Skip to content

Conversation

@JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented Jun 5, 2025

Important

Bump napi to 3.0.0-beta.7 and update several dependencies in Cargo.lock, napi/Cargo.toml, and package.json.

  • Dependencies:
    • Bump napi to 3.0.0-beta.7 in Cargo.lock and napi/Cargo.toml.
    • Update napi-derive to 3.0.0-beta.6 in Cargo.lock and napi/Cargo.toml.
    • Update napi-build to 2.2.1 in Cargo.lock and napi/Cargo.toml.
    • Update bitflags to 2.9.1 and hashbrown to 0.15.3 in Cargo.lock.
    • Update @napi-rs/cli to 3.0.0-alpha.87, @types/node to ^22.15.29, and vitest to ^3.2.1 in package.json.
    • Update pnpm to 10.11.1 in package.json.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 919fc9e. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated development dependencies and package manager version to ensure compatibility and improved stability. No user-facing changes.

@JounQin JounQin self-assigned this Jun 5, 2025
@JounQin JounQin added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jun 5, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Walkthrough

This update increases the version numbers of several dependencies in both Rust and JavaScript configuration files. In Rust's Cargo.toml, the napi, napi-derive, and napi-build crates are updated to newer beta and patch releases. In package.json, development dependencies and the package manager version are incremented.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
napi/Cargo.toml Bumped napi to 3.0.0-beta.7, napi-derive to 3.0.0-beta.6, and napi-build to 2.2.1.
package.json Upgraded @napi-rs/cli, @types/node, vitest, and pnpm package manager version.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A hop and a skip, new versions are here,
The crates and the packages, all full of cheer.
With beta and patch, dependencies bloom,
The project now hums a more up-to-date tune.
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f775168 and 919fc9e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • napi/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: Test wasi target
  • GitHub Check: Test (macos-14)
  • GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Test (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
  • GitHub Check: Code Coverage
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
napi/Cargo.toml (2)

14-15: Approve napi crate version bumps.
Bumped napi to v3.0.0-beta.7 and napi-derive to v3.0.0-beta.6. These updates align with the overall N-API version and pull in the latest beta improvements.


29-29: Approve napi-build build-dependency bump.
Updated napi-build from v2.2.0 to v2.2.1. Verify that native binding generation still works as expected under this patch release.

package.json (2)

14-19: Approve JavaScript devDependency version bumps.
Upgraded @napi-rs/cli to v3.0.0-alpha.87, @types/node to ^22.15.29, and vitest to ^3.2.1. Run pnpm install to regenerate the lockfile and confirm no breaking changes in TypeScript typings or tests.


21-21: Confirm pnpm version bump.
Changed packageManager to [email protected]. Ensure local and CI environments use this version, and update any scripts or CI configs that pin the package manager.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedvitest@​3.1.4 ⏵ 3.2.198 +11007799100
Updated@​types/​node@​22.15.21 ⏵ 22.15.29100 +110080 +196100
Updated@​napi-rs/​cli@​3.0.0-alpha.81 ⏵ 3.0.0-alpha.8794 +11008397 +1100

View full report

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.40%. Comparing base (f775168) to head (919fc9e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #133   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.40%   93.40%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2894     2894           
=======================================
  Hits         2703     2703           
  Misses        191      191           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 919fc9e in 2 minutes and 2 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 175 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 9 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.lock:676
  • Draft comment:
    Bump napi to 3.0.0-beta.7 and update related deps (napi-build, napi-derive, napi-sys). Verify compatibility.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is about updating dependencies and asks to verify compatibility, which violates the rule against asking the PR author to ensure compatibility or verify behavior. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.
2. Cargo.lock:730
  • Draft comment:
    New dependency nohash-hasher added. Confirm it is required and secure.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to confirm the necessity and security of a new dependency. This falls under the rule of not commenting on dependency changes or asking for confirmation about their necessity or security.
3. Cargo.lock:497
  • Draft comment:
    Hashbrown updated to 0.15.3; note multiple versions (e.g., 0.12.3 also present). Ensure this is intentional.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% Multiple dependency versions in Cargo.lock are very common and normal in Rust projects. This is how Cargo handles different dependencies requiring different versions. The comment is asking for verification of something that is both normal and automatically handled by Cargo's dependency resolver. The comment doesn't point out any actual problem that needs fixing. Could multiple versions of the same crate indicate a potential optimization opportunity to reduce binary size or compilation time? While dependency deduplication can sometimes be beneficial, this is a Cargo.lock file which reflects the resolved dependency tree. Any version conflicts would have already been caught by Cargo during resolution. The presence of multiple versions is not inherently problematic. The comment should be deleted as it asks for verification of something that is both normal and automatically handled by Cargo, without identifying any actual issue that needs fixing.
4. napi/Cargo.toml:14
  • Draft comment:
    Bump napi dependency to 3.0.0-beta.7. Test for any breaking changes.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is about a dependency change and suggests testing for breaking changes. This violates the rule against asking the PR author to ensure the change is tested or to verify behavior.
5. napi/Cargo.toml:15
  • Draft comment:
    Bump napi-derive to 3.0.0-beta.6 to align with the napi version.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative, as it only states that a dependency version is being updated. It doesn't provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
6. napi/Cargo.toml:29
  • Draft comment:
    Update napi-build to 2.2.1 in build-dependencies.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and relates to a dependency change. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
7. package.json:14
  • Draft comment:
    Upgrade @napi-rs/cli to 3.0.0-alpha.87; ensure it works with new napi versions.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is related to a dependency change, specifically upgrading a package to a new version. The comment suggests ensuring compatibility with new napi versions, which falls under the rule of not commenting on dependency changes or asking for confirmation of behavior. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
8. package.json:19
  • Draft comment:
    Upgrade vitest to ^3.2.1. Verify tests run correctly.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to verify that tests run correctly after upgrading a dependency. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure the change is tested.
9. package.json:21
  • Draft comment:
    Update packageManager to [email protected] for consistency.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment looked like it was already resolved.

Workflow ID: wflow_HWLiDvzMliGktIHC

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jun 5, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #133 will not alter performance

Comparing chore/deps (919fc9e) with main (f775168)

Summary

✅ 3 untouched benchmarks

@JounQin JounQin merged commit 4810a16 into main Jun 5, 2025
23 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the chore/deps branch June 5, 2025 06:06
@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants