fix(docs): drop Recital 133 misattribution from conformal explainer#125
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR releases v0.28.0 with two new documentation artifacts: VERDICTS.md (a public reference for evidence-sufficiency thresholds and compliance-engine decision logic) and docs/conformal-prediction.md (a non-technical explainer for conformal prediction intervals). Existing documentation is updated with cross-links, and project versions are synchronized to 0.28.0. Changesv0.28.0 Documentation Release
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Recital 133 of the EU AI Act is about synthetic content watermarking under Article 50, not detection of non-conformities or accuracy verification. The conformal-prediction.md and v0.28.0 CHANGELOG entry both cited it incorrectly. Dropping the recital reference; the Article 15(1) anchor stands on its own and is verified against the AI Act text.
4d61f6a to
fe1b7f3
Compare
Recital 133 of the EU AI Act is about synthetic content watermarking under Article 50, not detection of non-conformities or accuracy verification. The conformal-prediction.md doc and v0.28.0 CHANGELOG entry both cited it incorrectly.
Verified the actual Recital 133 text via artificialintelligenceact.eu before this fix. The recital states: "A variety of AI systems can generate large quantities of synthetic content that becomes increasingly hard for humans to distinguish from human-generated and authentic content... it is appropriate to require providers of those systems to embed technical solutions that enable marking in a machine readable format and detection that the output has been generated or manipulated by an AI system."
That maps to Article 50 (transparency for synthetic content) and provider watermarking obligations, not to Article 15 accuracy/robustness or runtime detection of operational non-conformities.
Fix
docs/conformal-prediction.md: drop the Recital 133 paragraph. Article 15(1) anchor stands on its own. Replaced the recital framing with a tighter explanation of why a widening interval is itself the real-time signal.CHANGELOG.mdv0.28.0 entry: drop the "and Recital 133 (detection of non-conformities)" clause from the conformal-prediction.md description.Why this is going in before tagging v0.28.0
v0.28.0 is merged to main but not yet tagged and not yet on PyPI. Landing this fix on main first means the tag points at the corrected content and PyPI never publishes the misattribution. Cleaner than v0.28.1 a few minutes later.
Tests
771 passed, 12 skipped. No code change.
Summary by CodeRabbit
v0.28.0 Release Notes
Documentation
Chores