Wide review tracker

[LJWatson]

It's been more than two years since we last went out for wide review (#79), meaning we need to do so again before requesting transition to CR.

Requests sent out today:

• APA WG
• ARIA WG
• ARIA in HTML > 2021-04-02 i18n-request#150
• Privacy
• ARIA in HTML review w3ctag/design-reviews#614
• Security
• WebApps WG

An email has also been sent to the public review announcement list.

[LJWatson]

Reminders have been sent to:

• APA WG
• ARIA WG
• PING
• Web Security

According to w3ctag/design-reviews#614, review is scheduled for this week.

Review by I18n is complete with no comments or issues, recorded on w3c/i18n-request#150.

[LJWatson]

Review status as of now:

• APA: No response
• ARIA WG raised <area> with no href should allow roles #317, Should <iframe> support role=dialog? #318, and Should <img> support role=figure? #319
• I18n had no issues, recorded in ARIA in HTML > 2021-04-02 i18n-request#150
• PING raised Privacy review of ARIA in HTML (15th March 2021) #295 (resolved)
• TAG have not been able to provide feedback, noted in ARIA in HTML review w3ctag/design-reviews#614
• Web Security were not able to review

@scottaohara @stevefaulkner and @patrickhlauke, once you've responded to the issues from the ARIA WG, and you've confirmed that the implementation report is complete (with any features without sufficient implementation experience removed or marked as "at risk" if you believe implimentations will be documented within a few weeks), we'll open the WG CFC to make the transition to CR.

[siusin]

The horizontal review is now closed.

[plehegar]

APA WG concluded no need to re-review.