Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

report todos #296

Closed
11 tasks done
scottaohara opened this issue Mar 21, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
11 tasks done

report todos #296

scottaohara opened this issue Mar 21, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member

scottaohara commented Mar 21, 2021

Add tests and results for

  • img alt=sometext
  • img alt=""
  • img w/out alt
  • td within table / treegrid / grid (tests need publishing)
  • td within table[role=presentation]
  • tr within table / treegrid / grid (tests need publishing)
  • tr within table[role=presentation]
  • th within table / treegrid / grid (tests need publishing)
  • th within table[role=presentation]
  • Element that is a candidate for constraint validation but that does not satisfy its constraints
  • tests for kinds of content / descendant restrictions (related to define nesting conformance requirements for roles when used in HTML #54)
@scottaohara
Copy link
Member Author

scottaohara commented Mar 25, 2021

  • file issue with html validator for image results
  • file issue with html validator for tr, td, th (after tests published)
  • file issue with ibm for image results
  • file issue with ibm for tr, td, th (after tests published)

@stevefaulkner
Copy link
Collaborator

@scottaohara img with some text does not allow role=radio, deliberate omission? If not will add and reup test

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member Author

scottaohara commented Mar 28, 2021

Probably an oversight when we looked at tightening them up. Don’t think it makes much sense in practice but since we allow other similar roles, yeh. Add it @stevefaulkner

stevefaulkner added a commit to ThePacielloGroup/aria-test-builder that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2021
@LJWatson
Copy link

I'm chasing outstanding reviews in #273. If we have not heard from the relevant groups by the start of next week, I'll go ahead an open a CFC with WebApps to transition this to CR.

We typically allow one week for WG CFC, which will put us safely on the other side of the AC meeting publishing moratorium (23 to 29 April).

At that point we'll officially request transition, so the report should have at least two documented implementations for each feature, and the features where the implementation experience is TBC should be marked as "at risk" (so if we have not documented implementations by the time we want to move out of CR, we can do so without returning to WD first).

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member Author

with PR #322, the todos are now complete

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants