- * @param {array} roles which should be muted + * @param {Array<string>} roles - Array of role identifiers that should be muted. + * Valid values are: ['PRESENTER', 'MODERATOR', etc.]. + * Pass an empty array to apply to all roles.packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/controlsUtils.ts (3)
145-149: Consider extracting complex condition to a separate functionWhile the logic is correct, the multiple conditions make it harder to read. Consider extracting this into a separate function for better maintainability.
+private hasViewTheParticipantListPropertiesChanged( + current: any, + previous: any +): boolean { + return ( + current?.viewTheParticipantList?.enabled !== previous?.viewTheParticipantList?.enabled || + current?.viewTheParticipantList?.panelistEnabled !== + previous?.viewTheParticipantList?.panelistEnabled || + current?.viewTheParticipantList?.attendeeCount !== + previous?.viewTheParticipantList?.attendeeCount + ); +} updates: { - hasViewTheParticipantListChanged: - current?.viewTheParticipantList?.enabled !== previous?.viewTheParticipantList?.enabled || - current?.viewTheParticipantList?.panelistEnabled !== - previous?.viewTheParticipantList?.panelistEnabled || - current?.viewTheParticipantList?.attendeeCount !== - previous?.viewTheParticipantList?.attendeeCount, + hasViewTheParticipantListChanged: this.hasViewTheParticipantListPropertiesChanged( + current, + previous + ),
196-211: Consider consistent null handling across change detectionThe new change detection logic uses
isEqualconsistently, but the null handling varies:
hasWebcastChangedrelies solely onisEqualhasMeetingFullChangeduses multipleisEqualcheckshasPracticeSessionEnabledChangeduses a singleisEqualConsider standardizing the approach:
- hasWebcastChanged: !isEqual( - previous?.webcastControl?.streaming, - current?.webcastControl?.streaming - ), + hasWebcastChanged: !!( + current?.webcastControl && + !isEqual(previous?.webcastControl?.streaming, current?.webcastControl?.streaming) + ), - hasMeetingFullChanged: - !isEqual(previous?.meetingFull?.meetingFull, current?.meetingFull?.meetingFull) || - !isEqual( - previous?.meetingFull?.meetingPanelistFull, - current?.meetingFull?.meetingPanelistFull - ), + hasMeetingFullChanged: !!( + current?.meetingFull && + (!isEqual(previous?.meetingFull?.meetingFull, current?.meetingFull?.meetingFull) || + !isEqual(previous?.meetingFull?.meetingPanelistFull, current?.meetingFull?.meetingPanelistFull)) + ), - hasPracticeSessionEnabledChanged: !isEqual( - previous?.practiceSession?.enabled, - current?.practiceSession?.enabled - ), + hasPracticeSessionEnabledChanged: !!( + current?.practiceSession && + !isEqual(previous?.practiceSession?.enabled, current?.practiceSession?.enabled) + ),
Line range hint
1-276: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for controlsThe file uses
anytype extensively. Consider defining proper TypeScript interfaces for the control objects to improve type safety and developer experience.Example interface structure:
interface WebcastControl { streaming: boolean; } interface MeetingFullControl { meetingFull: boolean; meetingPanelistFull: boolean; } interface PracticeSessionControl { enabled: boolean; } interface ViewTheParticipantListControl { enabled: boolean; panelistEnabled: boolean; attendeeCount: number; } interface LocusControls { webcastControl?: WebcastControl; meetingFull?: MeetingFullControl; practiceSession?: PracticeSessionControl; viewTheParticipantList?: ViewTheParticipantListControl; // ... other controls }packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/in-meeting-actions.ts (1)
67-70: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The new interface properties are well-structured and follow existing naming conventions. However, adding JSDoc comments would improve documentation, especially for the webinar-specific functionality.
Add JSDoc comments for the new properties:
+ /** Controls whether panelists can view the participants list */ canEnableViewTheParticipantsListPanelist?: boolean; + /** Controls whether panelists can hide the participants list */ canDisableViewTheParticipantsListPanelist?: boolean; + /** Controls whether the attendee count can be shown */ canEnableShowAttendeeCount?: boolean; + /** Controls whether the attendee count can be hidden */ canDisableShowAttendeeCount?: boolean; ... + /** Controls whether a webcast can be started */ canStartWebcast?: boolean; + /** Controls whether a webcast can be stopped */ canStopWebcast?: boolean;Also applies to: 90-91
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/util.ts (1)
220-231: Enhance documentation and consider refactoring for maintainability.While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- Update the method's JSDoc to document the new properties and their purpose
- Consider refactoring the repetitive boolean checks into a helper function
Here's a suggested refactor:
/** * Validate if an view-the-participants-list-scoped control is allowed to be sent to the service. * * @param {ControlConfig<ViewTheParticipantListProperties>} control - View Participants List control config to validate. * @param {Array<string>} displayHints - All available hints. + * @property {boolean} [control.properties.enabled] - Controls overall visibility of participant list + * @property {boolean} [control.properties.panelistEnabled] - Controls visibility of panelist participants + * @property {boolean} [control.properties.attendeeCount] - Controls visibility of attendee count * @returns {boolean} - True if all of the actions are allowed. */ + private static addHintForProperty( + property: boolean | undefined, + enableHint: string, + disableHint: string, + hints: string[] + ) { + if (property === true) { + hints.push(enableHint); + } else if (property === false) { + hints.push(disableHint); + } + } public static canUpdateViewTheParticipantsList( control: ControlConfig<ViewTheParticipantListProperties>, displayHints: Array<string> ) { const requiredHints = []; - if (control.properties.enabled === true) { - requiredHints.push(DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST); - } - if (control.properties.enabled === false) { - requiredHints.push(DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST); - } - if (control.properties.panelistEnabled === true) { - requiredHints.push(DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST_PANELIST); - } - if (control.properties.panelistEnabled === false) { - requiredHints.push(DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST_PANELIST); - } - if (control.properties.attendeeCount === true) { - requiredHints.push(DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_SHOW_ATTENDEE_COUNT); - } - if (control.properties.attendeeCount === false) { - requiredHints.push(DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_SHOW_ATTENDEE_COUNT); - } + Utils.addHintForProperty( + control.properties.enabled, + DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST, + DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST, + requiredHints + ); + Utils.addHintForProperty( + control.properties.panelistEnabled, + DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST_PANELIST, + DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST_PANELIST, + requiredHints + ); + Utils.addHintForProperty( + control.properties.attendeeCount, + DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_SHOW_ATTENDEE_COUNT, + DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_SHOW_ATTENDEE_COUNT, + requiredHints + ); return Utils.hasHints({requiredHints, displayHints}); }packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/controls-options-manager/index.js (2)
82-120: Enhance test descriptions for clarityWhile the test implementation is solid, consider making the test descriptions more specific about the scenarios being tested. For example:
- "rejects when correct display hint is not present enabled=false" could be "rejects disallow unmute when ENABLE_HARD_MUTE hint is missing"
- "can set disallow unmute when ENABLE_HARD_MUTE display hint is available" could be "enables hard mute when ENABLE_HARD_MUTE display hint is present"
Line range hint
238-283: Consolidate duplicate test casesThere are three identical test cases with the description "can set mute all when the display hint is available mutedEnabled=true" that only differ in display hints but have the same assertions. Consider consolidating these into a single parameterized test case to improve maintainability.
Example refactor:
[ ['MUTE_ALL', 'ENABLE_HARD_MUTE', 'ENABLE_MUTE_ON_ENTRY'], ['MUTE_ALL', 'DISABLE_HARD_MUTE', 'ENABLE_MUTE_ON_ENTRY'], ['MUTE_ALL', 'DISABLE_HARD_MUTE', 'DISABLE_MUTE_ON_ENTRY'] ].forEach((hints) => { it(`can set mute all with display hints: ${hints.join(', ')}`, () => { manager.setDisplayHints(hints); const result = manager.setMuteAll(true, true, true); // ... assertions ... }); });packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/locus-info/controlsUtils.js (2)
85-91: LGTM! Consider grouping related test cases.The test coverage for
viewTheParticipantListcontrol is comprehensive, testing both parsing and state changes for all properties. However, consider grouping the property change tests into a describe block for better organization.it('returns hasViewTheParticipantListChanged = true when changed', () => { - const oldControls = {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: false}}; - - let result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: false, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: false}}); - assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, true); - - result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: false, attendeeCount: false}}); - assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, true); - - result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: true}}); - assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, true); - - result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: false}}); - assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, false); + describe('viewTheParticipantList property changes', () => { + const oldControls = {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: false}}; + + it('detects enabled property change', () => { + const result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: false, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: false}}); + assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, true); + }); + + it('detects panelistEnabled property change', () => { + const result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: false, attendeeCount: false}}); + assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, true); + }); + + it('detects attendeeCount property change', () => { + const result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: true}}); + assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, true); + }); + + it('returns false when no properties change', () => { + const result = ControlsUtils.getControls(oldControls, {viewTheParticipantList: {enabled: true, panelistEnabled: true, attendeeCount: false}}); + assert.equal(result.updates.hasViewTheParticipantListChanged, false); + }); + });Also applies to: 200-214
118-125: Add test case for individual property changes.While the test coverage is good, consider adding a separate test case for the
meetingPanelistFullproperty change to ensure complete coverage of all possible state changes.it('returns hasMeetingFullChanged = true when changed', () => { const newControls = {meetingFull: {meetingFull: true, meetingPanelistFull: false}}; let result = ControlsUtils.getControls(defaultControls, newControls); assert.equal(result.updates.hasMeetingFullChanged, true); - result = ControlsUtils.getControls(newControls, {meetingFull: {meetingFull: true, meetingPanelistFull: true}}); + // Test meetingFull property change + result = ControlsUtils.getControls(newControls, {meetingFull: {meetingFull: false, meetingPanelistFull: false}}); + assert.equal(result.updates.hasMeetingFullChanged, true); + + // Test meetingPanelistFull property change + result = ControlsUtils.getControls(newControls, {meetingFull: {meetingFull: true, meetingPanelistFull: true}}); assert.equal(result.updates.hasMeetingFullChanged, true); + + // Test no changes + result = ControlsUtils.getControls(newControls, {meetingFull: {meetingFull: true, meetingPanelistFull: false}}); + assert.equal(result.updates.hasMeetingFullChanged, false); });Also applies to: 241-251
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/controls-options-manager/util.js (1)
351-394: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for participant list visibility controls.The new test cases thoroughly verify the behavior of
canUpdateViewTheParticipantsList()for all combinations ofpanelistEnabledandattendeeCountproperties.Consider these minor improvements:
- Make the test descriptions more precise by using "when all properties are set to" instead of just "when".
- Fix inconsistent indentation in the
requiredHintsarrays. Apply this diff:- requiredHints: [DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST, - DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST_PANELIST, - DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_SHOW_ATTENDEE_COUNT], + requiredHints: [ + DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST, + DISPLAY_HINTS.ENABLE_VIEW_THE_PARTICIPANT_LIST_PANELIST, + DISPLAY_HINTS.DISABLE_SHOW_ATTENDEE_COUNT + ],packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/index.ts (2)
67-67: Consider using a more specific type for theresourcesproperty.The property type can be more strictly defined based on its usage in the
updateResourcesmethod.- resources: any; + resources: Record<'webcastInstance', {url: string}> | null;
1097-1116: Add JSDoc parameter type documentation.The method should include proper JSDoc documentation for the
resourcesparameter type./** * @param {Object} resources + * @param {Object} resources.webcastInstance + * @param {string} resources.webcastInstance.url * @returns {undefined} * @memberof LocusInfo */packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (1)
7980-7994: Add parameter descriptions to the JSDoc forsetMuteAllmethodThe JSDoc comments for
setMuteAllshould include descriptions for each parameter to improve maintainability and readability.Apply this diff to update the JSDoc:
/** * Set the mute all flag for participants if you're the host + * * @param {boolean} mutedEnabled - Whether to mute all participants * @param {boolean} disallowUnmuteEnabled - Whether participants are allowed to unmute themselves + * @param {boolean} muteOnEntryEnabled - Whether to mute participants upon entry + * @param {Array<string>} roles - Roles to apply the mute settings to * @returns {Promise} * @public * @memberof Meeting */packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/meeting/index.js (4)
8866-8882: Add tests for new MEETING_CONTROLS_WEBCAST_UPDATED eventThe new
MEETING_CONTROLS_WEBCAST_UPDATEDevent is being listened for and triggered correctly in thesetupLocusControlsListenermethod.Consider adding a test to verify that the event payload is passed through correctly when triggering the event.
8884-8901: Add tests for new MEETING_CONTROLS_MEETING_FULL_UPDATED eventThe new
MEETING_CONTROLS_MEETING_FULL_UPDATEDevent is being listened for and triggered correctly in thesetupLocusControlsListenermethod.Consider adding a test to verify that the event payload is passed through correctly when triggering the event.
8902-8918: Add tests for new MEETING_CONTROLS_PRACTICE_SESSION_STATUS_UPDATED eventThe new
MEETING_CONTROLS_PRACTICE_SESSION_STATUS_UPDATEDevent is being listened for and triggered correctly in thesetupLocusControlsListenermethod.Consider adding a test to verify that the event payload is passed through correctly when triggering the event.
9070-9095: Add tests for new setUpLocusResourcesListener methodThe new
setUpLocusResourcesListenermethod is correctly listening for theLINKS_RESOURCESevent and calling theupdateWebcastUrlmethod on thewebinarinstance with the receivednewLocusResources.Consider adding a test to verify the behavior when
newLocusResourcescontains awebcastInstanceobject vs when it doesn't.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/constants.ts(5 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/enums.ts(1 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/index.ts(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/util.ts(1 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/controlsUtils.ts(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/fullState.ts(1 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/index.ts(6 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/in-meeting-actions.ts(6 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts(7 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/webinar/index.ts(3 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/controls-options-manager/index.js(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/controls-options-manager/util.js(1 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/locus-info/controlsUtils.js(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/locus-info/index.js(5 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/meeting/in-meeting-actions.ts(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/meeting/index.js(2 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/webinar/index.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (31)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/enums.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM! Verify consistent usage across the codebase.
The addition of the roles setting follows the existing naming convention and is properly placed. Let's verify its usage across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The roles setting is consistently used across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new Setting.roles enum member
# Expected: Should find references in control management and participant visibility logic
# Search for direct usage of Setting.roles
rg -t typescript "Setting\.roles" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/
# Search for string literal 'Roles' in relevant contexts
rg -t typescript "['\"](Roles)['\"]" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
Length of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new Setting.roles enum member
# Expected: Should find references in control management and participant visibility logic
# Search for direct usage of Setting.roles
rg "Setting\.roles" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/ --type ts
# Search for string literal 'Roles' in relevant contexts
rg "['\"]Roles['\"]" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/ --type ts
Length of output: 454
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/webinar/index.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Good use of lodash's get for safe property access
The addition of lodash's get utility ensures safe property access throughout the code, preventing potential undefined property access errors.
61-73: Verify role transition handling across the system
The role transition logic might affect other parts of the system that depend on these state changes.
✅ Verification successful
Role transition handling verified
Changes are confined to the plugin-meetings module and do not impact other parts of the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by role transitions
echo "Searching for role transition dependencies..."
rg -l "updateRoleChanged|selfIsPanelist|selfIsAttendee" --type ts
# Search for event handlers that might need updates
echo "Searching for related event handlers..."
ast-grep --pattern 'on($_, "role-changed")' --lang ts
Length of output: 483
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/webinar/index.ts (1)
42-59: Well-structured error handling tests!
Excellent coverage of edge cases with clear assertions and meaningful error messages. The tests effectively verify graceful handling of missing or incomplete data.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/meeting/in-meeting-actions.ts (3)
63-66: LGTM: New properties for participant list and attendee count controls.
The additions properly extend the expectedValues object with new properties for managing panelist-specific participant list visibility and attendee count display controls.
86-87: LGTM: New properties for webcast controls.
The additions properly extend the expectedValues object with webcast start/stop control properties.
153-156: LGTM: Test cases for new control properties.
The test cases array is properly updated to include all new properties, ensuring that get/set functionality is tested for:
- Panelist-specific participant list visibility
- Attendee count display
- Webcast controls
Also applies to: 176-177
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/index.ts (2)
193-193: LGTM! Good defensive programming practice
The addition of the value !== undefined check improves the robustness of the validation logic by properly handling falsy values.
Line range hint 180-287: Verify role-based muting implementation across the codebase
The introduction of role-based muting is a significant change. Let's verify its usage and integration.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/controlsUtils.ts (2)
82-86: LGTM: Proper null handling in viewTheParticipantList parsing
The use of nullish coalescing operator (??) for default values is a good practice. The new properties align well with webinar functionality requirements.
97-112: LGTM: Well-structured new control parsers
The new control parsers for webcastControl, meetingFull, and practiceSession follow consistent patterns and include proper null checks.
Let's verify the usage of these new controls:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: New controls are correctly utilized
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to ensure these controls are properly utilized
rg -l "webcastControl|meetingFull|practiceSession" --type ts
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines where the new controls are utilized in index.ts for deeper inspection
rg "webcastControl|meetingFull|practiceSession" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/index.ts
Length of output: 229
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines with surrounding context where the new controls are utilized in index.ts for deeper inspection
rg "webcastControl|meetingFull|practiceSession" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/index.ts -C 3
Length of output: 735
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/in-meeting-actions.ts (3)
210-217: LGTM! Property declarations are consistent.
The new class properties follow the established pattern of null initialization and maintain consistent spacing.
Also applies to: 255-258
319-322: Verify setter handling for new properties.
The getter method is properly updated to include all new properties. However, let's verify that the setter logic in the set method properly handles these new properties.
Also applies to: 342-343
67-70: Verify test coverage and integration with webinar feature.
The changes look good but please ensure:
- Unit tests are updated to cover the new properties
- Integration tests verify the interaction between these controls and the webinar functionality
- Documentation is updated to reflect these new capabilities
Also applies to: 90-91, 210-217, 255-258, 319-322, 342-343
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/util.ts (1)
220-231: Security validation looks good.
The implementation properly validates permissions through display hints and follows the established security patterns. This is particularly important for FedRAMP compliance.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/controls-options-manager/index.js (2)
Line range hint 25-78: LGTM: Well-structured test cases for mute-on-entry functionality
The test cases thoroughly cover both positive and negative scenarios for the setMuteOnEntry functionality, including proper validation of display hints and request parameters.
285-307: Verify role-specific muting functionality
The new test cases for role-specific muting look good and align with the webinar functionality requirements. However, let's verify the implementation of this feature in the source code.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/locus-info/controlsUtils.js (2)
110-116: LGTM! Tests for webcast control are well-structured.
The test coverage for the webcast control's streaming property is appropriate and follows the established pattern in the test suite.
Also applies to: 233-239
127-133: LGTM! Tests for practice session control are well-structured.
The test coverage for the practice session control's enabled property is appropriate and follows the established pattern in the test suite.
Also applies to: 253-259
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/constants.ts (2)
359-362: LGTM: Event constants for webcast and meeting controls
The new event constants follow the established naming patterns and maintain consistency with the existing codebase.
Also applies to: 678-680
950-954: LGTM: Display hints for webinar features
The new display hints for participant list controls and webcast features follow the established patterns and enhance webinar functionality.
Also applies to: 974-977
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/locus-info/index.ts (2)
811-813: LGTM! New control flags are well integrated.
The new control flags follow the existing pattern and are properly integrated into the control updates structure.
1017-1040: LGTM! New control event handlers are properly implemented.
The new event handlers for webcast, meeting full status, and practice session status follow the established pattern and are well-integrated with the existing event handling system.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/locus-info/index.js (2)
Line range hint 84-105: LGTM! Test setup is comprehensive.
The new control properties are well-structured and include appropriate test values for both positive and negative cases.
1773-1773: LGTM! Stub integration is correct.
The updateResources stub is properly integrated into the test case and follows the established pattern of verifying that methods are not called when handling breakout LEFT messages.
Also applies to: 1795-1795
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (5)
2007-2007: Added setUpLocusResourcesListener to setUpLocusInfoListeners
2638-2655: Added event listeners for webcast and meeting full status updates
The new event listeners for CONTROLS_WEBCAST_CHANGED and CONTROLS_MEETING_FULL_CHANGED are correctly added to handle webcast state updates.
3340-3340: Update webinar role changes in SELF_ROLES_CHANGED handler
The updateRoleChanged method is correctly called on this.webinar to handle role changes.
3834-3849: Added support for participant list panelist and attendee count controls
New properties canEnableViewTheParticipantsListPanelist, canDisableViewTheParticipantsListPanelist, canEnableShowAttendeeCount, and canDisableShowAttendeeCount are properly added to inMeetingActions.
3866-3873: Added webcast control actions to inMeetingActions
The properties canStartWebcast and canStopWebcast are correctly implemented to manage webcast controls.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/meeting/index.js (1)
9065-9068: LGTM!
The setUpLocusServicesListener method is correctly listening for the LINKS_SERVICES event and calling the appropriate methods on the recordingController and simultaneousInterpretation instances.
| panelistEnabled?: boolean; | ||
| attendeeCount?: boolean; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing test coverage for webinar control properties.
The properties panelistEnabled and attendeeCount are integrated with webinar functionality but lack corresponding tests to verify their behavior. Additionally, please ensure that FedRAMP documentation adequately covers these properties.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify integration with webinar functionality and FedRAMP compliance.
Since these properties are part of webinar controls, let's verify their integration:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of new properties and related webinar functionality
# Check for usage of these properties in the codebase
echo "Checking usage of new properties..."
rg -t typescript "panelistEnabled|attendeeCount" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/
# Check for webinar-related test coverage
echo "Checking test coverage..."
rg -t typescript "describe.*ViewTheParticipantList" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/
# Check for FedRAMP compliance documentation
echo "Checking FedRAMP documentation..."
fd -t f "README|SECURITY" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/
Length of output: 735
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of new properties and related webinar functionality with corrected file types
# Check for usage of these properties in the codebase
echo "Checking usage of new properties..."
rg --type-add 'ts=**/*.ts' --type-add 'tsx=**/*.tsx' -t ts -t tsx "panelistEnabled|attendeeCount" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/
# Check for webinar-related test coverage
echo "Checking test coverage..."
rg --type-add 'ts=**/*.ts' --type-add 'tsx=**/*.tsx' -t ts -t tsx "describe.*ViewTheParticipantList" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/
# Check for FedRAMP compliance documentation
echo "Checking FedRAMP documentation..."
fd -t f 'README|SECURITY' packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/
Length of output: 883
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of new properties and related webinar functionality by searching .ts and .tsx files
# Check for usage of these properties in the codebase
echo "Checking usage of new properties..."
rg "panelistEnabled|attendeeCount" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/ --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"
# Check for webinar-related test coverage
echo "Checking test coverage..."
rg "describe.*ViewTheParticipantList" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/ --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"
# Check for FedRAMP compliance documentation
echo "Checking FedRAMP documentation..."
fd -t f 'README|SECURITY' packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/
Length of output: 2319
| @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ FullState.parse = (fullState) => ({ | |||
| type: fullState.type || FULL_STATE.UNKNOWN, | |||
| meetingState: fullState.state, | |||
| locked: fullState.locked, | |||
| attendeeCount: typeof fullState.attendeeCount === 'number' ? fullState.attendeeCount : 0, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving type safety and default value handling.
While the type check for attendeeCount is good, there are several improvements that could be made:
- The default value of 0 might be misleading in error scenarios - consider using
undefinedornullto clearly indicate missing data. - The property should be properly typed using TypeScript interfaces.
Consider applying these changes:
- const FullState: any = {};
+ interface FullStateData {
+ type: string;
+ state?: string;
+ locked?: boolean;
+ attendeeCount?: number;
+ }
+
+ interface ParsedFullState {
+ type: string;
+ meetingState: string | undefined;
+ locked: boolean | undefined;
+ attendeeCount: number | undefined;
+ }
+
+ const FullState = {
+ parse(fullState: FullStateData): ParsedFullState => ({
type: fullState.type || FULL_STATE.UNKNOWN,
meetingState: fullState.state,
locked: fullState.locked,
- attendeeCount: typeof fullState.attendeeCount === 'number' ? fullState.attendeeCount : 0,
+ attendeeCount: typeof fullState.attendeeCount === 'number' ? fullState.attendeeCount : undefined,
});
+ };Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ export default class ControlsOptionsManager { | |||
| * @memberof ControlsOptionsManager | |||
| * @returns {Promise} | |||
| */ | |||
| private setControls(setting: {[key in Setting]?: boolean}): Promise<any> { | |||
| private setControls(setting: {[key in Setting]?: any}): Promise<any> { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a more specific type for the setting parameter
The type {[key in Setting]?: any} is too permissive and could lead to runtime errors. Consider using a discriminated union type to explicitly define allowed values for each setting.
- private setControls(setting: {[key in Setting]?: any}): Promise<any> {
+ private setControls(setting: {
+ [Setting.muted]?: boolean;
+ [Setting.disallowUnmute]?: boolean;
+ [Setting.muteOnEntry]?: boolean;
+ [Setting.roles]?: Array<string>;
+ }): Promise<any> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private setControls(setting: {[key in Setting]?: any}): Promise<any> { | |
| private setControls(setting: { | |
| [Setting.muted]?: boolean; | |
| [Setting.disallowUnmute]?: boolean; | |
| [Setting.muteOnEntry]?: boolean; | |
| [Setting.roles]?: Array<string>; | |
| }): Promise<any> { |
| case Setting.roles: | ||
| if (Array.isArray(value)) { | ||
| body.audio = body.audio | ||
| ? {...body.audio, [camelCase(key)]: value} | ||
| : {[camelCase(key)]: value}; | ||
| } | ||
| break; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for role values
While the array check is good, consider adding validation for the role strings to prevent invalid roles from being processed.
case Setting.roles:
if (Array.isArray(value)) {
+ // Validate that all roles are valid strings
+ if (!value.every((role) => typeof role === 'string' && role.trim().length > 0)) {
+ error = new PermissionError('Invalid role value detected');
+ break;
+ }
body.audio = body.audio
? {...body.audio, [camelCase(key)]: value}
: {[camelCase(key)]: value};
}
break;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| case Setting.roles: | |
| if (Array.isArray(value)) { | |
| body.audio = body.audio | |
| ? {...body.audio, [camelCase(key)]: value} | |
| : {[camelCase(key)]: value}; | |
| } | |
| break; | |
| case Setting.roles: | |
| if (Array.isArray(value)) { | |
| // Validate that all roles are valid strings | |
| if (!value.every((role) => typeof role === 'string' && role.trim().length > 0)) { | |
| error = new PermissionError('Invalid role value detected'); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| body.audio = body.audio | |
| ? {...body.audio, [camelCase(key)]: value} | |
| : {[camelCase(key)]: value}; | |
| } | |
| break; |
| /** | ||
| * Set up the locus info resources link listener | ||
| * update the locusInfo for webcast instance url | ||
| * does not currently re-emit the event as it's internal only | ||
| * payload is unused | ||
| * @returns {undefined} | ||
| * @private | ||
| * @memberof Meeting | ||
| */ | ||
| private setUpLocusResourcesListener() { | ||
| this.locusInfo.on(LOCUSINFO.EVENTS.LINKS_RESOURCES, (payload) => { | ||
| this.webinar.updateWebcastUrl(payload); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the JSDoc comment for setUpLocusResourcesListener
The comment incorrectly states that "payload is unused," but the payload parameter is used in the method. Please update the comment to accurately reflect the usage of payload.
Apply this diff to fix the comment:
/**
* Set up the locus info resources link listener
* update the locusInfo for webcast instance url
- * does not currently re-emit the event as it's internal only
- * payload is unused
+ * @param {Object} payload - The event payload
* @returns {undefined}
* @private
* @memberof Meeting
*/📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /** | |
| * Set up the locus info resources link listener | |
| * update the locusInfo for webcast instance url | |
| * does not currently re-emit the event as it's internal only | |
| * payload is unused | |
| * @returns {undefined} | |
| * @private | |
| * @memberof Meeting | |
| */ | |
| private setUpLocusResourcesListener() { | |
| this.locusInfo.on(LOCUSINFO.EVENTS.LINKS_RESOURCES, (payload) => { | |
| this.webinar.updateWebcastUrl(payload); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Set up the locus info resources link listener | |
| * update the locusInfo for webcast instance url | |
| * @param {Object} payload - The event payload | |
| * @returns {undefined} | |
| * @private | |
| * @memberof Meeting | |
| */ | |
| private setUpLocusResourcesListener() { | |
| this.locusInfo.on(LOCUSINFO.EVENTS.LINKS_RESOURCES, (payload) => { | |
| this.webinar.updateWebcastUrl(payload); | |
| }); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/index.ts (1)
278-292: Enhance JSDoc documentation for FedRAMP complianceThe roles parameter documentation should be more descriptive to meet FedRAMP requirements. Consider:
- Describing valid role values
- Explaining the impact of role-based muting
- Documenting any security implications
/** * @public * @param {boolean} mutedEnabled * @param {boolean} disallowUnmuteEnabled * @param {boolean} muteOnEntryEnabled - * @param {array} roles which should be muted + * @param {Array<string>} roles - List of participant roles to be muted. + * Valid values include: 'HOST', 'PRESENTER', 'ATTENDEE'. + * If empty, applies to all participants. + * Note: Role-based muting respects the meeting's security policy. * @memberof ControlsOptionsManager * @returns {Promise} */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/index.ts(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/index.ts (3)
198-198: LGTM! Good defensive programming
The undefined check before permission validation prevents unnecessary checks and potential false negatives.
228-234: Skip comment as it's covered by past review
A previous review already suggested adding validation for role values.
Line range hint 180-292: Verify role-based control enforcement
Given the security implications of role-based controls and FedRAMP requirements, let's verify the enforcement mechanism.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the code, I can now generate the final response:
Role-based controls are properly enforced with layered security
The implementation shows a robust security model for role-based controls:
- Permissions are enforced through display hints validation before any control changes
- Role modifications are properly validated through the
setControlsmethod - The system uses a comprehensive permission checking system through the Utils class
- Changes to roles are properly encapsulated within the audio control context
- Error handling is in place with PermissionError for unauthorized actions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper role validation and enforcement across the codebase
# Look for role validation patterns
echo "Checking role validation patterns..."
rg -l "roles?.*(includes|indexOf|some|every|test|match)" --type typescript
# Check for potential role bypass attempts
echo "Checking potential role bypass patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($COND) {
$$$
roles
$$$
}'
# Look for role-related security tests
echo "Checking role-related test coverage..."
rg -l "describe.*role.*security|test.*role.*permission" --type typescript
Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check role validation and enforcement
# Look for role validation patterns without file type restriction
echo "Checking role validation patterns..."
rg -l "roles?.*(includes|indexOf|some|every|test|match)"
# Search for role-related security checks in the util file referenced in the code
echo "Checking Util implementation for role checks..."
rg -A 5 "CAN_SET|CAN_UNSET" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Look for role-related test files
echo "Checking role-related test coverage..."
fd -g "*test*" -g "*spec*" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Check for role validation in the Setting enum
echo "Checking Setting enum implementation..."
rg "enum Setting" -A 10 packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
Length of output: 3654
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Util implementation that handles the permission checks
# Look for Util implementation
echo "Checking Util implementation..."
rg -A 10 "class.*Util|const.*Util" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Check for displayHints usage which is used in permission checks
echo "Checking displayHints implementation..."
rg -A 5 "displayHints" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Look for permission-related constants and types
echo "Checking permission-related types..."
rg -A 5 "interface.*Hints|type.*Hints" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Check for any validation in the request handling
echo "Checking request validation..."
rg -A 5 "request\(" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
Length of output: 28353
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the display hints constants and role validation
# Look for display hints constants
echo "Checking display hints constants..."
rg "DISPLAY_HINTS" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Check for role-related constants
echo "Checking role-related constants..."
rg "roles?.*(MODERATOR|ADMIN|HOST)" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
# Look for any role validation in the setControls method
echo "Checking role validation in setControls..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Setting.roles'
# Check for any role-related error handling
echo "Checking role-related error handling..."
rg "PermissionError.*role" packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/controls-options-manager/
Length of output: 4707
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (5)
3017-3028: LGTM! Clean implementation of the resources listener
The new setUpLocusResourcesListener() method follows good separation of concerns by handling webcast URL updates in a dedicated listener.
2629-2636: LGTM! Well-structured webcast control event handling
The webcast control state change handling follows the established event handling pattern and integrates cleanly with the existing code.
2638-2645: LGTM! Clean implementation of meeting full state handling
The meeting full state change handling follows the established pattern and provides good event propagation.
2647-2654: LGTM! Well-integrated practice session status handling
The practice session status update handling follows the established pattern and integrates well with the existing code.
3339-3339: LGTM! Clean role change handling for webinar
The webinar role change handling is cleanly integrated into the existing role change logic.
| private setControls(setting: { | ||
| [Setting.muted]?: boolean; | ||
| [Setting.disallowUnmute]?: boolean; | ||
| [Setting.muteOnEntry]?: boolean; | ||
| [Setting.roles]?: Array<string>; | ||
| }): Promise<any> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding a Role enum for type safety
While the type definition is more specific now, consider creating an enum for valid roles to prevent runtime errors from invalid role strings.
enum WebinarRole {
HOST = 'HOST',
PRESENTER = 'PRESENTER',
ATTENDEE = 'ATTENDEE'
// Add other valid roles
}
private setControls(setting: {
[Setting.muted]?: boolean;
[Setting.disallowUnmute]?: boolean;
[Setting.muteOnEntry]?: boolean;
[Setting.roles]?: Array<WebinarRole>;
}): Promise<any>;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/utils.js (1)
116-129: Consider expanding test coverage for roles.While the test provides a good foundation, consider enhancing it with additional test cases:
- Multiple roles
- Empty roles array
- Invalid role values
Example enhancement:
it('returns the correct options with roles', () => { const requestingParticipantId = 'test'; const locusUrl = 'urlTest1'; - const roles = ['panelist']; + const testCases = [ + { + roles: ['panelist', 'host', 'cohost'], + description: 'multiple valid roles' + }, + { + roles: [], + description: 'empty roles array' + } + ]; - assert.deepEqual( - MembersUtil.generateLowerAllHandsMemberOptions(requestingParticipantId, locusUrl, roles), - { - requestingParticipantId, - locusUrl, - roles, - } - ); + testCases.forEach(({roles, description}) => { + assert.deepEqual( + MembersUtil.generateLowerAllHandsMemberOptions(requestingParticipantId, locusUrl, roles), + { + requestingParticipantId, + locusUrl, + roles, + }, + `should handle ${description}` + ); + }); });packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/members/util.ts (1)
170-173: Add TypeScript type annotations and JSDoc documentation.The method should include proper type annotations and documentation for the new
rolesparameter to improve type safety and maintainability.- generateLowerAllHandsMemberOptions: (requestingParticipantId, locusUrl, roles) => ({ + /** + * Generates options for lowering hands of participants with specific roles + * @param {string} requestingParticipantId - ID of the participant requesting the action + * @param {string} locusUrl - URL of the locus + * @param {Array<string>} [roles] - Optional array of roles to target specific participant types + * @returns {Object} Options object for the lower all hands request + */ + generateLowerAllHandsMemberOptions: ( + requestingParticipantId: string, + locusUrl: string, + roles?: Array<string> + ) => ({ requestingParticipantId, locusUrl, ...(roles !== undefined && {roles}), }),packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/request.js (3)
Line range hint
228-257: LGTM! Consider adding edge cases.The test case effectively validates the role assignment functionality with multiple roles. However, consider adding edge cases to test:
- Empty roles array
- Invalid role types
- Duplicate role assignments
Line range hint
258-284: Add test coverage for lowering hand scenario.While the test effectively validates raising a hand, consider adding:
- A test case for lowering hand (raised: false)
- Error scenarios (invalid memberId, network errors)
- Rename the describe block to match the method name 'raiseOrLowerHandMember'
- describe('#raiseHand', () => { + describe('#raiseOrLowerHandMember', () => {
352-384: LGTM! Consider additional role validations.The test effectively validates the new roles functionality for lowering hands. Consider adding:
- Test case with multiple roles
- Test case with invalid/empty roles array
- Validation that the utility method's response is used correctly
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/members/index.ts (1)
923-923: Update method documentationThe method's JSDoc comment doesn't describe the new
rolesparameter or its purpose.Update the documentation:
/** * Lower all hands of members in a meeting * @param {String} requestingMemberId - id of the participant which requested the lower all hands + * @param {Array<string>} roles - array of roles whose hands should be lowered * @returns {Promise} * @public * @memberof Members */packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/index.js (1)
714-732: Consider enhancing test coverage with additional edge cases.While the current test cases cover basic scenarios (valid roles and empty roles), consider adding tests for:
- Invalid role values
- Duplicate roles in the array
- Case sensitivity handling of role values
- Maximum number of roles allowed (if any)
Example test cases:
it('should handle invalid role values correctly', async () => { const requestingMemberId = 'test-member-id'; const roles = ['invalid_role', 'panelist']; const { members, spies } = setup('test-locus-url'); const resultPromise = members.lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId, roles); await checkValid(resultPromise, spies, requestingMemberId, 'test-locus-url', roles); }); it('should handle duplicate roles correctly', async () => { const requestingMemberId = 'test-member-id'; const roles = ['panelist', 'panelist', 'attendee']; const { members, spies } = setup('test-locus-url'); const resultPromise = members.lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId, roles); await checkValid(resultPromise, spies, requestingMemberId, 'test-locus-url', roles); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/members/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/members/util.ts(3 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/index.js(2 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/request.js(4 hunks)packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/utils.js(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/utils.js (1)
104-104: LGTM! Clear test case naming.
The renamed test case clearly indicates its purpose of testing behavior without roles.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/members/util.ts (1)
258-258: Verify API contract for role-based hand lowering.
The addition of roles to the request body needs verification against the backend API contract to ensure compatibility.
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/members/index.ts (1)
Line range hint 918-941: Verify the roles parameter validation
The lowerAllHands method has been updated to accept a roles parameter, but there's no validation to ensure the array is not empty or contains valid role values. Consider adding validation to prevent potential issues.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for valid role values used across the codebase
# Search for role-related constants or enums
rg -A 5 "enum.*Role|const.*Role"
# Search for role assignments to understand valid values
ast-grep --pattern 'roles = $_'Consider adding validation:
public lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId: string, roles: Array<string>) {
+ if (!roles || !Array.isArray(roles) || roles.length === 0) {
+ return Promise.reject(
+ new ParameterError(
+ 'The roles parameter must be a non-empty array of valid role values.'
+ )
+ );
+ }
if (!this.locusUrl) {packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/test/unit/spec/members/index.js (1)
663-664: LGTM: Proper test helper function update.
The checkValid function has been correctly updated to handle the new roles parameter, maintaining consistency with the implementation.
Also applies to: 670-671, 676-676
| generateLowerAllHandsMemberOptions: (requestingParticipantId, locusUrl, roles) => ({ | ||
| requestingParticipantId, | ||
| locusUrl, | ||
| ...(roles !== undefined && {roles}), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for invalid roles.
Since this is part of the Webinar feature update, consider:
- Adding validation for the roles array to ensure only valid roles are accepted
- Adding error handling for cases where invalid roles are provided
- Adding unit tests to cover these scenarios
Example validation:
const VALID_WEBINAR_ROLES = ['host', 'cohost', 'presenter', 'attendee'] as const;
const validateRoles = (roles?: Array<string>): boolean => {
if (!roles) return true;
return roles.every(role => VALID_WEBINAR_ROLES.includes(role as any));
};Also applies to: 258-258
| * @returns {Promise} | ||
| * @public | ||
| * @memberof Members | ||
| */ | ||
| public lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId: string) { | ||
| public lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId: string, roles: Array<string>) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Breaking change confirmed - Update documentation and callers
The verification shows this is indeed a breaking change with inconsistencies:
- The README.md shows old usage:
meeting.members.lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId) - The API docs show old signature:
lowerAllHands(requestingMemberId: String) - Test files contain both old and new usage patterns
Required actions:
- Update README.md example to include the new
rolesparameter - Update API documentation to reflect the new signature
- Ensure all test cases are updated to use the new signature consistently
🔗 Analysis chain
Breaking Change: Verify all callers of lowerAllHands
The addition of the required roles parameter is a breaking change. All existing callers of this method will need to be updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all callers of lowerAllHands to ensure they're updated
# Search for method calls
rg -A 3 "lowerAllHands\("
# Search for specific method usage pattern in TypeScript/JavaScript files
ast-grep --pattern 'lowerAllHands($_)'
Length of output: 3539
https://jira-eng-gpk2.cisco.com/jira/browse/SPARK-574497
https://jira-eng-gpk2.cisco.com/jira/browse/SPARK-574501
https://jira-eng-gpk2.cisco.com/jira/browse/SPARK-574504
https://jira-eng-gpk2.cisco.com/jira/browse/SPARK-581113
https://jira-eng-gpk2.cisco.com/jira/browse/SPARK-574506
https://jira-eng-gpk2.cisco.com/jira/browse/SPARK-575353
This pull request addresses
Locus API and DTO change for Converged Webinar, refer to https://sqbu-github.cisco.com/pages/WebExSquared/locus/guides/convergedWebinar.html
by making the following changes
Change Type
The following scenarios were tested
< ENUMERATE TESTS PERFORMED, WHETHER MANUAL OR AUTOMATED >
I certified that
I have read and followed contributing guidelines
I discussed changes with code owners prior to submitting this pull request
I have not skipped any automated checks
All existing and new tests passed
I have updated the documentation accordingly
Make sure to have followed the contributing guidelines before submitting.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
MembersandWebinarclasses.