Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address issue #136: order type definitions #137

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2015

Conversation

cjerdonek
Copy link
Contributor

Address issue #136.

@cjerdonek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will do the other types next. Just wanted to start this.


<xs:simpleType name="IdentifierType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="ocd-id" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you ordering the enums only by the name of the enum, or by the name of the enum and then the values of the enum (with 'other' always last)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am only ordering the "chunks" in this PR and not changing the internal ordering of any type or enum definitions (which can happen in subsequent PR's if needed).

@cjerdonek
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe this is done now (just ordering the types). Name changes can occur in subsequent PRs.

@jdmgoogle
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

cjerdonek added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
…r-type-defs

Address issue #136: order type definitions
@cjerdonek cjerdonek merged commit 82594dc into vip5 May 1, 2015
@cjerdonek cjerdonek deleted the feature/issue-136-order-type-defs branch May 1, 2015 20:32
@jdmgoogle jdmgoogle modified the milestone: Version 5.0 May 20, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants