Skip to content

Conversation

@JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented Jun 5, 2025

πŸ€– New release

  • unrs_resolver: 1.7.9 -> 1.7.10 (βœ“ API compatible changes)
Changelog

1.7.10 - 2025-06-05

Bug Fixes

  • Revert "fix: custom condition_names should take higher priority than target in package.json (#115)" (#131)

Other

  • chore: bump napi v3.0.0-beta.7 (#133)


This PR was generated with release-plz.


Important

Bump unrs_resolver version to 1.7.10 with API-compatible changes and fix PnP global cache support.

  • Release:
    • Bump unrs_resolver version from 1.7.9 to 1.7.10 in Cargo.toml and Cargo.lock.
    • Includes API-compatible changes.
  • Bug Fixes:
    • Fix PnP global cache support issue (Windows still unsupported).
  • Misc:
    • Generated by release-plz.

This description was created by Ellipsis for ec18dca. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-06-05T06-13-53Z branch from ec18dca to 248fce1 Compare June 5, 2025 06:13
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@JounQin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec60524 and ebee5c3.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (5 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • npm/package.json (2 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed everything up to ec18dca in 41 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 26 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:7
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump updated to 1.7.10. Ensure this is in sync with Cargo.lock and release notes.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_cK9s000XXuxVolTw

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 93.40%. Comparing base (4810a16) to head (ebee5c3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #135   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.40%   93.40%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2894     2894           
=======================================
  Hits         2703     2703           
  Misses        191      191           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jun 5, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #135 will not alter performance

Comparing release-plz-2025-06-05T06-13-53Z (ebee5c3) with main (4810a16)

Summary

βœ… 3 untouched benchmarks

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed ebee5c3 in 1 minute and 1 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 75 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. CHANGELOG.md:10
  • Draft comment:
    New release section for v1.7.10 added looks good. Consider adding a brief note explaining the rationale for reverting the custom 'condition_names' fix (line 14) for future clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
2. CHANGELOG.md:163
  • Draft comment:
    Inline emphasis markers were changed from asterisks (*) to underscores (_). Ensure this style change (e.g. (napi), (README), (pnp)) is consistent with your project's markdown guidelines.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_0rqkEqPaVvw7OMbC

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@JounQin JounQin merged commit 934bb46 into main Jun 5, 2025
23 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the release-plz-2025-06-05T06-13-53Z branch June 5, 2025 06:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants