Skip to content

chore: update legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts#2158

Merged
chronark merged 2 commits intounkeyed:mainfrom
eltociear:patch-3
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

chore: update legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts#2158
chronark merged 2 commits intounkeyed:mainfrom
eltociear:patch-3

Conversation

@eltociear
Copy link
Contributor

@eltociear eltociear commented Oct 3, 2024

What does this PR do?

identifiy -> identify

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Ran pnpm fmt
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected the description of the name field in the response schema for improved clarity.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced documentation for the legacy_keys_verifyKey route without changing functionality.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 0e0580b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 3, 2024

@eltociear is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts file, specifically updating the response schema within the createRoute function. The primary modification involves correcting the spelling of "identifiy" to "identify" in the description of the name field. This correction enhances the clarity of the documentation while maintaining the existing structure and functionality of the schemas. The route remains deprecated, with no changes to the API endpoint's method or path.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/api/src/routes/legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts Corrected the spelling of "identifiy" to "identify" in the response schema description. No changes to the structure or functionality of the schemas.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant LegacyKeyService

    Client->>API: Request to verify key
    API->>LegacyKeyService: Call createRoute function
    LegacyKeyService-->>API: Return response with key verification
    API-->>Client: Send response with verification result
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 321ae65 and 0e0580b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/api/src/routes/legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/api/src/routes/legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 3, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 3, 2024 9:58am
planetfall ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 3, 2024 9:58am
play ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 3, 2024 9:58am
workflows ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 3, 2024 9:58am
www ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 3, 2024 9:58am

Copy link
Collaborator

@chronark chronark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@chronark chronark enabled auto-merge October 3, 2024 09:55
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – planetfall October 3, 2024 09:55 Inactive
@chronark chronark self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – play October 3, 2024 09:56 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – dashboard October 3, 2024 09:57 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – workflows October 3, 2024 09:57 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – www October 3, 2024 09:58 Inactive
@chronark chronark added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into unkeyed:main with commit a7cb075 Oct 3, 2024
@oss-gg
Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Awarding eltociear: 50 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/eltociear

harshsbhat pushed a commit to harshsbhat/unkey that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
* chore: update legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts

identifiy -> identify

* [autofix.ci] apply automated fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
mcstepp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
* chore: update legacy_keys_verifyKey.ts

identifiy -> identify

* [autofix.ci] apply automated fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants