Conversation
chronark
requested review from
MichaelUnkey,
mcstepp,
ogzhanolguncu and
perkinsjr
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes refactor the documentation and type definitions for form and input components. In the design MDX files, the explicit prop definitions in the AutoTypeTable have been replaced with references to external documented types. In the internal UI components, new types—DocumentedFormInputProps and DocumentedInputProps—are introduced and integrated into the existing prop definitions, streamlining the documentation process. There are no modifications to the underlying component functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
internal/ui/src/components/input.tsx (1)
52-57: Consider a more maintainable solution for type documentation.The comment indicates this is a hack for fumadocs' AutoTypeTable. Consider exploring a more permanent solution, such as:
- Using TypeDoc or similar tools that can extract types directly from the code
- Creating a dedicated types file that can be used by both the component and documentation
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/engineering/content/design/components/form-input.mdx(2 hunks)apps/engineering/content/design/components/input.mdx(2 hunks)internal/ui/src/components/form/form-input.tsx(1 hunks)internal/ui/src/components/input.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/engineering/content/design/components/input.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/rbac
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/hono
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/cache
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/api
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/clickhouse
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/resend
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/keys
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/id
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/hash
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/encryption
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/billing
- GitHub Check: Test Go API Local / test_agent_local
- GitHub Check: Test API / API Test Local
- GitHub Check: Test Agent Local / test_agent_local
- GitHub Check: Build / Build
- GitHub Check: autofix
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
internal/ui/src/components/input.tsx (1)
59-59: LGTM!The updated type definition maintains all existing functionality while improving type documentation.
internal/ui/src/components/form/form-input.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM!The import statement correctly includes all required types and follows a logical order.
6-12: Consider a more maintainable solution for type documentation.Similar to the input component, this uses a hack for fumadocs' AutoTypeTable. Consider exploring a more permanent solution that can be used across all components.
13-13: LGTM!The updated type definition maintains all existing functionality while improving type documentation.
3 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Refactor