Conversation
ogzhanolguncu
requested review from
MichaelUnkey,
chronark,
mcstepp and
perkinsjr
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request updates several dashboard and UI components along with their documentation. In the dashboard, the create API button label is updated while the loading pages for APIs and rate limits are overhauled to include navigation bars, search controls, icons, and card grids. The authorization component’s import is consolidated. Additionally, new documentation and variant examples for FormInput, FormTextarea, and Textarea components are introduced. Internal UI components are refactored to support an optional property with structured tag rendering and a new Textarea component with variant styling and icon support. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DashboardPage
participant Navbar
participant SearchControls
participant CardGrid
User->>DashboardPage: Navigate to Dashboard
DashboardPage->>Navbar: Render navigation bar with breadcrumbs and action buttons
DashboardPage->>SearchControls: Render search inputs and icon buttons
DashboardPage->>CardGrid: Render grid layout with cards
Note right of DashboardPage: Refresh button is displayed but disabled
sequenceDiagram
participant Parent
participant FormInput
participant TagComponent
Parent->>FormInput: Render FormInput with props (required/optional)
alt Optional prop is true
FormInput->>TagComponent: Render OptionalTag
else if Required prop is true
FormInput->>TagComponent: Render RequiredTag
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
|
@perkinsjr @chronark that |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/apis/_components/create-api-button.tsx (1)
62-62: Consider consistent capitalization between button and dialog.The button label now uses "Create new API" (lowercase "new"), but the dialog title at line 68 still uses "Create New API" (uppercase "New"). Consider making the capitalization consistent across both elements.
apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-textarea.mdx (1)
114-123: Fix grammar in best practices list.There's a minor grammatical inconsistency in the list of best practices.
- Always provide clear, concise labels - Use description text to provide additional context when needed -- Keep error messages specific and actionable +- To keep error messages specific and actionable - Use required fields sparingly and logically - Group related form elements using fieldset and legend when appropriateAlternatively, for consistency with the other bullet points that start with verbs:
- Always provide clear, concise labels - Use description text to provide additional context when needed -- Keep error messages specific and actionable +- Provide error messages that are specific and actionable - Use required fields sparingly and logically🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~115-~115: The verb “Keep” needs to be in the to-infinitive form.
Context: ...text to provide additional context when needed - Keep error messages specific and actionable ...(MISSING_TO_BEFORE_A_VERB)
apps/engineering/content/design/components/textarea.mdx (1)
19-25: Consider enhancing the usage examples.
While the default dropdown variant is shown, it may be helpful to include a snippet illustrating how to integrate thisTextareaDefaultVariantin a form, helping developers understand usage in real contexts.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/loading.tsx (1)
8-29: Avoid nesting multiple<nav>elements for accessibility.
It’s generally recommended to keep only one<nav>element for primary navigation and use lists or<div>wrappers for breadcrumb items. This helps assistive technologies parse the document structure more consistently.internal/ui/src/components/textarea.tsx (1)
49-53: Props are well-structured and documented.
Consider adding optional ARIA-related props (likearia-label) for cases where a visible label might be absent. This would help ensure better accessibility.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/apis/loading.tsx (3)
6-44: Consider consolidating nested navigation elements.
Using<nav>within another<nav>can be valid but sometimes confusing from an accessibility standpoint; consider using a<div>for sub-navigation or employing a dedicated breadcrumb component for clarity.
45-106: Enhance search accessibility.
Currently, there's no actual<input>element for the search field, so assistive technologies might have difficulty recognizing it as a search control. Consider using<input type="search" />with an associated label or suitable ARIA attributes to improve accessibility.
109-157: Review array index usage for keys in placeholder mapping.
Using the array index as a key can cause subtle issues if the array content changes out of order. For purely decorative placeholders in a static list, this is typically acceptable. Otherwise, consider a stable, unique identifier if items may reorder.apps/engineering/content/design/components/textarea/textarea.variants.tsx (1)
1-87: Add accessible labeling or ARIA attributes for better usability.
All variants rely primarily on the placeholder for user guidance. For real-world usage, consider providing explicit labels oraria-label/aria-labelledbyattributes to ensure accessibility and clarity for screen readers.internal/ui/src/components/form/form-textarea.tsx (4)
46-46: Label styling is appropriate.
You may optionally addhtmlForand a more descriptive class name if further styling or targeting is needed.
111-113: Structured approach to handle error states.
Extending this for other states like success/warning can further unify the design language.
115-126: OptionalTag component is straightforward.
Consider i18n if you need localization later.
128-142: RequiredTag component follows the same pattern.
Similarly, i18n or shared styling might be beneficial if extended across multiple tags.apps/engineering/content/design/components/form/form-textarea.variants.tsx (2)
87-98: Consider consistent variant pattern for error statesI noticed that success and warning states use the
variantprop (variant="success"andvariant="warning"), while the error state uses a separateerrorprop instead ofvariant="error". This may be intentional to support custom error messages, but it creates an inconsistency in the API pattern.- <FormTextarea - label="Code Snippet" - error="Invalid syntax in your code" - placeholder="function castRing() { ... }" - /> + <FormTextarea + label="Code Snippet" + variant="error" + description="Invalid syntax in your code" + placeholder="function castRing() { ... }" + />Alternatively, document why this inconsistency exists if it's by design.
4-14: Consider adding JSDoc comments for each variantAdding JSDoc comments to each exported component would improve documentation and provide better IDE tooltips for developers using these components. For example:
+ /** + * Default FormTextarea variant with label, description, and placeholder + */ export const DefaultFormTextareaVariant = () => { // ... };Also applies to: 17-28, 31-42, 45-56, 59-71, 74-85, 88-98, 101-113, 116-127, 130-142, 145-159
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/apis/_components/create-api-button.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/apis/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/authorization/_components/rbac-form.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-input.mdx(3 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-textarea.mdx(1 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/form/form-input.variants.tsx(1 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/form/form-textarea.variants.tsx(1 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/textarea.mdx(1 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/textarea/textarea.variants.tsx(1 hunks)internal/ui/src/components/form/form-input.tsx(2 hunks)internal/ui/src/components/form/form-textarea.tsx(4 hunks)internal/ui/src/components/form/index.tsx(1 hunks)internal/ui/src/components/textarea.tsx(1 hunks)internal/ui/src/index.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-textarea.mdx
[grammar] ~115-~115: The verb “Keep” needs to be in the to-infinitive form.
Context: ...text to provide additional context when needed - Keep error messages specific and actionable ...
(MISSING_TO_BEFORE_A_VERB)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
- GitHub Check: Test Go API Local / Test
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/nextjs
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/rbac
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/keys
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/hono
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/cache
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/clickhouse
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/api
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/resend
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/id
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/hash
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/billing
- GitHub Check: Build / Build
- GitHub Check: Test API / API Test Local
- GitHub Check: autofix
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (34)
internal/ui/src/index.ts (1)
8-8: Appropriate export for the textarea component.This export makes the textarea component available to other parts of the application, which aligns with the PR objective of moving the textarea to UI.
internal/ui/src/components/form/index.tsx (1)
2-2: Appropriate export for the form-textarea component.This export statement makes the form-textarea component accessible from the form module, which is necessary for the component to be used throughout the application.
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/authorization/_components/rbac-form.tsx (1)
8-8: Good consolidation of imports.This change appropriately consolidates the FormTextarea import with other UI components, which is cleaner and more maintainable than having separate import statements.
apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-input.mdx (4)
8-9: New input variants added for enhanced form states.The addition of
RequiredWithErrorFormInputVariantandOptionalFormInputVariantimproves the component documentation by covering more form field scenarios.
33-33: Description update for required fields.Good clarification that required prop adds a "Required" tag instead of an asterisk, which matches the updated implementation.
37-47: New documentation sections for form field states.The added sections for "Required Field with Error" and "Optional Field" provide clear explanations of these field states and their visual treatment. This enhances the component documentation.
130-130: Updated layout guideline to reflect new optional tag.The guideline now correctly refers to the "optional tag" instead of an asterisk, aligning with the component's new visual treatment.
internal/ui/src/components/form/form-input.tsx (4)
5-5: Import tags from form-textarea component.I notice the tags are now imported from the form-textarea component. This suggests a refactoring where these shared UI elements have been moved to a single location.
12-12: Added optional property to form input props.The new
optional?: booleanproperty enhances the FormInput component by allowing explicit indication of non-mandatory fields.
19-19: Updated props destructuring to include optional flag.The component now properly destructures the new optional property alongside existing props.
34-35: Replaced inline asterisk with structured tag components.The implementation now uses dedicated tag components for required and optional fields, which improves consistency and allows for better styling of these indicators. The error state of required tags is also handled appropriately.
apps/engineering/content/design/components/form/form-input.variants.tsx (2)
30-42: Added variant for required field with error state.The new
RequiredWithErrorFormInputVariantdemonstrates how the required tag's appearance changes when an error occurs, providing a useful visual example for documentation.
44-56: Added variant for optional field state.The new
OptionalFormInputVariantprovides a clear example of how optional fields are displayed with their descriptive tag, maintaining consistency with other form variants.apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-textarea.mdx (4)
1-4: Well-structured documentation for new FormTextarea component.The documentation follows the same format as FormInput, providing consistency across component documentation.
21-26: Clear component description and usage guidance.The introduction effectively explains the purpose and benefits of the FormTextarea component for multi-line text input scenarios.
37-48: Comprehensive documentation of required and optional states.The documentation clearly explains how the required and optional states are visually represented, including error handling for required fields.
126-130: Consistent layout guidelines with FormInput.The layout guidelines properly match those in the FormInput documentation, maintaining consistency across components.
apps/engineering/content/design/components/textarea.mdx (2)
1-4: Great documentation introduction.
The front matter and overall structure look good.
84-93: Icon guidelines are well-documented.
Providing clear recommendations around icon sizing, color inheritance, and best practices ensures consistent and accessible usage.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/loading.tsx (1)
124-170: Placeholders for rate limit cards look good.
This grid-based skeleton structure provides a more realistic preview of the final UI compared to genericSkeletoncomponents. No further concerns here.internal/ui/src/components/textarea.tsx (2)
1-4: Good approach using class-variance-authority.
This setup keeps variant logic consistent and maintainable.
58-81: Verify accessibility compliance.
When adding icons as purely decorative elements, confirm that screen readers ignore them (e.g., usingaria-hidden="true"or equivalent). If icons convey meaning or allow user interaction, ensure label or title attributes are present.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/apis/loading.tsx (2)
2-2: No issues with the icon imports.
159-159: Closing container node looks good.
No concerns.internal/ui/src/components/form/form-textarea.tsx (8)
2-4: Imports and utility usage look fine.
No concerns here.
7-13: Type definitions accurately extend document-based props.
This addition is consistent with your architecture.
15-15: Merged prop type definition is straightforward.
Looks good for maintaining clarity and reusability.
28-29: Icon props are well-integrated.
PassingleftIconandrightIconaligns with a flexible UI design pattern.
49-50: Conditional tags for required/optional states are simple and clear.
No implementation concerns.
53-53: Textarea usage is consistent with the existing patterns.
No functional concerns here.
56-59: Variant and icon props are cleanly passed down.
This effectively toggles the component’s styles depending on validation state.
107-109: Generic tag props are well-defined.
They enable flexibility for further customization if needed.apps/engineering/content/design/components/form/form-textarea.variants.tsx (2)
1-159: Well-structured variant examples with thematic referencesGreat job creating a comprehensive set of variants for the FormTextarea component. The Lord of the Rings themed examples make the documentation both informative and engaging. The file is well-organized with clear comments for each variant.
153-156: Great use of additional props in the complex exampleThe complex example effectively demonstrates how to use additional props like
className,id, androws. This helps developers understand the full range of customization options available.
2 participants
What does this PR do?
Fixes # (issue)
If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists
Type of change
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit